Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:12:30.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rising Trizygotic Triplet Rates in Japan, 1975-1994

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Y. Imaizumi  and
K. Nonaka
Y. Imaizumi*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
K. Nonaka
Affiliation:
Department of Hygiene, Teikyo University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
*
National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, 1-2-3, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 100, Japan

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Zygosity of triplet births in Japan was estimated by Allen's equation with the assumption that the rate of dizygotic (DZ) triplets reflects that of twins. Whereas the DZ triplet rate increased during the period from 1975 to 1994, reflecting the increase in the DZ twinning rate in the period, monozygotic (MZ) triplet rates remained constant from 1975 (28 per million births) to 1994 (23). The trizygotic (TZ) triplet rate gradually increased from 1975 (18) up to 1985 (29), and rapidly increased thereafter to 1994 (202). The higher TZ triplet rate since 1986 is most likely attributed to the higher proportion of mothers treated with ovulation-inducing hormones and partially to in-vitro fertilization in Japan. As for maternal age, MZ triplet rates remained nearly constant for all the maternal age groups except the youngest and the oldest ones. On the other hand, TZ triplet rates increased up to the age group of 30-34 years and decreased thereafter in almost every year. The TZ rate in the age group of 30-34 years slowly increased from 1975 to 1988 (63 per million births) and rapidly increased thereafter (314 in 1994). The TZ rate was statistically significantly higher in the period 1986-1994 than in the period 1975-1985 in each of the nine districts in Japan. Geographical variations in the TZ rates in the latest period have drastically changed from those during the period from 1955-1959 and in 1974.

Keywords

Triplet rateZygosityMaternal ageGeographical variations
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1997 , pp. 87 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1997

References

REFERENCES

1.Allen, G (1960): A differential method for estimation of type frequencies in triplets and quadruplets. Am J Hum Genet 12: 210–224.Google Scholar
2.Hiroi, M, Ibuki, R, Noda, Y, et al. (1996): The committee Report on the Registration for Reproductive Medicine in 1994 (the 7th report). Acta Obst Gynaec Jap 48: 1182–1196.Google Scholar
3.Imaizumi, Y (1987): The recent trends in multiple births and stillbirth rates in Japan. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36: 325–334.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Imaizumi, Y (1992): Twinning rates in Japan, 1951-1990. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 41: 165–175.Google Scholar
5.Imaizumi, Y (1994): Recent and long term trends of multiple birth rates and influencing factors in Japan. J of Epidemiology 4: 103–109 (1994).Google Scholar
6.Imaizumi, Y, Inouye, E (1980): Analysis of multiple birth rates in Japan. III. Secular trend, maternal age effect and geographical variation in triplet rates. Jpn J Human Genet 25: 73–81.Google Scholar
7.Imaizumi, Y, Nonaka, K (1997): The twinning rates by zygosity in Japan, 1975-1994. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 46: 87–98.Google Scholar
8.Inouye, E, Imaizumi, Y (1981): Analysis of twinning rates in Japan. In: Gedda, L, Parisi, P, Nance, WE (eds): Twin Research 3: Twin Biology and Multiple Pregnancy, New York: Alan R. Liss, p. 21–33.Google Scholar
9.Kurachi, Ket al (1983): The outcome of pregnancy following medical treatment to the HMG (Humegon)-HCG. Sanka to Fujinka 50: 274–281.Google Scholar
10.Mizunuma, H, Igarashi, M (1991): Ovulation-inducing hormones (HMG): Its theory and practice. Obstetrical and Gynecological Practice 40: 321–327 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
11.Mori, T (1987): Progress in reproductive and medical technology. Sanfujinka no Sekai 39: 963–966 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
12.Mori, T, Aono, T, Shimizu, T, et al. (1993): The committee Report on the Registration for Reproductive Medicine in 1992 (the 4th report). Acta Obst Gynaec Jap 45: 397–410 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
13.Sawazaki, C, Tsubata, H (1976): Statistics of multiple births in Japan. Sanka to Fujinka 43: 863–869 (in Japanese).Google Scholar