Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:00:35.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rhesus Prophylaxis After Twin Delivery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Louis Keith*
Affiliation:
Cook County Hospital, 1825 West Harrison Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1972

References

REFERENCES

Hughes-Jones, N.C., Mollison, P.L. 1968. Failure of a relatively small dose of passively administered anti-Rh to suppress primary immunization by a relatively large dose of Rh-positive red cells. Br. Med. J., 1: 150151.Google Scholar
Keith, L., Cuva, A., Houser, K., Webster, A. 1970. Suppression of primary Rh-immunization by Anti-Rh. Transfusion, 10: 142147.Google Scholar
Keith, L.G., Hauser, G. 1971. Anti-Rh immune globulin after a massive transfusion accident. Transfusion, 11: 172.Google Scholar
Keith, L. 1972. Anti-Rh therapy after transfusion. J. Reprod. Med., 8: 293298.Google Scholar
Kleihauer, E., Braun, H., Betke, K. 1957. Demonstration von fetalem Haemoglobin in den Erythrocyten eines Blutausstrichs. Klin. Wochenschr., 35: 637.Google Scholar
Pollack, W., Gorman, J.G., Freda, V.J. 1969. Prevention of Rh-hemolytic disease. Progr. Hemat., 6: 121147.Google Scholar
Pollak, W., Ascari, W.Q., Kochesky, R.J., O'Connor, R.R., Ho, T., Tripodi, T. 1971 a. Studies in rhesus prophylaxis. I. The relationship between dose of anti-Rh and the size of the antigenic stimulus. Transfusion, 11: 333339.Google Scholar
Pollack, W., Ascari, W.Q., Crispen, J.F., O'Connor, R.R., Ho, T. 1971 6. Studies on rhesus prophylaxis. II. Rh-immune prophylaxis after transfusion with Rh-positive blood. Transfusion, 11: 340344.Google Scholar
WHO Report 468. 1971. Prevention of Rh-sensitization: Report of a WHO Scientific Group: 136. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar