Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:56:55.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resting Metabolic Rate in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

E. Fontaine
Affiliation:
Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Laval University Quebec
R. Savard
Affiliation:
Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Laval University Quebec
A. Tremblay
Affiliation:
Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Laval University Quebec
J.P. Després
Affiliation:
Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Laval University Quebec
E. Poehlman
Affiliation:
Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Laval University Quebec
C. Bouchard*
Affiliation:
Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Laval University Quebec
*
Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, PEPS - Laval University Ste-Foy, Québec, CanadaGIK 7P4

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In order to study the influence of heredity on resting metabolic rate (RMR), 20 monozygotic and 19 dizygotic male twin pairs aged 20.6 (SD 2.9) and 21.4 (SD 3.1) years, gave their consent to participate in the experiment. Fat free weight (FFW) was estimated from underwater weighing. RMR was measured by indirect calorimetry using an open circuit system. RMR was expressed as kJ · min−1, kJ/m2 · h−1, kJ/kg · h−1 and kJ/kgFFW · h−1. Significant intraclass coefficients were observed in MZ twins for the different expressions of RMR. The values ranged from r = 0.45 (P < 0.05) to r = 0.81 (P < 0.01). However, DZ twins demonstrated lower intraclass coefficients for RMR, with a range from r = 0.21 to r = 0.44. Significant (P < 0.05) DZ resemblance was revealed only when RMR was expressed as kJ · min−1 and kJ/kg · h−1. Results of the present study suggest that variations in RMR may have a genetic component. Implications for human energy balance and body fat are discussed.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1985

References

REFERENCES

1. Bouchard, C (1980): Transient environmental effects detected in sibling correlations. Ann Hum Biol 7:8992.Google Scholar
2. Bouchard, C, Savard, R, Després, JP, Tremblay, A, Leblanc, C (1985): Body composition in adopted and biological siblings. Hum Biol (in press).Google Scholar
3. Bray, GA, Atkinson, RL (1977): Factors affecting basal metabolic rate. Prog Fd Nutr Sci 12:395403.Google Scholar
4. Brook, CGD, Huntley, RMC, Slack, J (1975): Influence of heredity and environment in determination of skinfold thickness in children. Brit Med J 2:719721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Christian, JC (1979): Testing twins means and estimating genetic variance. Basic methodology for the analysis of quantitative twin data. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:3540.Google Scholar
6. Danforth, E (1981): Dietary induced thermogenesis: control of energy expenditure. Life Sci 28:18211827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Després, JP, Bouchard, C (1984): Monozygotic twin resemblance in fatness and fat cell lipolysis. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33:472485.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Fontaine, E, Savard, R, Tremblay, A, Després, JP, Poehlman, E, Bouchard, C (1984): Resting metabolic rate in exercise-trained and untrained subjects: relationship with body fatness (Unpublished).Google Scholar
9. Fontaine, E, Nadeau, A, Tremblay, A (1983): Acute effect of exercise on resting metabolic rate and thermic effect of glucose. Can J Appl Sport Sci 8:220 (Abstract).Google Scholar
10. Griffiths, M, Payne, PR (1976): Energy expenditure in small children of obese and non obese parents. Nature 260:698700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Haggard, EA (1958): Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance. New York: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
12. Lusk, G (1928): The Elements of Science of Nutrition, Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
14. Miller, DS (1979): Thermogenesis and energy needs. Z. Ernährungswiss Suppl 23:8591.Google Scholar
15. Miller, DS, Parsonage, S (1975): Resistance to slimming adaptation or illusion? Lancet 773775.Google Scholar
16. Mueller, WH (1983): The genetics of human fatness. Yearb Phys Anthropol 26:215230.Google Scholar
17. Ritthaler, F, Weis, M, Hack, F, Weicker, H (1980): Two biopsy techniques for human subcutaneous adipose tissue. Int J Sports Med 1:5051.Google Scholar
18. Rodbell, M (1964): Metabolism of isolated fat cells. J Biol Chem 239:375380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Savard, R, Bouchard, C, Leblanc, C, Tremblay, A (1983): Familial resemblance in fatness indicators. Ann Hum Biol 10:111118.Google Scholar
20. Siri, WE (1956): The gross composition of the body. Adv Biol Med Phys 4:239280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Warwick, PM, Toft, R, Garrow, J (1978): Individual variation in energy expenditure. In Bray, GA (ed): Recent Advances in Obesity Research (Vol. 2). London: Newman.Google Scholar
22. Wilmore, JH, Vodak, PA, Pan, RB, Girandola, RN, Billing, JE (1980): Further simplification of a method for determination of residual lung volume. Med Sci Sports Exerc 12:216218.Google Scholar