Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:18:44.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relative Cervical Incompetence in Twin Pregnancy. Assessment and Efficacy of Cervical Suture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

D.P. Sinha
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics andGynaecology of University of Aberdeen
V.C. Nandakumar
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of St. Peter's Hospital, Chertsey
A.K. Brough
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, UK
M.S. Beebeejaun
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of 88 women with a twin pregnancy who had elective cervical suture were compared with 76 women with a twin pregnancy who had cervical assessment between the 13th and the 28th weeks of gestation but received no active treatment. The incidence of spontaneous onset of labour before 36 weeks was higher in the cervical suture group, and 53.4% of them sustained cervical damage.

Type
Session III: Management of Twin Pregnancy
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1979

References

REFERENCES

1. Anderson, WJR (1956): J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 63:205.Google Scholar
2. McDonald, IA (1963): J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 70:105.Google Scholar
3. MacGillivray, I, Nylander, PPS, Corney, G (1975): “Human Multiple Reproduction.” London: W.B. Saunders, p 136.Google Scholar
4. McKeown, T, Record, RG (1952): J Endocrinol 5:387.Google Scholar
5. Siski, AG, Miller, LA (1963): Obstet Gynecol 22:227.Google Scholar
6. Weekes, ARL, Menzies, DN, De Boer, CH (1977): Br J Obstet Gynaecol 3:161.Google Scholar
7. Zakut, H, Insler, V, Serr, DM (1977): Isr J Med Sci 13:488.Google Scholar