Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:16:37.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Permissiveness-Restrictiveness for Twins and Controls in Two Educational Settings: The Swedish Compulsory School and the Israeli Kibbutz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

S. Fischbein ,
R. Guttman ,
M. Nathan  and
A. Esrachi
S. Fischbein*
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Research, Stockholm Institute of Education, Sweden
R. Guttman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Hebrew University, and the Louis Guttman Institute of Applied Social Research, Jerusalem, Israel
M. Nathan
Affiliation:
Oranim School of Education of the Kibbutz Movement, University of Haifa, Kiryat Tivon, Israel
A. Esrachi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Hebrew University, and the Louis Guttman Institute of Applied Social Research, Jerusalem, Israel
*
Department of Educational Research, Stockholm Institute of Education, Box 34103, S-100 26 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a previous longitudinal twin project a model was developed for studying heredity-environment interaction. One important environmental dimension in this model is permissiveness-restrictiveness. The purpose of the present study has therefore been to investigate perceived and imposed restrictiveness at the societal and classroom level and possible interactional effects on pupil behavior. Results are reported from grade 4 to grade 6 in Israeli kibbutzim and Swedish compulsory school. One major finding is that no systematic differences have been found between twins and controls in the two countries. In both Swedish schools and Israeli kibbutzim permissiveness-restrictiveness will vary depending upon perspective (perceived or imposed) and upon content (type of subject or rule-breaking activity). Preliminary within-pair comparisons for the Swedish twins are reported for different types of test results. In agreement with the model, logical abstract thinking as well as reading and mathematics achievement seem to be less influenced by hereditary factors in a restrictive educational setting than in a permissive one.

Keywords

Permissiveness/restrictivenessSchool educationKibbutzTwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 245 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.Bronfenbrenner, U, (1979): The Ecology of Human Development. Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2.Canter, D (1985): Facet Theory. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cohen, DJ, Dibble, E (1975): Reliably separating identical from fraternal twins. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 32:1371–1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Fischbein, S 1978: Heredity-Environment Interaction in the development of twins. Int J Behav Dev 1:313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Fischbein, S (1979): Heredity-Environment Influences on Growth and Development During Adolescence. Lund: Liber.Google Scholar
6.Fischbein, S 1979: Intra-pair similarity in IQ of monozygotic and dizygotic male twins at 12 and 18 years of age. Ann Hum Biol 6:496–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Fischbein, S (1986): Person-Environment Interaction in Educational Settings. Report no. 1 from the Department of Educational Research. Stockholm Institute of Education.Google Scholar
8.Fischbein, S 1987: Nature-nuture interaction in different types of school environments. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36:155–163.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Guttman, L (1981): Efficacy coefficients for differences among averages. In Borg, I (ed): Multi-Dimensional Data Representations When and Why. Mathesis Press: Ann Arbor, Mich, pp 1–10.Google Scholar
10.Guttman, L 1988: Eta, Disco, Odisco, and F. Psychometrika 53:393–405.Google Scholar
11.Guttman, R 1984: Genetic analysis of analytic-spatial ability: Raven's Progressive Matrices. Behav Genet 4:273–284.Google Scholar
12.Guttman, R, Zohar, A 1988: Spouse similarities in personality traits for intra- and interethnic marriages in Israel. Personality and Individual Differences 9:763–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Guttman, R, Nathan, M, Ezrachi, A 1987: Retrictiveness-permissiveness of their environment as perceived by kibbutz twins and singletons. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36:165–170.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Nathan, M, Guttman, R 1984: Similarities in test scores and profiles of kibbutz twins and singletons. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33:213–218.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Nathan, M, Schnabl-Brandes, A 1985: Development al patterns of kibbutz-born boys and girls in Raven's progressive matrices (in Hebrew). Hakibbutz 11:47–57.Google Scholar
16.Plomin, R, Daniels, D (1987): Why are children in the same family so different from one another? Behav Brain Sci 10:1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar