Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:57:34.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Northwestern University Twin Study. VII: The Mode of Delivery in Twin Pregnancy - North American Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

R. Depp ,
L.G. Keith  and
J.J. Sciarra
R. Depp
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical Schooland the Prentice Women's Hospital and Maternity Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
L.G. Keith*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical Schooland the Prentice Women's Hospital and Maternity Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
J.J. Sciarra
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical Schooland the Prentice Women's Hospital and Maternity Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
*
333 East Superior Street, Suite 476, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

No consensus exists for the optimal mode of delivery for twin fetuses. Opinions vary by type of institution (university medical center vs community hospital), country or continent (North America vs Western Europe) and personal preference of individual physicians. This article lists clinical considerations in arriving at the decision and presents them in the form of a decision tree.

Keywords

TwinsMode of deliveryCesarean sectionVaginal deliveryRisk factors
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 11 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1988

References

REFERENCES

1.Acker, D, Lieberman, M, Holbrook, RH, James, O, Phillippe, M, Edelin, KC (1982): Delivery of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 59:710–711.Google Scholar
2.Berglund, L, Axelsson, O (1984): Combined vaginal-abdominai delivery of twins. Ann Chir Gynaecol 73:232–235.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Barret, JM, Staggs, SM, Van Hooydonk, JE, Growdon, JH, Killam, AP, Boehm, FH (1982): The effect of type of delivery upon neonatal outcome in premature twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 143: 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Brown, EJ, Dixon, HG (1963): Twin pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 70:251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Buekens, P, Lagasse, R, Puissant, F, Leroy, F (1985): Do breech presentations in twins and singletons run different risk. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34:207–211.Google Scholar
6.Certrulo, CL, Ingardia, CJ, Sbarra, AJ (1980): Management of multiple gestation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 23:533–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Chervenak, FA, Johnson, RE, Berkowitz, RL, Hobbins, JC (1983): Intrapartum external version of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 62:160–165.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Cervenak, FA, Johnson, RE, Berkowitz, RL, Grannum, P, Hobbins, JC (1984): Is routine cesarean section necessary for vertex-breech and vertex-transverse twin gestations? Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:1–5.Google Scholar
9.Chevernak, FA, Johnson, RE, Youcha, S, Hobbins, JC, Berkowitz, RL (1985): Intrapartum management of twin gestation. Obstet Gynecol 65:119–124.Google Scholar
10.Cohen, HM (1982): Delivery of second twin. Obstet Gynecol 59: 667–668.Google Scholar
11.Collea, JV, Chein, C, Quilligan, EJ (1980): The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: A study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137:240–241.Google Scholar
12.Evrard, JR, Gold, EM (1981): Cesarean section for delivery of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 57:581–583.Google Scholar
13.Gimovsky, ML, Petiie, RH, Todd, WD (1980): Neonatal performance of the selected term vaginal breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 56:687–691.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Green, JE, McLean, F, Smith, LP, Usher, R (1982): Has an increased cesarean section rate for term breech delivery reduced the incidence of birth asphyxia, trauma, and death? Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:643–648.Google Scholar
15.Ho, SK, Wu, PYK (1975): Perinatal factors and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122:979–987.Google Scholar
16.Kauppila, A, Jouppila, P, Koivisto, M, et al (1975): Twin pregnancy: A clinical study of 335 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scan (uppl) 54:5–12.Google Scholar
17.Keith, L, Ellis, R, Berger, G, Depp, R (1980): The northwestern University multihospital twin study. I: A description of 588 twin pregnancies and associated pregnancy loss, 1971-1975. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138:781–789.Google Scholar
18.Kelsick, F, Minkoff, H (1982): Management of the breech second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144: 783–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Kelsick, F, Minkoff, H (1984): Letter to the editor - Reply to Dr. Borgatta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:120–121.Google Scholar
20.Koivisto, M, Jouppila, P, Kaupila, A, et al (1985): Twin pregnancy: Neonatal morbidity and mortality. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (Suppl) 54:21–29.Google Scholar
21.Olofsson, P, Rydhstrom, H (1985): Twin delivery: How should the second twin be delivered? Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:479–481.Google Scholar
22.Olofsson, P, Rydhstrom, H (1985): Management of second stage of labour in term twin delivery. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34:213–216.Google ScholarPubMed
23.Osbourne, GK, Patel, NB (1985): An assessment of perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies in Dundee. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34:193–199.Google ScholarPubMed
24.Rayburn, WF, Lavin, JP, Miodovnik, M, Varner, MW (1984): Time intervals in multiple gestation. Obstet Gynecol 63:502–506.Google Scholar
25.Ware, HH (1971): The second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110:865–873.Google Scholar
26.Young, BK, Suidan, J, Antoine, C, Silverman, F, Lustig, I, Wasserman, J (1985): Differences in twins: The importance of birth order. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:915–921.Google Scholar
27.Wittman, R, Keith, L, Method, M, Depp, R (1986) The Northwestern Multi-hospital Twin Study. VI: Factors relating to low apgar scores in twin delivery. Abstract. Fifth International Congress on Twin Studies, Amsterdam, 09 15-19, p 41.Google Scholar