Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:53:59.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

No Evidence for Genomic Imprinting in Liver-Born Down Syndrome Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

C. Stoll ,
Y. Alembik ,
B. Dott  and
J. Feingold
C. Stoll*
Affiliation:
Institut de Puériculture, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Strasbourg, France
Y. Alembik
Affiliation:
Inserm, U-15S, Paris, France
B. Dott
Affiliation:
Institut de Puériculture, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Strasbourg, France Inserm, U-15S, Paris, France
J. Feingold
Affiliation:
Inserm, U-15S, Paris, France
*
Institut de Puériculture, 23, rue de la Porte de l'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg Cedex, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite numerous studies, the clinical heterogeneity of Down syndrome has no explanation. We have attempted to investigate the role of genomic imprinting in the phenotype of liveborn Down syndrome patients. Hundred fifty eight patients were investigated for parental origin of the extra chromosome 21 with standard cytogenetic analyses and with DNA plymorphic markers. The extra chromosome 21 was of paternal origin in 8 cases and of maternal origin in 150 cases.

The phenotype of Down svndrome patients in whom the nondisjunction was of maternal origin, was not different from the phenotype of Down syndrome patients in whom the nondisjunction was of paternal origin.

We conclude that imprinting may probably not play a role in the heterogeneity of Down syndrome phenotype.

Keywords

Genomic imprintingDown syndromeChromosomal nondisjunction
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 45 , Issue 1-2 , April 1996 , pp. 265 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1996

References

REFERENCES

1. Wilson, GN, Hall, JG, de la Cruz, F: Genomic imprinting: Summary of an NICHD conference. Am J Med Genet 1993; 46: 675–680.Google Scholar
2. Stoll, C, Roth, MP: The northeastern France birth defects monitoring system; in: Marois, P (ed) Prevention of Physical and Mental Congenital Defects New York, Liss 1985; part. B. pp. 157–162.Google Scholar
3. Farkas, LG, Posnick, JC, Hrczko, T: Anthropometry of the head and face in 95 Down syndrome patients; in Epstern, (es): Morphogenesis of Down Syndrome. New York Wiley-Liss, 1991, pp. 53–97.Google Scholar
4. Hall, JG: Genomic imprinting: Review and relevance to human diseases. Am J Hum Genet 1990; 46: 857–873.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Cattanach, BM: Chromosome imprinting in the mouse. Mouse Newslett 1988; 82: 93.Google Scholar
6. Cattanach, BM: Imprinting of distal chromosomes 2 and lack of imprinting with distal chromosome 8. Mouse Newslett 1989; 83: 161–162.Google Scholar
7. Kirk, KM, Searle, AG: Phenotypic consequences of chromosome imbalance in the mouse; in Daniel, A (ed): The Cytogenetics of Mammalian Autosomal Rearrangements. New York, Liss, 1988, pp. 739–768.Google Scholar
8. Engel, E: Uniparental disomy revisited: The first twelve years. Am J Hum Genet 1993; 46: 670–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Blouin, JL, Avramopoulos, D, Pangalos, C, Antonarakis, SE: Normal phenotype with paternal uniparental isodisomy for chromosome 21. Am J Hum Genet 1993; 53: 1074–1078.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Henderson, DJ, Sherman, LS, Loughna, SC, Bennet, PR, Moore, GE: Early embryonic failure associated with uniparental disomy for human chromosome 21. Hum Mol Genet 1994; 3: 1371–1376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Niikawa Kajii, T: The origin of mosaic Down syndrome: Four cases with chromosome markers. Am J Hum Genet 1984; 36: 123–130.Google Scholar
12. Petersen, MB, Bartsch, O, Adelsberger, PA, Mikkelsen, M, Sewinger, E, Antonarakis, SE: Uniparental isodisomy due to duplication of chromosome 21 occuring in somatic cells monosomic for chromosome 21. Genomics 1992; 13: 269–274.Google Scholar
13. Antonarakis, SE and the Down Syndrone Collaborative Group: Parental origin of extra 21. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 872–876.Google Scholar