Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:07:15.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Method for Representing Mental Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Ronald S. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Louisville Twin Study, Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Kentucky
*
Louisville Twin Study, Department of Pediatrics, Health Sciences Center, University of Louisville, KY 40292, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A new method is described for plotting the growth in mental development from birth to adolescence. Using data from a large sample of twins followed since birth, a dimension of mental growth was constructed by arraying all tests in order of difficulty, then computing the average gain from age to age. The gain was expressed in standard-deviation units, which reflected the upward shift in the score distribution from time X to time X + 1. When cumulated over ages, the scores generated a mental growth curve for the sample as a whole, as well as for each case individually. The curves displayed a very rapid gain in mental growth over the first 24 months of life, with the complexity of mental functions advancing by nearly 20 standard deviations from birth to two years. Thereafter the gain progressively tapered off until reaching a final increment of 0.5 SD gain between 15 years and adulthood. At this point, the terminal level of mental growth reached an average value of 31 SD units, with a spread of individual differences equal to ± 3 SD units. The scores at each age represented a combination of base level plus gain from the preceding age, and during infancy the gain scores were large in relation to base. At later ages, however, the gain scores were comparatively small, both in absolute terms and in relation to base. These characteristics help explain the typical low-order correlations obtained among mental test scores during infancy, vs the progressively larger correlations obtained at later ages.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1987

References

REFERENCES

1.Anderson, JE (1939): The limitations of infant and preschool tests in the measurement of intelligence. Journal of Psychology, 8: 351379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bayley, N (1955): On the growth of intelligence. American Psychologist 10: 805818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bayley, N (1969): Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
4.Blinkoov, S, Glezer, II (1985): The human brain in figures and tables: A quantitative handbook. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
5.McCall, RB, Eichorn, DH, Hogarty, PS (1977): Transitions in early mental development. Monographs of the Society for Child Development 42: 1108. (Serial No. 171).Google Scholar
6.Roff, M (1941): A statistical study of the development of intelligence test performance. Journal of Psychology 11: 371386.Google Scholar
7.Wilson, RS (1978): Synchronies in mental development: An epigenetic perspective. Science 202: 939948.Google Scholar
8.Wilson, RS (1983): The Louisville Twin Study: Developmental synchronies in behavior. Child Development 54: 298316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed