Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:56:48.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetics of Essential Hypertension–Historical perspective and current concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Julius Bauer
Julius Bauer*
Affiliation:
Loma Linda University and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif
*
1680 Vine Street, Los Angeles 900-28, Calif., U.S.A.

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Essential hypertension was first recognized as morbid entity in 1911 and the word “essential” was substituted by “constitutional” in 1933. Diastolic hypertension may be constitutional or “symptomatic” if it belongs to the symptoms of a disease of specific organs (kidneys, endocrine, metabolic disease, cerebral or vascular disease). It is futile to search for such a diseased specific organ in constitutional hypertension (1933). Constitutional hypertension is a constitutional variant due to insufficient perfection of the homeostatic (feed-back) system maintaining the habitual blood pressure at a constant normal level. It is of multifactorial (polygenic) etiology (1960). It is a definite predisposition to actual diseases. It is a matter of semantics whether or not it should be called a disease of its own. The syntropy of constitutional hypertension and diabetes, obesity and arteriosclerosis is best explained by sharing various parts of polygenomes that are the common genetic basis of each of these morbid states.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 577 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1968

References

Bauer, J. (1933). Über arteriellen Hochdruck. Wien. Med. Woch., 46.Google Scholar
Bauer, J. (1941). Essential hypertension, its nature and etiology. Acta Med. Scand., 108: 18.Google Scholar
Bauer, J. (1942). Constitution and Disease. Grune & Stratton. Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Bauer, J. (1960). Pathogenesis and clinical significance of constitutional hypertension. Angiology, 11: 499.Google Scholar
Bauer, J. (1967). Differential Diagnosis of Internal Diseases. 3d Ed., Grune & Stratton Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Bradley, St. (1948). Physiology of essential hypertension. Amer. J. Med., 4: 398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, E. (1911). In Fishberg, A. M.: Hypertension and Nephritis. 4th Ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Page, I. H. (1963). The nature of arterial hypertension. Arch. Intern. Med., 111: 103.Google Scholar
Frank, E. (1967). The mosaic theory of arterial hypertension — Its interpretation. Perspect. Biol. Med., 10: 325.Google Scholar
Pickering, G. (1961). The Nature of Essential Hypertension. Grune & Stratton Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Platt, R. (1959). The nature of essential hypertension. Lancet, 2: 55, 1092.Google Scholar