Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:46:13.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Expectations of Polar Body Twinning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

D.E. Goldgar  and
W.J. Kimberling
D.E. Goldgar
Affiliation:
Division of Medical Genetics, Boys Town Institute, Omaha, Nebraska Department of Biometrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
W.J. Kimberling*
Affiliation:
Division of Medical Genetics, Boys Town Institute, Omaha, Nebraska Department of Otolaryngology, Creighton University, Medical School, Omaha, Nebraska
*
Boys Town Institute, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, NE 68131, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The expected correlation between polar body twins depends upon the frequency and distribution of chiasmata occurring during oogenesis. We have estimated the expected values of these correlations using assumptions believed to be biologically valid. The expected value of the overall correlation between first polar body twins is estimated to be 0.38 and that between second polar body twins is estimated to be 0.51. There is little difference between the correlation of DZ twins and that expected for second polar body twins.

The correlation for a specific locus depends upon its distance from the centromere for both types of polar body twins. This effect is especially marked for second polar body twins. For second polar body twins, loci at or near the telomere will have a correlation close to that expected for first polar body twins. It is concluded that only those marker genes that lie at or close to the centromere are appropriate for the detection of polar body twinning.

Keywords

Polar body twinningGenetic correlationChiasmataOogenesis
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1981 , pp. 257 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1981

References

REFERENCES

1. Cook, PJL, Noades, J, Hopkinson, DA, Robson, EB (1972): Demonstration of a sex difference in recombination fraction in the loose linkage, Rh and PGM1 . Ann Hum Genet 35:239–242.Google Scholar
2. Elston, RC, Boklage, CE (1978): An examination of fundamental assumptions of the twin method. In “Progress in Clinical and Biological Research: Twin Studies,” Nance, WE, Allen, G, and Parisi, P (eds): New York: Alan R. Liss, Part A, pp 189–200.Google Scholar
3. Fenger, K, Sorenson, SA (1975): Evaluation of a possible sex difference in recombination for the ABO-AK linkage. Am J Hum Genet 27:784–788.Google Scholar
4. Hulten, M (1974): Chiasma distribution at diakinesis in the normal human male. Hereditas 76:55–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Morton, NE, Rao, DC, Lindstein, J, Hulten, M, Yee, S (1977): A chiasma map of man. Hum Hered 27:38–51.Google Scholar
6. Renwick, JH (1971): The mapping of human chromosomes. Ann Rev Genet 5:81–120.Google Scholar
7. Suarez, B, Reich, T, Fishman, PM (1979): Variability in sib pair genetic identity. Hum Hered 29:37–41.Google Scholar