Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:53:01.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Estimation of Probandwise Concordance in Twins: The Effect of Unequal Ascertainment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

K.S. Kendler  and
L.J. Eaves
K.S. Kendler*
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University/Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, USA Department of Human Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University/Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, USA
L.J. Eaves
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University/Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, USA
*
Box 710 MCV Station, Richmond, VA 23298-0710, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This report examines the impact of two major kinds of unequal ascertainment on the estimation of true probandwise concordance (Cpbt ) in twin studies: 1) concordance-dependent – where the ascertainment rate differs in affected members of concordant vs discordant pairs, and 2) non-independent – where ascertainment rates differ in affected members of concordant pairs where the cotwin has vs has not been ascertained. Concordance-dependent ascertainment is easily modeled algebraically; non-independent ascertainment is more complex and we here propose a model based on survival analysis. Overall, concordance-dependent ascertainment produces greater bias in estimates of probandwise concordance than does non-independent ascertainment. The bias introduced by concordance-dependent ascertainment is greatest when Cpbt is low and/or when the ascertainment rate for twins in concordant pairs is low. The bias introduced by non-independent ascertainment is greatest when Cpbt is high and/or when the ascertainment probability for an affected twin in a concordant pair where the cotwin has already been ascertained approaches unity. The impact of concordance-dependent and non-independent ascertainment on estimates of heritability and common environment is examined. Correction terms to estimate Cpbt in the presence of concordance-dependent and/or non-independent ascertainment are presented.

Keywords

ConcordanceAscertainmentSurvival analysisTwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 38 , Issue 3-4 , October 1989 , pp. 253 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1989

References

REFERENCES

1. Allen, G, Harvald, B, Shields, J (1967): Measures of twin concordance. Acta Genet 17:475–481.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Allen, G, Hrubec, Z (1979): Twin concordance: A more general model. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:3–13.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Crow, JF (1965): Problems of ascertainment in the analysis of family data. In Neel, JV, Shaw, MW, Schull, WJ (eds): Genetics and the Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health, Education & Welfare, pp 23–44.Google Scholar
4. Greenberg, DA (1986): The effect of proband designation on segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet 39:329–339.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Holm, NV (1983): A note on ascertainment probability in the Allen/Hrubec twin model. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 32:37–47.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Hrubec, Z (1973): The effect of diagnostic ascertainment in twins on the assessment of the genetic factor in disease etiology. Am J Hum Genet 25:15–28.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Nichols, FW (1982): Simple segregation analysis: A review of its history and terminology. J Hered 73:444–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rice, J, Gottesman, II, Suarez, BK, O'Rourke, DH, Reich, T (1982): Ascertainment bias for non-twin relatives in twin proband studies. Hum Hered 32:202–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Smith, C (1974) Concordance in twins: Methods and interpretation. Am J Hum Genet 26:454–466.Google ScholarPubMed