Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:32:41.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Essential Nonmedical Perinatal Services for Multiple Birth Families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

P.E. Malmstrom ,
T. Faherty  and
P. Wagner
P.E. Malmstrom*
Affiliation:
Twinline, Berkeley, California, USA
T. Faherty
Affiliation:
Twinline, Berkeley, California, USA
P. Wagner
Affiliation:
Twinline, Berkeley, California, USA
*
Director, Twinline, P.O. Box 10066, Berkeley, CA 94709, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Parents of multiples suffer unique stresses which can severely impair family health and welfare. Access to information, counseling, and community resources increase parents' abilities to cope, and reduce the risk of child and spousal abuse. Twinline, a social service agency in Califormia, provides a variety of free and low-cost nonmedical perinatal services to meet the needs of a heterogeneous population of over 1,000 multiple birth families and parents expecting multiples in the urban and rural counties of the San Francisco Bay Area.

Keywords

TwinsFamily stressPerinatal careSocial services
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 193 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1988

References

REFERENCES

1.Chamberlin, R (1984): Strategies for disease prevention and promotion in maternal and child health: the “ecologic” versus the “high risk” approach. Publ Health 185–197.Google Scholar
2.Goshen–Gottstein, ER (1980): The mothering of twins, triplets and quadruplets. Psychiatry 43:189–203.Google Scholar
3.Katz, M (1986): The problems of preterm birth. Preterm Labor and Birth Prevention an Management Conference, 06 2, 1986, Children's Hospital, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
4.Keith, L, Hugh, MJ (1979): Twin gestation. In: Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol 2. Baltimore: Harper and Row, Chap 74.Google Scholar
5.Leonard, L (1985): Positive approaches to multiple pregnancy. Double Feature 8:4–6.Google Scholar
6.Malmstrom, PEM, Wedge, MW, Faherty, T, Wagner, P (1986): Respite care: a Lifeline for low–income multiple birth families (Abstract). Acta Genet Med Gemellol 35:207.Google Scholar
7.Nelson, H, Martin, C (1985): Increased child abuse in twins. A report from the Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky.Google Scholar
8.Noble, E (1980): Having Twins. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co, p 71.Google Scholar
9.O'Brien, P, Hay, D (1983): Is rearing twins different? The development and needs of multiple birth children and their families from birth to school age. LaTrobe Twin Study.Google Scholar
10.Papiernik, E, Mussy, MA, Vial, M, Richard, A (1985): A low rate of perinatal deaths for twin births. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34:201–206.Google ScholarPubMed
11.POMBA (1979): The Impact of a Multiple Birth on the Family in Home Help and Social Services. Alberta: Parents of Multiple Births Association.Google Scholar
12.POMBA (1985): Preliminary report from the survey on multiple pregancy. Double Feature 8:10.Google Scholar
13.Rust, KJ, Rust, FP, Williams, RL (1986): 1979-1983 maternal and child health data base descriptive narrative. Health Data Research Facility Community and Organization Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
14.Siegel, SJ, Siegel, MM (1982): Pratical aspects of pediatric management of families with twins. PIR 4:8–12.Google Scholar
15. Twinline (1983): The needs of multiple birth families. Testimony to the U.S. Children's Select Committee Hearing, Los Angeles, California, 12 21.Google Scholar