Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:11:35.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Epidemiology of Conjoined Twins in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

E.E. Castilla*
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell Biology, La Plata, Argentina
J.S. Lopez-Camelo
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell Biology, La Plata, Argentina
I.M. Orioli
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
O. Sánchez
Affiliation:
Medical Genetics Unit, Electron Microscopy Center, University of Oriente Medical School, Ciudad Bolívar, Venezuela
J.E. Paz
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell Biology, La Plata, Argentina
*
GENETICA/FIOCRUZ, C.P. 926, 21.040 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twenty–three cases of symmetrical conjoined twins were registered by the Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECLAMC) in 1,714,952 births, which were observed during the 1967-1986 period in 95 maternity hospitals distributed in eleven Latin-American countries. This results in a birth prevalence rate of about 1/75,000 births. The secular and geographic distribution of this material do not depart from random in spite of one hospital with three cases, and two hospitals with two cases each, within a short time period. These 23 cases include one diprosopus, 3 dicephalus, one ischiopagus, 5 pygopagus, none dipygus, 3 syncephalus, none craniopagus, 9 thoracopagus, one omphalopagus, and none rachipagus. Sex distribution is even, with 12 male and 11 female cases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1988

References

REFERENCES

1.Bheattay, E, Nelson, MM, Beighton, P (1975): Epidemic of conjoined twins in southern Africa? Lancet 2: 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Castilla, EE, Orioli, IM (1983): El Estudio Colaborativo Latinoamericano de Malformaciones Congénitas: ECLAMC/MONITOR. Interciencia 8: 271278.Google Scholar
3.Castilla, EE, Orioli, IM, Lopez-Camelo, JS (1985): On monitoring the multiply malformed infant: I. Case-finding, case-recording, and dat a handling in a Latin-American program. Am J Med Genet 22: 717726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Guttmacher, MD, Nichols, BL (1967): Teratology of conjoined twins. Birth Defects: Orig Art Ser 3: 19.Google Scholar
5.Källén, B, Rybo, G (1978): Conjoined twins in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 57: 257259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Milham, S Jr, (1966): Symmetrical conjoined twins: An analysis of the birth records of twenty-two sets. J Pediat 69: 643652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Nichols, BL (1979): Conjoined twins. In Bergsma, D. (ed): Birth Defects Compendium, 2nd Edition. New York: Alan R Liss Inc.Google Scholar
8.Rosa, FW, Hernandez, C, Carlo, WA (1986): Griseofulvin teratology, including two thoracopagus conjoined twins. Lancet 1: 171.Google Scholar