Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:26:33.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electroencephalographic Findings in MZ Twin Pairs, Discordant for Closed Head Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Ilmar A. Sulg  and
Sven J. Dencker
Ilmar A. Sulg*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Lund
Sven J. Dencker
Affiliation:
Dept. of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Lund
*
Dept. of Clinical Neurophysiology, Lasarettet, Lund (Sweden)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A follow-up EEG study in 28 cases with closed head injuries, using MZ co-twins as controls, is described. A new concept in EEG analysis is introduced. A combined EEG code and point scale are more effective in discriminating subtle differences between two EEG records. A high concordance was found whether the EEG showed normal or abnormal patterns. Not only the head-injured twins but also the controls showed more abnormalities than in the normal population. Without this check by co-twins the EEG abnormalities could have been taken for persisting signs of the proband injury. It was found, however, in late follow-up that proband twins showed more EEG aberrations and abnormalities than co-twins, but the probands differed already in pre-traumatic mental make-up from their genetically identical controls. Neither differences in mental make-up nor in EEG characteristics showed any statistically significant correlation with the severity of the proband injury. These observations limit the significance of EEG abnormalities in late concussional states.

This study also indicates that there are individually specific EEG patterns, which in health retain their characteristics throughout life. The EEG pattern is therefore concordant in identical twins. Thus, when a twin is influenced by a brain disease or lesion, the co-twin may serve as a biological control in both acute and follow-up studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1968 , pp. 389 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1968

References

Barslund, I., Danielsen, J. (1963). Temporal epilepsy in monozygotic twins. Epilepsia, 4: 138–150.Google Scholar
Cobb, W.A. (1963). Cerebral trauma. In Hill, D. and Parr, G.: Electroencephalography. 2nd Ed., Me Donald, London.Google Scholar
Dencker, S.J. (1958). A follow-up study of 128 closed head injuries in twins using co-twins as controls. Acta Psychiat. Scand., 33: Suppl. 123: 1–125.Google Scholar
Dencker, S.J. (1960). Closed head injury in twins. Neurologic, psychometric, and psychiatric follow-up study of consecutive cases, using co-twins as controls. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 2: 569–575.Google Scholar
Dencker, S.J. (1963). Closed head injury in monozygotic twins. II. Intrapair variation in psychiatric and social variables. In: Year Book of University of Lund, 58: Suppl. 15: 1–39.Google Scholar
Dencker, S.J. Hauge, M., Kaij, L., Nielsen, A. (1961). The use of anthropological traits and blood groups in the determination of the zygosity of twins. Acta Genet., 11: 265–285.Google Scholar
Denny-Brown, D. (1945). Disability arising from closed head injury. J. Amer. Med., Ass., 127: 429–436.Google Scholar
Dunn, P.M. (1965). Some perinatal observations on twins. Develop. Med. Child Neurol., 7: 121–134.Google Scholar
Essen-Möller, E. (1941). Empirische Ähnlichkeitsdiagnose bei Zwillingen. Hereditas, 27: 1–50.Google Scholar
Essen-Möller, E. (1957). Some applications of the twin method to psychiatry. Jap. J. Hum. Genet., 2: 14–16.Google Scholar
Gibbs, F.A., Wegner, W.R., Gibbs, E.L. (1944). The electroencephalogram in post-traumatic epilepsy. Amer.J. Psychiat., 100: 738–749.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, M. (1943). The EEG in late post-traumatic cases. Amer. J. Psychiat., 100: 378–386.Google Scholar
Gürtler, H. Tabeller til Brug ved blodtypestatistisk Vurdering af Paternitetssager. (Unpubl.)Google Scholar
Lennox, W.G., Gibbs, E.L., Gibbs, F.A. (1945). The brain-wave pattern; a hereditary trait. J. Hered., 36: 233–243.Google Scholar
Olsen, A., Rossen, R. (1950). Neuropsychiatrie and laboratory observations in 147 patients following craniocerebral injuries. Minn. Med., 33: 233–240.Google Scholar
Steinmann, H.W., Tönnis, W. (1951). Das EEG bei frischen gedeckten Hirnschädigungen. Deutsch. Z. Nervenheilk., 165: 22–29.Google Scholar
Vogel, F. (1958). Ueber die Erblichkeit des normalen Electroenzephalogramms. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Waardenburg, P.J. (1957). The twin-study method in wider perspective. Proceed. First Internat. Congr. Hum. Genet., 7: 10–20.Google Scholar
Weber, R. (1954). Die Brauchbarkeit des EEG beim Schädeltrauma. Münch. Med. Wschr., 96: 1001–1014.Google Scholar