Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:12:27.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Breech Presentations in Twins and Singletons Run Different Risks?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

P. Buekens ,
R. Lagasse ,
F. Puissant  and
F. Leroy
P. Buekens*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Brussels
R. Lagasse
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Brussels
F. Puissant
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Pierre Hospital, Free University, Brussels
F. Leroy
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Pierre Hospital, Free University, Brussels
*
Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have compared breech twins and breech single births in a population recorded between 1974 and 1978 in 10 Belgian maternity centers. In 190 twin pregnancies, 38 first and 65 second twins were delivered in breech presentation. These twins were compared to 853 singleton breeches, of which 95 delivered by cesarean section were excluded. Data were stratified according to birthweight. No significant difference between twins and singletons was found in terms of perinatal mortality rates. However, Apgar scores below 7 at 5 minutes were significantly less numerous among first twins than among singletons. Therefore, first twins in breech presentation might be at lower risk of fetal distress. This difference should be taken into account in the management of first twins presenting by the breech.

Keywords

Breech presentationTwin pregnancyPerinatal mortalityApgar Score
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 34 , Issue 3-4 , October 1985 , pp. 207 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1985

References

REFERENCES

1. Cetrulo, CL, Ingardia, CJ, Sbarra, AJ (1980): Management of multiple gestation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 23:533–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Chevernak, FA, Johnson, RE, Berkowitz, RL, Grannum, P, Hobbins, JC (1984): Is routine cesarean section necessary for vertex-breech and vertex-transverse twin gestations? Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cruikshank, DP, Pitkin, RM (1977): Delivery of the premature breech. Obstet Gynecol 50:367–369.Google ScholarPubMed
4. De crespigny, LJC, Pepperell, RJ (1979): Perinatal mortality and morbidity in breech presentation. Obstet Gynecol 53:141–145.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Dunn, P (1976): Maternal and fetal aetiological factors. Proceeding of 5th Eur Congr Perinatal Med Uppsala, p 77–81.Google Scholar
6. Goldenberg, RL, Nelson, KG (1977): The premature breech. Am J Obstet Gynecol 127:240–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Grandjean, H, Papiemik, E (1983): Multicentric study on twin pregnancies: mode of delivery. Europ J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol 15:272–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Heluin, G, Papiernik, E, Berardi, JC, Frydman, R (1979): Delivery in twin pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:361–362.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Heluin, G, Papiernik, E (1981): Spontaneous or systematically induced labor for the termination of twin pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 30:285–288.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Kaip, LE, Doney, JR, Me Carthy, T, Meis, PJ, Hall, M (1979): The premature breech: trial of labor or cesarean section? Obstet Gynecol 53:88–92.Google Scholar
11. Kauppila, O, Grönroos, M, Aro, P, Aittoniemi, P, Kuoppala, M (1981): Management of low birth weight breech delivery: Should cesarean section be routine? Obstet Gynecol 57:289–294.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Kelsick, F, Minkoff, H (1982): Management of the breech second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144: 783–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Kubli, F, Rüttgers, H (1980): Malpresentation. In Vokaer, R. and Levi, S. (eds): Les Grossesses à Haut Risque. Paris: Masson, p 281–288.Google Scholar
14. Leroy, F (1963): Risque foetal et conduite obstétricale dans les grossesse gémellaires. Bull Soc Roy Belge Gynecol Obstet 33:281–309.Google Scholar
15. Lyons, ER, Papsin, FR (1978): Cesarean section in the management of breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130:558–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Me Keown, L, Record, RG (1953): The influence of placental size on foetal growth in man with special reference to multiple pregnancy. J Endocrinol 9:418–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth (1981) Obstet Gynecol 57:537–545.Google Scholar
18. Persson, PH, Grennert, L (1979): Diagnosis and treatment of twin pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:311–317.Google ScholarPubMed