Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:05:09.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Discussion of the Zygosity and Asymmetries of Two Pairs of Conjoined Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2016

Norma Ford Walker
Norma Ford Walker*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto and Department of Genetics, Hospital for Sick Children

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , March 1952 , pp. 136 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1952

References

Cummins, H., and Mairs, G. T., Finger prints of conjoined twins: differences in Gibb twins and their genetic significance. Jour. Heredity, 1934, 25: 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, H. & Midlo, C., Finger Prints, Palms and Soles, an Introduction to Dermatoglyphics. Philadelphia, Blakiston. 1943. pp. xi, 309.Google Scholar
Gedda, L., Studio dei Gemelli. Edizioni Orizzonte Medico. Roma, 1951, pp. xvi, 1381.Google Scholar
Jones, S. H., Younghusband, O. Z., Evans, J. A.Human parabiotic pygopagus twins with hypertension. Report of a case with clinical, psychologic and endocrinologie observations. J. Amer. Med. Ass. 1948, 138: 642–645.Google Scholar
Newman, H. H., Palm-print patterns in twins. On the use of dermatoglyphics as an aid in the diagnosis of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. J. Hered., 1931-a., 22: 40–49.Google Scholar
Newman, H. H., Differences between conjoined twins, in relation to a general theory of twinning. J. Hered., 1931-b, 22: 200–215.Google Scholar
Newman, H. H., The question of mirror imaging in human one-egg twins. Human Biol. 1940, 12: 21–34.Google Scholar
Owen, R. D., Davis, H. P. and Mofgan, R. F., Quintuplet calves and erythrocyte mosaicism. Jour. Heredity, 1946, 37: 291–297.Google Scholar
Plaggemeyer, H. W. & Selby, J. H., A urologie and radiographic study of the Samar twins. With a view to surgical separation of the bodies. Surg. Gynec. Obs., 1920, 30: 269–272.Google Scholar
Stockard, C. R., Developmental rate and structural expression: an experimental study of twins, double monsters and single deformities, and the interaction among embryonic organs during their origin and development. Am. J. Anat., 1921, 28: 115–226.Google Scholar
Sullivan, L. R., The Samar united twins. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1919, 11: 21–24.Google Scholar
Walker, N. F., A study of zygosity in twins. 1951. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Wilder, H. H., Palm and sole studies. V. Frictionskin correspondence in pygopagi. Biol. Bull. 1916, 30: 211–226.Google Scholar