Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:36:54.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic Efficiency of Fingerprint and Blood Group Differences in a Series of Twins*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

G. Allen
G. Allen*
Affiliation:
Lab. of Socio-environmental Studies, NIMH, U.S. Public Health Service, Bethesda, Md.
*
Laboratory of Socio-environmental Studies, National Institute of Mental Health U.S. Public Health Service, Bethesda, Md. 20014 (U.S.A.)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Data obtained in a study of mentally defective twins permitted the examination of interdependence and efficiency of blood groups and fingerprints in zygosity diagnosis. After exclusion of Down's syndrome, the series consisted of 49 MZ pairs, 52 DZ pairs and 18 pairs of uncertain type.

Same-sex pairs discordant for Down's syndrome seemed to include some pairs of uniovular or irregular origin, but this could not be investigated cytologically. Concordance appeared to occur independently in different blood group systems. However, DZ twins concordant in the ABO blood groups were significantly more similar in their fingerprints than were other pairs, and the within-pair differences were more uniform.

Linear discriminant functions designed for zygosity diagnosis make much better use of dermatoglyphic information than do simpler measures, and the latter could not be much improved by comparing left and right hands separately.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1968 , pp. 359 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1968

Footnotes

*

The data used in this analysis were collected in a cooperative study undertaken by the Department of Medical Genetics of the New York State Psychiatric Institute and the National Institute of Mental Health. Franz J . Kallmann initiated the research and provided guidance until his death in 1965. The New York State Schools provided reports of twin admissions, facilities for examinations and, in some instances, laboratory tests.

References

Allen, G., Baroff, G. S. (1955). Mongoloid twins and their siblings. Acta Genet., 5: 294–326.Google Scholar
Allen, G., Kallmann, F. J. (1962). Etiology of mental subnormality in twins. In Kallmann: Expanding Goals of Genetics in Psychiatry. 174: 211. Grune & Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
Cederlöf, R. et al. (1961). Studies on similarity diagnosis in twins with the aid of mailed questionnaires. Acta Genet., 11: 338–362.Google ScholarPubMed
Ceppellini, R. et al. (1955). The estimation of gene frequencies in a random-mating population. Ann. Hum. Genet., 20: 97–115.Google Scholar
Dekaban, A. (1965). Twins, probably monozygotic: one mongoloid with 48 chromosomes, the other normal. Cytogenetics, 4: 227–239.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. H., Winoham, J. (1967). Data on linkage between the locus determining placental alkaline phosphatase (Pi) and other markers. Ann. Hum. Genet., 30: 233–237.Google Scholar
Essen-Möller, E. (1941). Empirische Ähnlichkeitsdiagnose bei Zwillingen. Hereditas, 27: 1–50.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1948). The estimation of gene frequencies from family records. Heredity, 2: 199–218, 369–389.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1940). The estimation of the proportion of récessives from tests carried out on a sample not wholly unrelated. Ann. Eugen., 10: 160–170.Google Scholar
Holt, S. B. (1961). Quantitative genetics of finger-print patterns. Brit. Med. Bull., 17: 247–250.Google Scholar
Juel-Nielsen, N. et al. (1958). On the diagnosis of zygosity in twins and the value of blood groups. Acta Genet., 8: 256–273.Google Scholar
Lamy, M., et al. (1957). Le nombre de dermatoglyphes dans un échantillon de jumeaux. Ann. Hum. Genet., 21: 374–396.Google Scholar
MacArthur, J. W. (1938). Reliability of dermatoglyphics in twin diagnosis. Hum. Biol., 10: 12–35.Google Scholar
Nichols, R. C., Bilbro, W. C. Jr. (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet., 16: 265–275.Google ScholarPubMed
Nixon, W. L. B. (1956). On the diagnosis of twin-pair ovularity and the use of dermatoglyphic data. In Gedda, L.: Novant'anni delle Leggi Mendeliane. 235–245. Ed. Istituto Mendel, Rome.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. H. (1958). Serology in physical anthropology. Technical problems as revealed by repeated blood determinations in twins. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 16: 187–195.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. H., De George, F. V. (1957). Selective survival in dizygotic twins in relation to the ABO blood groups. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 9: 321–330.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. H., De George, F. V. (1959). Genetic Basis of Morphological Variation. Harvard Univ. Press. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Richter, D. L., Geisser, S. (1960). A statistical model for diagnosing zygosis by ridge-count. Biometrics, 16: 110–114.Google Scholar
Rogers, B. O., Allen, G. (1955). Intolerance of dizygotic human twins to reciprocal skin homografts. Science, 122: 158.Google Scholar
Slater, E. (1963). Diagnosis of zygosity by fingerprints. Acta Psychiat. Scand., 39: 78–84.Google Scholar
Slater, E. Shields, J. (1953). Psychotic and Neurotic Illnesses in Twins. Med. Res. Council Special Report Series No. 278. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Penrose, L. S. (1955). Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis. Ann. Hum. Genet., 19: 273–289.Google Scholar
Walker, N. F. (1957). The use of dermal configurations in the diagnosis of mongolism. J. Pediat., 50: 19–26.Google Scholar
Wendt, G. G. (1955). Der individuelle Musterwert der Fingerleisten und seine Vererbung. A.Ge.Me.Ge., 4: 330–337.Google Scholar
Wiener, A. S., Leff, I. L. (1940). Chances of establishing the non-identity of biovular twins, with special reference to individuality tests of the blood. Genetics, 25: 187–196.Google Scholar