Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:05:05.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dermatoglyphics of Twins: A Study based on a new Systematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Bo Brismar
Bo Brismar*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Forensic-Anthropological Genetics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The Author has investigated on a twin material of 34 twin pairs the papillary line patterns on the fingers, the interdigital areas of the palms, and the hallucal area of the soles according to a systematics accounted for by the Author in earlier works.

2. The diagnosis of zygosity has been based on a comparison for the morphological particularities and on blood group analyses, in the cases in which the relative chance for dizygosity for the concordant pairs has been calculated.

3. The frequency distribution for the papillary line patterns of the twin pairs showed no significant divergence with respect to the large Swedish population, earlier investigated.

4. The 19 MZ twin pairs showed a concordance of 84.2-89.5% for the total qualitative value, total ridge-count and for the hallucal patterns.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1968 , pp. 375 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1968

References

Bonnevie, K. (1924). Studies on papillary patterns of human finger. J. Genet., 15: 1.Google Scholar
Brismar, B. (1965). Dermatoglyphics in the hallucal area of the sole. Mother/child correlation. A.Ge.Me.Ge., 14: 86.Google Scholar
Brismar, B. (1965). Qualitative value in finger prints. Mother/child correlation. A.Ge.Me.Ge., 14: 421.Google Scholar
Brismar, B. (1966). Palm prints. The patterns in the interdigital spaces. A.Ge.Me.Ge., 15: 314.Google Scholar
Cummins, H., Midlo, C. (1961). Finger Prints, Palms and Soles. Dover Publ., New York.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. (1951). Standard calculations for evaluating a blood-group system. Heredity, 5: 95.Google Scholar
Geipel, G. (1952). Die Konkordanz der Fussohlenmerkmale bei Zwillingen, ein Versuch des Nachweises ihrer Erblichkeit. Z. Morph. Antrop., 44: 70.Google Scholar
Holt, S. (1955). Genetics of dermal ridges: frequency distributions of total finger ridge-count. Ann. Hum. Genet. (London), 20: 270.Google Scholar
Holt, S. Quantitative genetics of dermal ridge-patterns on fingers. Acta Genet. (Basel), 6: 473, 1956/1957.Google Scholar
Lundström, A. (1954). The importance of genetic and nongenetic factors in the facial skeleton studied in 100 pairs of twins. Europ. Orthod. Soc., 92.Google Scholar
Smith, M., Penrose, L. (1955). Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis. Ann. Hum. Genet. (London), 19: 273.Google Scholar
Steffens, C. (1938) Uber Zehenleisten bei Zwillingen. Z. Morph. Anthrop., 37: 218.Google Scholar
Wilder, H. Palms and soles. Amer. J. Anat., 1: 423, 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, H. (1904). Racial differences in palm and sole configuration. Amer. Anthrop., 6: 244.Google Scholar