Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:41:27.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dermatoglyphics in the Hallucal Area of the Sole A Mother/Child Correlation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Bo Brismar*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Forensic-Anthropological Genetics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (Sweden)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The author has systematized the hallucal dermatoglyphics in accordance with the pattern direction in whorl, longitudinal, transverse, and open-field patterns Neither sex difference nor any difference between the right/left foot could be demonstrated. A correlation with χ2-distribution mother/child gave for:

1. longitudinal/transverse pattern χ2=49.0;

2. longitudinal/whorl pattern χ2=12.3;

3. transverse/whorl pattern χ2=6.3.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1965

References

Bonnevie, K.: Lassen sich die Papillarmuster der Fingerbeere für Vaterschaftsfragen praktisch verwerten. Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie, 51, 539, 1927.Google Scholar
Cummins, H.: Dermatoglyphics of Bushmen (South Africa). Am. Journ. of Phys. Anthropol., 13, 699, 1955.Google Scholar
Cummins, H. Midlo, C.: Finger prints, palms and soles. New York: Dover Publications, 1961.Google Scholar
Eriksson, S. & Posener, R.: Papillarlinjemönstren i fotsulans halluxzon. Nordisk kriminalteknisk tidskrift no. 1, 1962.Google Scholar
Geipel, G.: Die Konkordanz der Fussohlenmerkmale bei Zwillingen, ein Versuch des Nachweises ihrer Erblichkeit. Zeitschr. für Morph, und Anthropol., 44, 70, 1952.Google Scholar
Holt, S.: Genetics of dermal ridges: frequency distributions of total finger ridge-count. Ann. Hum. Genet., London 20, 270, 1955.Google Scholar
Holt, S. The correlations between ridge-counts on different fingers estimated from a population sample. Ann. Hum. Genet., London 23, 459, 1958.Google Scholar
Jones, F.: Structure and function as seen in the foot. London, Baillière Tindall & Cox, 1949.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W.: Über das Hautleistensystem in einer Sippe mit multiplen Missbildungen an Händen und Füssen. Zeitschr. für Morph, und Anthropol., 46, 189, 1954.Google Scholar
Martin, R. & Saller, K.: Lehrbuch der Anthropologie, 3, 19231962.Google Scholar
Penrose, L.: The distal triradius t on the hands of parents and sibs of mongol imbecils. Ann. Hum. Genet., London 19, 10, 1954.Google Scholar
Walker, N.: The use of dermal configurations in the diagnosis of mongolism. Journ. of Ped. 50, 19, 1957.Google Scholar
Wighmann, D.: Zur Genetik des Hautleistensystems der Fussohle. Zeitschr. für Morph. und Anthropol. 47, 331, 1956.Google Scholar
Wilder, H.: Palms and soles. The Am. Journ. of Anatomy, 1, 423, 1902.Google Scholar
Wilder, H. Racial differences in palm and sole configuration. Am. Anthropol. 6, 244, 1904.Google Scholar
Wilder, H. Palm and sole studies. Biol. Bulletin, 30, 135, 1916.Google Scholar
Wilder, H. Racial differences in palm and sole configuration. Am. Journ. of Phys. Anthrop., 5, 143, 1922.Google Scholar
Wilder, H. Palm and sole studies. Biol. Bulletin, 49, 182, 1925.Google Scholar
Wilder, H. Palm and sole studies. Biol. Bulletin, 50, 393, 1926.Google Scholar