Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T14:31:49.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Der Verwandtschaftsgrad der Bevölkerung kleiner ländlicher Gemeinden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

V. V. Bunak
V. V. Bunak*
Affiliation:
Institut für Ethnologie, Akademia Naúk, Moskvá (SSSR)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To determine the small population as a specific group, several quantitative indexes have to be taken into consideration. The author, making use of these indexes, differentiates three types of small populations: the isolate, the « dem » and the « large dem ». The central type — the dem — is a group including 1,500 to 4,000 individuals with an increase of more than 20-25 per cent in 25 years (one generation); a high proportion, about 80 per cent, of the marriages is concluded inside the group and an insignificant part of the members have descended from allogenous ancestors. The inhabitants of a rural locality constitute in most cases a « dem ». Theoretical calculations as well as genealogical studies have shown that the preponderant part of adult members of a « dem » appear to be related to each other in the eighth degree (according to Tab. 2 - cousins thrice removed).

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1965 , pp. 174 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1965

References

Bibliographie

Bounak, V.: La variabilité des caractères somatiques de petites populations et les problèmes de la taxonomie. VIIe Congrès des Sciences Anthropol. Ethnolog. Moscou, 1964.Google Scholar
Dodinval, P. & Klein, D.: Caractères démographiques et génétiques d'un petit village savoyard. Journal de Génétique Humaine, t. II, 1962.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, I. S.: The relationship of population density to residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection. Amer. Sociol. Review, 13, 1948.Google Scholar
Gessain, M.: Étude socio-démographique chez le Coniaqui et Bassati, Bulletins et Mémoires Société Anthropol. t. 5, 1963.Google Scholar
Keiter, T.: Das Vermischungstempo nachbarschaftsgebundener Bevölkerung. Rassenkunde, III, 1936.Google Scholar
Kherumian, : La structure de la population. Le cercle des mariages. Revue Anthropologique, 1959.Google Scholar
Modrewska, K.: Parish Melgiew as a biological centre of isolation. Ann. Univers. M. Curie-Sklodowska, Sect. B. III/5. Lublin, 1948.Google Scholar
Schwidetzky, I.: Grundzüge der Völkerbiologie. Stuttgart, 1950 Google Scholar
Spuhler, J. & Kluckhorn, C: Inbreeding coefficients of the Ramah Navho population. Human Biology, 25. 1953.Google Scholar
Sutter, J. & Goux, J.: L'aspect démographique des problèmes de l'isolat. Population, t. 16, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabah, L. & Sutter, J.: La mesure de la consanguinité. Population, t. 4, 1950.Google Scholar
Vincent, P.: Le rôle des familles nombreuses dans le renouvellement des générations. Population, t. I. 1946.Google Scholar