Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:05:42.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contributo allo Studio delle Basi Genetiche dell'Ulcera Duodenale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

L. Remelli ,
A. Serra  and
V. Gualandri
L. Remelli
Affiliation:
Clinica Chirurgica Generale, dell'Università di Ferrara (Italia Centro di Studi di Genetica Umana, dell'Università, di Milano (Italia)
A. Serra
Affiliation:
Clinica Chirurgica Generale, dell'Università di Ferrara (Italia Centro di Studi di Genetica Umana, dell'Università, di Milano (Italia)
V. Gualandri
Affiliation:
Clinica Chirurgica Generale, dell'Università di Ferrara (Italia Centro di Studi di Genetica Umana, dell'Università, di Milano (Italia)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Duodenal ulcer is a rather common disease, showing a clear family concentration. The aim of this work was to detect, in the etiology of this disease, possible genetic components, and to study their characteristics. The survey has been carried out by analyzing the data collected in 100 families, assembled by starting from a corresponding number of « index cases », and utilizing for comparison and also further analyzing the data by Doll and Buch (1950) and by Doll and Kelloch (1951). The " secondary cases " found, as a whole, were 109 (90 males and 19 females). The results may be summarized as follows:

1) the frequency of the disease in the sibships, independently from sex and corrected for age, is of 32.5% ± 2.5;

2) the frequency is, however, different in the two sexes. The estimate of this difference has been obtained calculating the relative risk (x) to contract the disease in the males, as compared to the females. Considering all the families together, such risk is x =5.8. However, x =16.7 in the 39 families with both healthy parents; x = 4.0 in the 45 families with the father affected; x = 2.9 in the families with the mother affected;

3) though the analysis of segregation ratios would not allow, by itself, definitely excluding the hypothesis of a monofactorial recessive inheritance, many reasons lead to think of a possible case of « simulated mendelism »;

4) the application of the methods of analysis proposed and worked out, in their theoretical basis, by Penrose (1953) and by Edwards (1960) for the genetic study of common diseases, makes much more probable the hypothesis that the genetic basis of duodenal ulcer is multifactorial. This does not exclude, however, that some particular environmental factors may increase the phenotypical correlation among the brothers — at least in the material under consideration.

Therefore, the hypothesis now allowing the best interpretation of the observations is that duodenal ulcer could be controlled by a number of additive genes with a weak effect.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1964 , pp. 369 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1964

References

Bibliografia

Bauer, J.: Is susceptibility to peptic ulcer inherited? Gastroenterology, 16, 791–793 (1950).Google Scholar
Doig, R. K.: Illness in twins: II. Duodenal ulcer. Med. J. Austr., 44, 617–619 (1957).Google Scholar
Doll, R. e Buch, J.: Hereditary factors in peptic ulcer. Ann. Eugen., 15, 135–146 (1950).Google Scholar
Doll, R., Kelloch, T. D.: The separate inheritance of gastric and duodenal ulcers. Ann. Eugen., 16, 231–240 (1951).Google Scholar
Edwards, J. H.: The simulation of mendelism. Acta Genet., 10, 63–70 (1960).Google Scholar
Edwards, J.H.: The genetic basis of common disease. Am. J. Med., 34, 627–638 (1963).Google Scholar
Freeman, R.: Peptic ulceration in identical twins. Brit. Med. J., 1, 765 (1947).Google Scholar
Gedda, L.: Studio dei gemelli. Orizzonte Medico, Roma 1951.Google Scholar
Grueneberg, H.: Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. IV-Quasi-continuous variations. J. Genet., 51 95 (1951).Google Scholar
Helweg-Larsen, H. F.: Familial occurrence of gastroduodenitis. Acta Med. Scand., 125, 63–69 (1946).Google Scholar
Levin, A. E. e Kuchur, B. A.: On the clinico-genetical differentiation of ulcerous diseases. Proc. Maxim Gorky Med.-Genet. Research Instit., 4, 181 (1936) Git. in DOLL R. e BUCH J.Google Scholar
Levrat, M., Larbre, F. e Richard, M.: Ulcer gastroduodénal à début juvenil avec hérédité ulcéreuse double dans les lignes paternelles et maternelles. Trois cas personnels. Arch. Mal. App. Digest., 43, 1001–1010 (1954).Google Scholar
Morton, N. E.: Segregation analysis in human genetics. Science, 127, 79–80, 1958.Google Scholar
Morton, N. E.: Genetic tests under incomplete ascertainment. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 11, 1–16, 1959.Google Scholar
Nicol, B. M.: The geographical distribution of gastric and duodenal ulcers in the British Isles. Brit. Med. J., 2, 780–782 (1941).Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S.: The genetical background of common diseases. Acta Genet., 4, 257–265 (1953).Google Scholar
Pilot, M. L., Lenkoski, L. D., Spiro, H. M. e SchÄFer, R.: Duodenal ulcer in one of identical twins. Psycosom. Med.; 3, 221–227 (1957).Google Scholar
Roberts, J. A. F.: Multifactorial inheritance and human disease. Progress in Medical Genetics, 3, 178–216 (1964).Google Scholar
Sällström, T.: On hereditary and familial conditions in gastric ulcers and duodenal ulcers. Acta Med. Scand., 121 57–67 (1945).Google Scholar
Smith, G. A. B.: A test for segregation ratios in family data. Ann. Hum. Genet., 20, 257–265 (1956).Google Scholar
Verschuer, O. Von: Genetik des Menschen. Urban und Schwarzenberg, München 1959.Google Scholar
Willcox, P. H.: Gastric disorders in the services. Brit. Med. J., 1, 1008–1012 (1940).Google Scholar
Wright, J. T., Grant, A. e Jennings, D.: A duodenal ulcer family. Lancet, 2, 1314–1318 (1955).Google Scholar