Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:57:58.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cesarean Delivery of the Second Twin After the Vaginal Birth of the First Twin: Misfortune or Mismanagement?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

I. Blickstein ,
Y. Zalel  and
A. Weissman
I. Blickstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot, (affiliated to the Hadassah-Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem), Israel
Y. Zalel
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot, (affiliated to the Hadassah-Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem), Israel
A. Weissman
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot, (affiliated to the Hadassah-Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem), Israel
*
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Hospital, 76100 Rehovot, Israel

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The perinatal characteristics of 16 vaginal-abdominal deliveries of twins were evaluated. The primary indication for the cesarean delivery was compound vertex presentation (n = 4), prolapsed umbilical cord (n = 4), transverse lie (n = 7), and mentoposterior face presentation (n= 1). Ther outcome of Twin A was not different from that of Twin B. About 90% of the twins were eventually discharged on time. A significant correlation (R = 0.9722, p < 0.0003) was found between the reported rates of combined deliveries and cesareans in twins. The data suggest that a higher rate of combined deliveries is expected in practices where abdominal deliveries are performed more often in twin gestations, while in obstetric services with low cesarean rates in twins, combined deliveries seem to be unfortunate occurrences dictated by unexpected intrapartum events.

Keywords

Cesarean deliveryPresentationTwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 40 , Issue 3-4 , October 1991 , pp. 389 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1991

References

REFERENCES

1. Baltzer, H (1968): Seltene Indikation zur Sectio beim 2. Zwilling Zbl. Gynaekol 90:92–95.Google Scholar
2. Blickstein, I Schwartz, Z, Lancet, M, Borenstein, R (1987): Vaginal delivery of the second twin in breech presentation. Obstet Gynecol 69:774–776.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Chervenak, FA, Johnson, RE, Berkowitz, RL, Grannum, P, Hobbins, JC (1984): Is routine cesarean section necessary for vertex-breech and vertex-transverse twin gestations? Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Constantine, G, Redman, CW (1987): Cesarean delivery of the second twin. Lancet i:618–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Editorial (1990): The second twin. Lancet ii:284.Google Scholar
6. Evrard, JR, Gold, EM (1981): Cesarean section for delivery of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 51:581–583.Google Scholar
7. Friedman, M, Atad, J, Peretz, BA, Paldi, E (1979): Cesarean section for the second twin. Inter Surg 64:57–58.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Gerber, JH, Choithani, H, O'Leary, JA (1969): Cesarean section for the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 33:770–771.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Guttmacher, AF (1967): Combined abdominal and vaginal delivery of twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 99:1020–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ho, KS, Wu, PYK (1975): Perinatal factors and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122:979–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Katz, Z, Shoham Schwartz, Z, Lancet, M, Blickstein, I, Mogilner, BM, Zalel, Y (1988): Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse: A 5-year study. Obstet Gynecol 72:278–281.Google Scholar
12. Leysen, B, Roodhooft, AM, Buytaert, P (1984): Cesarean section for the second twin. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 16:377–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Olofsson, P, Rydhström, H (1985): Twin delivery: How should the second twin be delivered? Am J Obstet Gynecol 152: 479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Rattan, PK, Knuppel, RA, O'Brien, WF, Scerbo, JC (1986): Cesarean delivery of the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:936–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Rayburn, WF, Lavin, JP, Miodovnik, M, Varner, MW (1984): Multiple gestation: Time interval between delivery of the first and second twins. Obstet Gynecol 63:502–506.Google ScholarPubMed
16. Samra, JS, Spillane, H, Mukoyoko, J, Tang, L, Obhrai, MS (1990): Cesarean section for the birth of the second twin. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:234–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Schnell, KH, Anton, W (1969): Seltene Indikation zur Sectio beim zweiten Zwilling. Zbl Gynaekol 91:158–159.Google Scholar
18. Seiler, JS (1990): The demise of vaginal operative obstetrics: A suggested plan for its revival. Obstet Gynecol 75:710–713.Google ScholarPubMed
19. Shoham Schwartz, Z, Blickstein, I, Zosmer, A, Katz, Z, Borenstein, R (1989): Transverse uterine incision for cesarean delivery of the transverse lying fetus. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 32:67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar