Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:36:38.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cancer in Twins: Concordance or Discordance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

L. Keith  and
E. Brown
L. Keith*
Affiliation:
Depts. of Microbiology and of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago Medical School, Chicago, Ill.
E. Brown
Affiliation:
Depts. of Microbiology and of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago Medical School, Chicago, Ill.
*
The Chicago Medical School, 2020 West Ogden Avenue, Chicago, Ill. 60612, USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although published reports of cancer in twins are not numerous, there are case reports of concordance in a variety of tumors in twins. Cancer of the breast is most frequent; concordance has also been noted in uterus, gonads, eyes, stomach and rectum. In general, these reports tend to support the theory that genetic factors operate either in the concordance of cancer or in the site of the specific tumors. The significance of concordance remains in doubt, however. Reported study groups are not comparable because the materials and methods are disparate. In many reviews the methods of zygosity determination are questionable. The fact that not all cases of cancer in twins are reported introduces a constant source of bias. The following review illustrates this well.

In 1940, Madge T. Macklin reviewed the publications of tumors in MZ and DZ twins and concluded that tumors affected MZ twins far more than both members of a DZ pair. She observed concordance in tumor type, site, and age of onset, as more frequent in MZ than DZ twins. She later (1947) reexamined the same material and some additional twin pairs and concluded that MZ twins have identical tumors far more frequently than DZ twins. She emphasized that rare types of tumors were genetically determined.

In 1948, Busk et al reported on a series of 185 twin study pairs from the Danish Cancer Registry; they concluded that (1) there was a tendency toward a higher incidence of cancer in partners of MZ than of DZ cancerous twins; (2) these deviations from expected values were not considered statistically significant; and (3) there was a tendency for tumors in MZ twins to affect corresponding organs in both partners, this being not the case in DZ twins.

Type
Session 5 - Twin Studies and Cancer
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 19 , Issue 1-2 , April 1970 , pp. 61 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1970

References

Busk, T., Clemmensen, J., Nielsen, A. (1948). Twin studies and other genetical investigations in the Danish Cancer Registry. Brit. J. Cancer, 2: 156.Google Scholar
Gedda, L., Milani-Comparetti, M. (1966). Computerization of a permanent twin register; a basic tool in twin research. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 4: 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvald, B., Hauge, M. (1956). A catamnestic investigation of Danish twins: preliminary report. Danish Med. Bull., 3: 150.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvald, B., Hauge, M. (1958). Catamnestic investigation of Danish twins; survey of 1300 pairs. Acta Genet. (Basel), 8: 287.Google Scholar
Harvald, B., Hauge, M. (1963). Heredity of cancer elucidated by a study of unselected twins. J.A.M.A., 186: 749.Google Scholar
Hauge, M., Harvald, B. (1961). Malignant growths in twins. Acta Genet. (Basel), 11: 372.Google Scholar
Jarvik, L. F., Falek, A. (1962). Comparative data on cancer in ageing twins. Cancer, 15: 1009.Google Scholar
Macklin, M. (1940). An analysis of tumors in monozygous and dizygous twins. J. Hered., 31: 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macklin, M. (1947). Inheritance and human cancer. Ohio Med. J., 43: 836.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A., Clemmensen, J. (1951). Twin studies in the Danish Cancer Registry. 1942-1955. Brit. J. Cancer, 11: 327.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. H., Degeorge, F. V. (1964). Neoplastic diseases in twins: evidence for pre- or perinatal factors; conditioning cancer susceptibility. Cancer, 17: 1149.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spranger, J., Verschuer, O. V. (1964). Untersuchungen zur Frage der Erblichkeit des Krebs. Z. Menschl. Vererb. Konstitionsl., 37: 549.Google Scholar
Verschuer, O. V. (1956 a). Tuberkulose und Krebs bei Zwillingen. Acta Genet. (Basel), 6: 103.Google Scholar
Verschuer, O. V. (1956 b) Cancer in twins. German. Med. Monthly, 1: 302.Google Scholar
Verschuer, O. V., Kober, E. (1940). Die Frage der erblichen Disposition zum Krebs. Z. Krebsforsch., 50: 5.Google Scholar