Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:34:55.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioral Patterns in Full-Term and Preterm Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Marilyn L. Riese
Marilyn L. Riese*
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Kentucky
*
Child Development Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Health Sciences Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Scores from a behavioral assessment of 160 stable preterm newborn twins were compared with those obtained from 120 full-term newborn twins. The twins were examined during various activities to obtain representative samples of behavior in the following behavioral categories: irritability, resistance to soothing, reactivity, reinforcement value, and activity level. Within-pair correlations were found in all of the behavioral categories, suggesting a constitutional influence on behavioral patterns during the neonatal period. The preterm infants demonstrated internal consistency of behavior similar to that of the full-term group in the first three categories. However, group differences were found when comparing the preterm with the full-term infants on actual ratings of the items. Behavioral differences between these full-term and preterm twins were comparable to those published for samples of singleton infants.

Keywords

Newborn twinsNeonatal behaviorPreterm behaviorTwin concordanceTwin assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 32 , Issue 3-4 , July 1983 , pp. 209 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1983

References

REFERENCES

1. Bims, B (1965): Individual differences in human neonates' responses to stimulation. Child Dev 36:249–256.Google Scholar
2. Brazelton, TB (1973): “Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale.” Clinics in Developmental Medicine, No. 50. London: William Heinemann Medical Books.Google Scholar
3. Caputo, DV, Goldstein, KM, Taub, HB (1979): The development of prematurely born children through middle childhood. In Field, TM, Sostek, AM, Goldberg, S, Shuman, HH (eds): “Infants Born at Risk: Behavior and Development.” New York: Spectrum Publications, Inc. Google Scholar
4. Caputo, DV, Mandell, W (1970): Consequences of low birth weight. Dev Psychol 3:363–383.Google Scholar
5. Cronbach, LJ (1970): “Essentials of Psychological Testing, 3rd Ed.” New York: Harper & Row, pp 155–162.Google Scholar
6. Dargassies, SS (1977): Long-term neurological follow-up study of 286 truly premature infants. I: Neurological sequelae. Dev Med Child Neurol 19:462–478.Google Scholar
7. DiVitto, B, Goldberg, S (1979): The effects of newborn medical status on early parent-infant interaction. In Field, TM, Sostek, AM, Goldberg, S, Shuman, HH (eds): “Infants Bom at Risk: Behavior and Development.” New York: Spectrum Publications, Inc. Google Scholar
8. Dreyfus-Brisac, C (1970): Ontogenesis of sleep in human prematures after 32 weeks of conceptional age. Dev Psychobiol 3:91–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Epstein, S (1980): The stability of behavior. II: Implications for psychological research. Am Psychol 35:790–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Falkner, F (1978): Implications for growth in human twins. In Falkner, F, Tanner, JM (eds): “Human Growth, Vol I.” New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
11. Field, TM (1979): Interaction patterns of preterm and term infants. In Field, TM, Sostek, AM, Goldberg, S, Shuman, HH (eds): “Infants Bom at Risk: Behavior and Development.” New York: Spectrum Publications, Inc. Google Scholar
12. Gil, D (1970): “Violence Against Children.” Cambridge, MA: Howard University.Google Scholar
13. Graham, FK, Matarazzo, RG, Caldwell, BM (1956): Behavioral differences between normal and traumatized newborns: II. Standardization, reliability, and validity. Psychol Mono Gen Appl 70 (21).17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kurtzberg, D, Vaughan, HG Jr, Daum, C, Grellong, BA, Albin, S, Rotkin, L (1979): Neurobehavioral performance of low-birthweight infants at 40 weeks conceptional age: Comparison with normal full-term infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 21:590–607.Google Scholar
15. Lancioni, GE, Horowitz, FD, Sullivan, JW (1980): The NBAS-K: I. A study of its stability and structure over the first month of life. Infant Behav Dev 3:341–359.Google Scholar
16. Lester, BM, Zeskin, PS (1979): The organization and assessment of crying in the infant at risk. In Field, TM, Sostek, AM, Goldberg, S, Shuman, HH (eds): “Infants Born at Risk: Behavior and Development.” New York: Spectrum Publications, Inc. Google Scholar
17. Lubchenco, LO (1976): “The High Risk Infant.” Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co. Google Scholar
18. Martin, HP (1976): Which children get abused: High risk factors in the child. In Martin, HP, Kenipe, CH (eds): “The Abused Child: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Developmental Issues and Treatment.” Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co. Google Scholar
19. Michaelis, R, Parmelee, AH, Stern, E, Haber, A (1973): Activity states in premature and term infants. Dev Psychobiol 6:209–215.Google Scholar
20. Osofsky, JD (1976): Neonatal characteristics and mother-infant interaction in two observational situations. Child Dev 47:1138–1147.Google Scholar
21. Riese, ML (1982): Procedures and norms for assessing behavioral patterns in full-term and stable preterm neonates. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychol 12:6 (Ms. No. 2415).Google Scholar
22. Riese, ML (1983): Assessment of behavioral patterns in neonates. Infant Behav Dev 6:(in press).Google Scholar
23. St. Clair, KL (1978): Neonatal assessment procedures: A historical review. Child Dev 49:280–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Self, PA, Horowitz, FD (1979): The behavioral assessment of the neonate: An overview. In Osofsky, JD (ed): “Handbook of Infant Development.” New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
25. Sostek, AM, Quinn, PO, Davitt, MK (1979): Behavior, development and neurologic status of premature and full-term infants with varying medical complications. In Field, TM, Sostek, AM, Goldberg, S, Shuman, HH (eds): “Infants Born At Risk: Behavior and Development.” New York: Spectrum Publications, Inc. Google Scholar
26. Thomas, A, Chess, S, Birch, HG, Hertzig, ME, Korn, S (1963): “Behavioral Individuality in Early Childhood.” New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
27. Wilson, RS (1979): Analysis of longitudinal twin data. Acta Genet Med Germellol 28:93–105.Google Scholar
28. Zeskind, PS, Lester, BM (1978): Acoustic features and auditory perceptions of the cries of newborns with prenatal and perinatal complications. Child Dev 49:580–589.Google Scholar