Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:56:56.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bed Rest in Twin Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

B. Kappel ,
K.B. Hansen ,
J. Moller  and
J. Faaborg-Andersen
B. Kappel*
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus Kommunehospital, Denmark
K.B. Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus Kommunehospital, Denmark
J. Moller
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus Kommunehospital, Denmark
J. Faaborg-Andersen
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus Kommunehospital, Denmark
*
Age Bergsvej 33 B, DK-8240 Risskov, Denmark

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of 146 twin pregnancies were studied to evaluate the importance of bed rest. A significantly reduced frequency of preterm delivery was found after bed rest in hospital as compared to bed rest at home or no bed rest at all. An increase in gestational age and in birth weight was seen after bed rest. No effect was found on the intrauterine increase of fetal weight per time. Early routine ultrasound is recommended, so that effective bed rest may be instituted in due time.

Keywords

Twin pregnancyBed restBirthweightPreterm deliverySmall for datesPerinatal mortality
Type
Review Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 34 , Issue 1-2 , April 1985 , pp. 67 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1985

References

REFERENCES

1. Dunn, B (1961): Bed rest in twin pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonx 68:685–687.Google Scholar
2. Grennert, L (1979): Ultraljud screening öch övervakning af graviditeter med specielt hänsyn til tvillinger. (Disp.) Malmö.Google Scholar
3. Hansen, EJ (1968): De 14-20 áriges uddannelsessituation 1965. Socialforskningsinstituttet, Kobenhavn.Google Scholar
4. Hirst, JC (1939): Maternal and fetal expectations with multiple pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 37:634.Google Scholar
5. Jeffrey, RL, Bowes, WA, Delaney, JJ (1974): Role of bed rest in twin gestation. Obstet Gynecol 43:822–826.Google Scholar
6. Jouppila, P, Kauppila, A, Koivisto, M, Moilanen, I, Ylikoikala, O (1975): Twin pregnancy. The role of active management during pregnancy and delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 44: 13–19.Google Scholar
7. Koivisto, M, Jouppila, P, Kauppila, A, Moilanen, I, Ylikoikala, O (1975): Twin pregnancy. Neonatal morbidity and mortality. Acta Obstet Gunecol Scand Suppl 44:21–29.Google Scholar
8. Lauersen, B (1973): Twin pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 52:367–371.Google Scholar
9. Morris, N, Osborn, OB, Wright, HP (1955): Effective circulation of the uterine wall in late pregnancy measured with NaCl. Lancet 1:323–325.Google Scholar
10. O'Connor, MC (1979): Double blind trial of ritodrine and placebo in twin pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 86'706–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. O'Connor, MC, Arias, E, Royston, JP, Dalrymple, IJ (1981): The merits of special outnatal care for twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 88:222–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Persson, PH, Grennert, L (1979): Diagnosis and treatment of twin pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:311–317.Google Scholar
13. Persson, PH, Grennert, L (1979): Towards a normalization of the outcome of twin pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:341–346.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Powers, WF (1973): Twin pregnancy: Complications and treatment. Obstet Gynecol 42:795–808.Google Scholar
15. Pulkkinen, MO, Grönroos, M (1979): Bed rest did not prevent prematurity in Twins because the etiology lies in the stretch and poor progesterogenesis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 58:569–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Weekes, ARL, Menyies, DN, Boer, CHD (1977): The relative efficacy of bed rest, cervical suture, and no treatment in the management of twin pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84:161–164.Google Scholar