Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T03:54:46.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Experimental Study of Mutual Behaviour Imitation and Person Perception in MZ and DZ Twins — Implications for an experimental-psychometric analysis of heritability coefficients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

G.J.S. Wilde
G.J.S. Wilde*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
*
Dept. of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In an earlier study (Wilde, 1964) on 88 MZ and 42 DZ twin pairs in Holland, DZ pairs, who had been separated for a minimum of five years, were compared with DZ twins living together on measures of neuroticism, extraversion, test-taking attitude and masculinity/femininity. The striking observation was made that separated DZ twins were systematically more similar than DZ twins living together across all personality traits concerned. No such difference was found between MZ pairs living together and MZ pairs living separately. In order to account for these findings, the hypothesis was put forward that the persons in the direct environment of a twin pair have certain behavioural expectancies with regard to the twin members, which depend upon the observation whether the twins are MZ or DZ. As soon as the twin pairs leave the parental home these behavioural expectancies come to a halt and the “true personalities” of the twins will emerge. This might explain why DZ pairs were found to be more similar after separation, and this reasoning also shows that it is inadequate to say that “the environment is the same” or “the environment is different”, without specifying which environmental variable is the same and which one is not. In some respects the environments of separated DZ pairs may have been more similar than the environments of DZ pairs living together.

Type
Session 16 - Twins Studies in Psychology
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 19 , Issue 1-2 , April 1970 , pp. 273 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1970

References

Brody, D. (1937). Twin resemblances in mechanical ability, with reference to the effects of practice on performance. Child Develop., 8: 207–216.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Eysenck, S. B. (1963). Eysenck Personality Inventory. Form A. Educ. and Industr. Testing Service, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar
Jones, H. E. (1955). Perceived differences among twins. Eugen. Quart., 2: 98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNemar, Q. (1933). Twin resemblances in motor skills and the effect of practice thereon. J. Genet. Psychol., 42: 70–79.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1961). Nationality and conformity, Sci. Amer., 205: 45–51.Google Scholar
Pire, G. (1966). Application des techniques sociométriques à l'étude des jumeaux. Enfance, 1: 23–48.Google Scholar
Shields, J. (1954). Personality differences and neurotic traits in normal twin school children. Eugen. Rev., 45: 213–245.Google Scholar
Smith, R. T. (1965). A comparison of socioenvironmental factors in monozygotic and dizygotic twins, testing an assumption. In Vandenberg, S. G.: Goals and Methods in Behavior Genetics. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wilde, G. J. S. (1964). Inheritance of personality traits: an investigation into the hereditary determination of neurotic instability, extraversion, and other personality traits by means of a questionnaire administered to twins. Acta Psychol. (Amst), 22: 37–51.Google Scholar
Zazzo, R. (1960). Les Jumeaux, le Couple et la Personne. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar