Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:15:24.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adaptation to Maximal Effort: Genetics vs. Environment. A Case History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

R.E. DeMeersman ,
D.C. Schaefer ,
W.W. Miller  and
W.E. Nance
R.E. DeMeersman*
Affiliation:
Human Performance Laboratory, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
D.C. Schaefer
Affiliation:
Human Performance Laboratory, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
W.W. Miller
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond
W.E. Nance
Affiliation:
Human Genetics, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond
*
Director, Human Performance Laboratory, 817 West Franklin Street, Rm. 319 Richmond, Virginia 23284, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An individual's functional ability in physiological responsiveness is thought to be an interaction between his heredity and his environment. This hypothesis was tested to determine if different extragenetic influences would alter functional adaptability in a set of MZ triplets. After a 3-month aerobic physical fitness training program varying only in frequency, measured values for the triplets' maximum oxygen consumption (MaxVo2 ) were 59.1, 44.5, and 57.8 ml/min/kg, as compared to pretreatment values of 45.2,45.1, and 49.1 ml/min/kg respectively. These results clearly indicate intrapair differences in functional adaptability, stemming from difference in the training frequency program. The split-triplet design of this study indicates that environmental factors contribute substantially to the intrapair variance found among MZ siblings. Data extrapolation suggests that environmental stimulation of sufficient magnitude is likely to alter the functional adaptability in the individual set by his genotype.

Keywords

Monozygotic tripletsEnvironmentTrainingOxygen consumptionAdaptation
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , October 1984 , pp. 565 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984

References

REFERENCES

1. Dencker, SJ. Hauge, M, Kay, L, Nielsen, A (1961): The use of anthropological traits and blood groups in the determination of the zygosity of twins. Acta Genet 11:265–285.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Ekblom, B (1969): Effect of physical training on oxygen transport system in man. Acta Physiol Scand (Supp) 328.Google Scholar
3. Juel-Nielsen, N, Nielsen, A, Hauge, M (1950): On the diagnosis of zygosity in twins and the value of blood groups. Acta Genet 8:256–273.Google Scholar
4. Klissouras, V (1971): Hereditability of adaptive variation. J Appi Physiol 31:338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Klissouras, V, Pirnay, F, Petit, JM (1973): Adaptation to maximal effort: genetics and age. J Appl Physiol 32:288–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Nichols, RC, Bilbro, WC Jr, (1966): The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet 16:265–275.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Salint, B, Blomquist, J, Mitchell, R, Johnson, L, Widdenthal, K, Chapman, G (1968): Response to exercise after bed rest and after training. Circulation 37, (Suppl) 7.Google Scholar
8. Schoenfeldt, LF (1969): Comparison of two analytic procedures for estimating twin zygosity. Hum Hered 19:343–353.10.1159/000152237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Wasserman, K, Whipp, B, Koyal, S, Beaver, W (1973): Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J Appl Physiol 35:236–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed