Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:24:28.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Remarks On The Term “Aztec Empire”*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

R. H. Barlow*
Affiliation:
University of California (Berkeley)

Extract

The enormous native state which Cortés overthrew August 13, 1521, is commonly called the Aztec Empire. This is true more of the English literature than of the Spanish, which sometimes prefers the half-correct “Imperio de los Mexicanos”. The writer has no quarrel with the word “Empire”, which has been questioned from time to time, but he does have with the word “Aztec” used in this connection. This originates, apparently, with Clavijero and was diffused by Prescott, a mere hundred years ago. The latter speaks initially of “the ancient Mexicans, or Aztecs as they were called” and after that uses “Aztec Empire” incessantly. This nomenclature, vulgarized through such dross as Bancroft, has swamped everything else. Nevertheless, neither Cortés nor Bernal Díaz nor Tápia, all actors in the Conquest, ever so much as mention the word “Aztec”, much less say “we conquered the Aztec Empire”. Nor does Sahagun in his encyclopedic work use the term “Aztec Empire”, nor does Motolinía. If it appears in any of these works, or anywhere among the first generation of conquerors and settlers, it is so subordinately mentioned that it has escaped the writer. Below we shall see what its conquerors did call the Empire they overthrew.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study has been developed from a paper read in Xalapa, Ver. before the 6th Congreso Mexicano de Ia Historia, in September, 1943.

References

Codex, Aubin1902. Colección de documentos para la historia mexicana, cuartocuaderno. (Penafiel edition). México.Google Scholar
Cortés, Hernán1866. Cartas y relaciones. (Gayangos edition). Madrid.Google Scholar
Díaz del Castillo, Bernal1904. Historia verdadera. (Genaro García edition). 2 volumes. México.Google Scholar
García, Icazbalceta (editor)—1891. Historia de los mexicanos por sus pinturas. Nueva colección de documentos inéditos. 3:228262. México.Google Scholar
Ixtlilxochitl, Fernando de Alba—1891–92. Obras históricas. (Tomo I: Historia chichimeca. Tomo II: Relaciones). México.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Walther (editor)—1938. Die Geschichte der Königreiche von Mexiko und Colhuacan. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
“Motolinía”, Fr.Toribio de, (O.F.M.)—1903: Memoriales. (García Pimentel edition). Mexico.Google Scholar
Papeles de Nueva, España, segunda serie. Editados por Francisco del Paso y Troncóse 1902–1907. México.Google Scholar
Fr.Torquemada, Juan de (O.F.M.)—1723. Los veinte i vn libros rituales i monarchia indiana. 3 volumes. Madrid.Google Scholar