No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Nationalism and Class Conflict in Mexico, 1910-1920*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2015
Extract
During the Mexican Revolution, nationalism and class conflict became two of the most pervasive aspects of the social upheaval that swept Mexico. Class conflict became so intense that workers did not respond to the bourgeois leader Francisco Madero after he assumed power in 1911. Emiliano Zapata and Francisco Villa also failed to attract urban workers or unite the nation. Venustiano Carranza eventually articulated a version of nationalism that responded to class conflict by promising to alleviate the grim features of Mexican society that required reform. In Mexico as well as many other countries after the nineteenth century, nationalism prevailed over class conflict during periods of crisis.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1987
Footnotes
*
An abbreviated version of this study was presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Social Science Association in Fort Worth on March 22, 1984. The author would like to thank Linda Hall and Henry C. Schmidt for their comments. Travel grants from the University of Texas at Arlington Organized Research Fund financed the research for much of this study.
References
1 General studies of Marxist ideology are Feuer, Lewis S., ed. Marx and Engels: Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy, (Garden City, N.Y., 1959)Google Scholar; Fromm, Erich, Marx’s Concept of Man, (New York, 1966)Google Scholar; Mills, C.Wright, The Marists, (London, 1963).Google Scholar
2 On this point, see Hobsbawm, E.J., “Class consciousness in History,” in Mészaros, Ivan, ed. Aspects of History and Class Consciousness. (London, 1971), 5–8 Google Scholar; Wolf, Eric R. and Hansen, Edward C., The Human Condition in Latin America, (New York, 1972).Google Scholar Basic concepts concerning political economy are developed in Henrique Cardoso, Fernando, Dependency and Development in Latin America, (Berkeley, 1979).Google Scholar
3 Smith, Anthony D. S., Nationalism in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1979)Google Scholar; Davis, Horace B., Marxist and Labor Theories of Nationalism to 1917, (New York, 1967)Google Scholar; Ramos, Samuel, Profile of Man and Culture in Mexico, (Austin, 1975)Google Scholar; Schmidt, Henry C., The Roots of Lo Mexicano: Self and Society in Mexican Thought, 1900–1934, (College Station, 1978).Google Scholar
4 Richmond, Douglas W., Venusliano Carranza’s Nationalist Struggle, 1893–1920, (Lincoln, 1983).Google Scholar
5 Ruth Clark, Marjorie, Organized Labor in Mexico, (Chapel Hill, 1967), p. 1.Google Scholar
6 For a comprehensive study of the Porfiriato, see Villegas, Daniel Cosío, ed. Historia moderna de México, 9 vols. (Mexico City, 1955–72).Google Scholar
7 Ashby, Joe C., Organized Labor and the Mexican Revolution Under Lázaro Cárdenas, (Chapel Hill, 1967), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar For a broad overview of early working class activism, see Araiza, Luis, Historia del movimiento obrero mexicano, 5 vols. (Mexico City, 1965), 2.Google Scholar
8 Aparicio, Alfonso López, El movimiento obrero en México, 2d ed. (Mexico City, 1968), pp. 106–7.Google Scholar
9 Ashby, , Organized Labor and the Mexican Revolution, p. 4.Google Scholar
10 Aparicio, López, El movimiento obrero en México, pp. 108–18.Google Scholar
11 Ibid., pp. 107–8.
12 Walker, David, “Porfirian Labor Politics: Working Class Organizations in Mexico City and Porfirio Díaz, 1876–1902,” The Americas, 37:3 (Jan. 1981), 157–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Hart, John M., Anarchism and the Mexican Working Class, (Austin, 1978), pp. 1–82.Google Scholar A good overview is Woodcock, George, Anarchism, (London, 1963).Google Scholar
14 For studies of Flores Magón, see Cumberland, Charles C., “Precursors of the Mexican Revolution of 1910,” Hispanic American Historical Review, 22 (May, 1942), 352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gómez-Quiñones, Juan, Sembradores — Ricardo Flores Magón y el Partido Liberal Mexicano — A Eulogy and Critique, Los Angeles, 1973)Google Scholar; Cockcroft, James, Intellectual Precursors of the Mexican Revolution, (Austin, 1968).Google Scholar Also, see Masters, Anthony, Bakunin: The Father of Anarchism, (New York, 1974).Google Scholar
15 Salazar, Rosendo and Escobedo, José G., Las pugnas de la gleba, 2 vols. (Mexico City, 1923), 1, pp. 14–17.Google Scholar Also, see González Navarro, Moisés, Las huelgas textiles en el porfiriato. (Puebla, 1970).Google Scholar
16 Salazar, and Escobedo, , Las pugnas de la gleba, 1, p. 18 Google Scholar; Cockcroft, , Intellectual Precursors, pp. 44–6.Google Scholar
17 Anderson, Rodney D., Outcasts in Their Own Land, (deKalb, 1976)Google Scholar presents the workers as voicing a traditional liberal ideology.
18 Aquirre, Manuel J., Cananea, (México, 1958)Google Scholar; Araiza, , Historia del movimiento obrero, 2, pp. 42–75 Google Scholar; Salazar, and Escobedo, , Las pugnas de la gleba, 1, pp. 23–6.Google Scholar
19 Clark, , Organized Labor in Mexico, p. 20 Google Scholar; Ashby, , Organized Labor and the Mexican Revolution, p. 8 Google Scholar
20 Blaisdell, Lowell L., The Desert Revolution, (Madison, 1962)Google Scholar; Hart, , Anarchism and the Mexican Working Class, pp. 101–7.Google Scholar
21 Aparicio, López, El movimiento obrero en México, p. 118.Google Scholar
22 Ashby, , Organized Labor and the Mexican Revolution, p. 5.Google Scholar
23 Ibid.,p. 9; LaFrance, David G., “Labour and the Mexican Revolution: President Francisco I. Madero and the Puebla Textile Workers,” Boletín de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe, 34 (June, 1983), 59–74.Google Scholar
24 Salazar, Rosendo, La Casa del Obrero Mundial, (Mexico City, 1962), pp. 50–1.Google Scholar See also Ruiz, Ramón E., “Madero’s Administration and Mexican Labor,” in Wilkie, James, Meyer, Michael C., and de Wilkie, Edna Monzón, eds. Contemporary Mexico, (Los Angeles and Berkeley, 1976), pp. 187–203.Google Scholar
25 This dispute is explained in Archivo General del Estado de Coahuila, Saltillo, Mexico (hereafter cited as AGEC), legajo 304, tomo 1, expediente 11,212.
26 Outlined in AGEC, leg. 293, expediente 11,148 and Subsecretaría de Gobernación to Carranza, July 26, 1911, AGEC, legajo 293, expedients 11,154.
27 Beezley, William H., “Governor Carranza and the Revolution in Coahuila,” The Americas, 33 (Oct. 1976), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Salazar, and Escobedo, , Las pugnas de la gleba, 1, pp. 8–9 Google Scholar; Silva Herzog, Jesús, Breve historia de la Revolución Mexicana, 2 vols. (Mexico City, 1966), 1, pp. 33–4.Google Scholar
29 Meyer, Jean, “Los obreros en la Revolución Mexicana: ‘Los batallones rojos’,” Historia Mexicana, 21 (July-Sept. 1971), 3,Google Scholar 6; Bookchin, Murray, The Spanish Anarchists: The Heroic Years, 1868–1936 (New York, 1977), 1–143Google Scholar; Brenan, Gerald, The Spanish Labyrinth: An Account of the Social and Political Background of the Civil War, (Cambridge, 1960).Google Scholar
30 Salazar, and Escobedo, , Las pugnas de la gleba, 1. p. 78 Google Scholar; Hart, John M., “The Urban Working Class and the Mexican Revolution: The Case of the Casa del Obrero Mundial,” Hispanic American Historical Review, 58 (Feb. 1978), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Salazar, and Escobedo, , Las pugnas de la gleba, 1, pp. 41–2Google Scholar; Salazar, , La Casa del Obrero Mundial, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
32 A tangible document is “La Casa del Obrero Mundial,” undated memo in Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico City, Ramo de la Revolución (hereafter cited as AGN ), legajo política interior.
33 For an excellent study of the early Spanish working class movement and Ferrer’s ideas, see Ullman’s, Joan Connelly The Tragic Week, (Cambridge, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Educational theories are revealed in Archivo Histórico Diplomático Mexicano de la Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores, Mexico City (hereafter cited as AREM), legajo 794, folleto 88-R-31, pp. 14, 129–132.
35 Ashby, , Organized Labor and the Mexican Revolution, p. 9 Google Scholar; Salazar, and Escobedo, ,.MDBO/ Las pugnas de la gleba, 1, 42–7.Google Scholar
36 An excellent source for economic change is Rosado, Diego López G., Historia y pensamiento económico de México, 5 vols. (Mexico City, 1968–72), 3, pp. 349–368.Google Scholar
37 Navarro, Moisés González, México: el capitalismo nacionalista, (Mexico City, 1970), pp. 197–8.Google Scholar
38 Valdés, Maximino, Impresiones de México por el Conde de Fox, (Mexico City, 1918), pp. 401–2Google Scholar; Richmond, Douglas W., “Confrontation and Reconciliation: Mexicans and Spaniards during the Mexican Revolution, 1910–1920,” The Americas, 41:2 (Oct. 1984), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 Huerta decree of March 27, 1914, AREM, leg. 1579, expediente de Victoriano Huerta; Confidential agent S. Ζ. Nieto to Venustiano Carranza, Sept. 27, 1915, Centro de Estudios de Historia de México, Mexico City, Manuscritos de don Venustiano Carranza (hereafter cited as AC); Agent Equis to foreign relations ministry, Dec. 19, 1916), AREM, Leg. 725, expediente 61-R-3, p. 439.
40 The best research on anti-Chinese activities is Cumberland, Charles C., “The Sonora Chinese and the Mexican Revolution,” Hispanic American Historical Review, 40 (May, 1960), 191–211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a discussion of the vice question and other aspects of the Chinese, see Richmond, Douglas W., “Factional Political Strife in Coahuila, 1910–1920,” Hispanic American Historical Review, 60 Feb. 1980), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Wang Dan Woo to Carranza, Oct. 22, 1915, AC.
41 F. Yang to Carranza, Feb. 18, 1915, AC; Chinese colony to governor Ramon Iturbe and Carranza, April 19, 1915, AC.
42 Navarro, González, Mexico: el capitalismo nacionalista, pp. 204–6.Google Scholar For Carranza’s rise to power, see Richmond, , Venustiano Carranza’s Nationalist Struggle, pp. 1–82.Google Scholar
43 Memo of June 14, 1915, AC. Justo Aceredo to Carranza, Nov. 4, 1919, AC and A. Arévalo to Carranza, June 5, 1919, AC.
44 Mexican consul in San Antonio to Carranza, July 9, 1919, AC; Federico Guillermo Voos to Carranza, July 21, 1919, AC.
45 Luis Roever to Carranza, Aug. 28, 1916, AC.
46 Carranza to Heriberto Barrón, April 29, 1916, AC. A thorough study of German aims in Mexico is Katz, Friedrich, The Secret War in Mexico: Europe, the United States and the Mexican Revolution, (Chicago, 1981).Google Scholar
47 Cumberland, Charles C., Mexico: The Struggle for Modernity, (New York, 1968), pp. 245–246;Google Scholar Samora, Julian, Los Mojados: The Wetback Story, (Notre Dame, 1971), p. 36.Google Scholar Carranza’s command that implemented the ley de 25 de enero de 1862 is in Carranza to governor Ignacio Pesqueira, May 17, 1913, Centro de Estudios de Historia de México City, Telegramas de Venustiano Carranza (hereafter cited as TVC), Coahuila, Carpeta 1. Random violence is reported in Tuxtepec Resident to Carranza, Feb. 26, 1915, AC and Edward A. Folsom to Pan American News Service, Jan. 27, 1915, AREM, Leg. 836, Fol. 110-R-6, telegrams 83 and 84.
48 Salazar, Rosendo, La Casa del Obrero Mundial, (Mexico City, 1962), p. 181.Google Scholar
49 The outlook of a food seller representative is in J. Zamora to Carranza, Aug. 11, 1919, AC. Also, see Nava to Jesús Acuna, Oct. 23, 1915. AREM. leg. 794, fol. 88-R-31, p. 106.
50 Nava to Carranza, Sept. 24, 1916, AC. Other reports of starvation are in Programa de Historia Oral, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (hereafter cited as PHO), interview no. 1/8, p. 68. 508 Rio Blanco factory workers to Carranza, May 5, 1915, AC; Margaricio Nava to Carranza, May 24, 1916. AC.
51 Various federal district signatories to Carranza, Aug. 25, 1914, AC; Cd. González resident to Carranza, June 16, 1916, AC.
52 Fifteen telegraph workers to Carranza, Sept. 29, 1916, AC. Secretary General of Unión de Empleados y Obreros de la Cia. de Travias de México to Carranza, June 16, 1916, AC.
53 On April 11, 1916 governor Simón Diaz told Carranza that he could not obtain “even a grain” of bread from the states of Colima, Oaxaca, or Chiapas because of uncooperative authorities in AC, letter of that date.
54 Gonzalo Sánchez to Carranza, Oct. 18, 1916, AC.
55 Tuxpan port workers to Carranza, Aug. 23, 1919, AC.
56 Cumberland, Charles C., Mexican Revolution: The Constitutionalist Years, (Austin, 1972), pp. 397–398.Google Scholar
57 González Roa, Fernando, El aspecto agrario de la Revolución Mexicana, (México, 1919), pp. 169–170,Google Scholar 175.
58 Beals, Carleton, Mexico: An Interpretation, (New York, 1923), pp. 115–116.Google Scholar
59 Twenty-nine Tepic citizens to Carranza, Feb. 15, 1916, AC.
60 10 San Marcos villagers to Carranza, Aug. 25, 1915, AC. For a detailed chronology of this dispute, see Secretaria de Reforma Agraria, Mexico City, Archivo del Ley de Seis de Enero de 1915,
61 J. Cruz Ramírez to Carranza, Feb. 25, 1916, AC.
62 José Soberanes to Carranza, Oct. 11, 1916, AC.
63 Municipality of Lafragua, Puebla to Carranza, Oct. 22, 1915, AC; village of San Miguel de Emén-guara, Guanajuato to Carranza, Nov. 13, 1915, AC; Merchant from Soto La Marina, Guanajuato to Carranza, May 12, 1916, AC.
64 Thompson, Wallace, Trading with Mexico, (New York, 1931), p. 209.Google Scholar
65 Dean of Artistas Dramáticas to Carranza, May 4, 1916, AC.
66 Mexico City writer to Carranza, Oct. 24, 1916, AC.
67 Agencia Confidential report to Caranza, Oct. 19, 1915, AC.
68 Puebla resident to Carranza, Feb. 8, 1915, AC; Carlos Ramírez to Carranza, May 17, 1915, AC.
69 A very extensive spy apparatus proposed by security officials is outlined in J. Nava to Carranza, March 16, 1915, AC. Typical denouncements are 7 federal district employees to Carranza, March 10, 1916, AC and G. Narváez to Carranza, April 20, 1915, AC. Similar undercurrents are in Veracruz supporter to Carranza, April 16, 1915, AC; Valentín Pérez to Carranza, Nov. 11, 1915, AC.
70 Yxtaltepec, Oaxaca informant to Carranza, Feb. 28, 1915, AC. Carranza endorsed this list with the notation, “READ.”
71 J. G. Nava to Carranza, dec. 9, 1915, AC.
72 Ramón Frausto to Carranza, Aug. 30, 1916, AC; Municipal president of Guanajuato to Carranza, Sept. 25, 1916, TVC, Guanajuato, carpeta 3. Carranza (hereafter cited as TVC), Guanajuato, carpeta 3.
73 General Manuel M. Diéguez to Carranza, April 11, 1919, AC.
74 136 soldiers from Matamoros to Carranza, March 8, 1916, AC.
75 Eliseo Arredondo to Carranza, Oct. 18, 1919, AC.
76 P.A. del Alijaya to Carranza, April 21, 1913, AC.
77 Carranza, Venustiano, El régimen constitucionalista, (Mexico City, 1919),Google Scholar decreto numero 23 de 11 de marzo de 1914, pp. 59–60. Interview with Lic. Ignacio Ramos Praslow, PHO, 1/35, pp. 14–15.
78 Written authorization of Pablo González, Dec. 4, 1913, Centro de Estudios de Historia de México, Mexico City, Manuscritos de Manuel González (hereafter cited as MMG), carpeta 8, no 852.
79 Governor of Yucatán to Carranza, Oct. 7, 1914, AC.
80 González to general Jesús Carranza, April 30, 1914, MMG, carpeta 15, no. 2210; Jesús Carranza to Avila, July 5, 1914, AC.
81 Carranza to Pedro de. V. Ryes, Jan. 7, 1915, AC.
82 Moats, Leone B., Thunder in their Veins, (New York, 1932), p. 155 Google Scholar; Salazar, , La Casa del Obrero Mundial, p. 80.Google Scholar For a survey of Carranza's reforms, see Richmond, Douglas W., “El nacionalismo de Carranza y los cambios socioeconómicos, 1915–1920,” Historia Mexicana, 26 (July-Sept. 1976), 107–31.Google Scholar
83 This theme is illustrated vividly in two poignant novels written by Fuentes, Carlos, La région mas transparente, (Mexico City, 1958)Google Scholar and La muerte de Artemio Cruz, (Mexico City, 1962).
84 Richmond, , Venustiano Carranza’s Nationalist Struggle, pp. 83–240.Google Scholar
85 Milpa Alta villagers to Carranza, June 2, 1918, AC.
86 For a brief analysis of Carranza’s government, see Richmond, Douglas W.. “Carranza: The Authoritarian Populist as Nationalist President,” in Wolfskill, George and Richmond, Douglas W., eds. Essays on the Mexican Revolution. (Austin, 1979), pp. 47–80.Google Scholar A truly excellent study of Carranza’s diplomacy within the context of his reforms is Freeman Smith, Robert, The United States and Revolutionary Nationalism in Mexico, 1916–1932, (Chicago, 1972).Google Scholar
87 370 Guadlajara munitions workers to Carranza, June 23, 1916, AC.
88 Interview with José López, PHO, 1/2, pp. 1–7.
89 Tapachula resident to Carranza, Nov. 16, 1915, AC.
90 José María Goribar to Carranza, Feb. 12, 1915, AC; Francisco Lizardi to Carranza, April 6, 1916, AC; Miguel A. Calapir to Carranza, Oct. 18, 1916, AC.
91 Turner, Frederick C., The Dynamic of Mexican Nationalism, (Chapel Hill, 1968), p. 212 Google Scholar; Navarro, González, Mexico: El capitalismo nacionalista, p. 219.Google Scholar
92 Secretary of State Robert Lansing to Special Representative Rodgers, June 22, 1916, Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, (Washington, D.C., 1923), 1916, p. 695. Ticotern-calf to Carranza, Aug. 31, 1914, AC; Gonzalo R. Zamarrieta to Carranza, May 4, 1916, AC; Juan Barragán Rodríguez to Carranza, May 10, 1916, AC; Turner, , The Dynamic of Mexican Nationalism, pp. 70–2,Google Scholar 216–8.
93 Various students to Carranza, June 19, 1916, AC; Alfonso de la Garza to Carranza, June 20, 1916, AC; Moisés Guevara to Carranza, Dec. 12, 1918, AC; L’Ambardin to Carranza, Feb. 13, 1915, AC.
94 Railroad workers to Carranza, Aug. 25, 1919, AC.
95 Carr, Barry, “Marxism and Anarchism in the Formation of the Mexican Communist Party, 1910–1919,” Hispanic American Historical Review, 63 (May, 1983), 277–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cantú, Gastón García, El Socialismo en Mexico, (Mexico City, 1969).Google Scholar
96 George Brémond to Carranza, May 24, 1915, AC; Ortiz Rubio to Carranza, April 11, 1915, AC.
97 Joseph, G. M., Revolution from without: Yucatán, Mexico, and the United States, 1880–1924, (New York, 1982), pp. 109–82.Google Scholar
98 Declaration of the Principles Accepted by the First National Socialist Congress, Held in Mexico City on the 25 of August to the 4th of September, 1919, Records of the Internal Affairs of Mexico, 1910–1929, Microcopy No. 274 (hereafter cited as RDS), 812.202 (0433).
99 Undated, confidential memo no. 1346, probably Nov. 1919, RDS. 812.202 (0431–0432). Fuentes, Manuel Marquez and Araujo, Octavio Rodríguez, El Partido Comunista Mexicano, (Mexico City, 1973), pp. 54,Google Scholar 60–1, 85, 87, 93.
100 Brandenburg, Frank, The Making of Modern Mexico, (Englewood Cliffs, 1964), p. 73.Google Scholar
101 Ann Wood, Carol, “The Comintern and the Mexican Communist Party,” M.A. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1971, pp. 22–3Google Scholar
102 Ibid., pp. 21-5. For the Comintern, see Máquez Fuentes and Rodríguez Araujo, El Partido Com-munista Mexicano.
103 Fowler, , “Origines laborales de la organización campesina en Veracruz,” p. 250 Google Scholar; Carr, , “Marxism and Anarchism,” pp. 294–305.Google Scholar
104 Fuentes, Márquez and Araujo, Rodríguez, El Partido Comunista Mexicano, pp. 64–6Google Scholar; Schmitt, Karl M., Communism in Mexico, (Austin, 1965), pp. 4–9 Google Scholar also describes communist activities.
105 Wood, , “The Comintern and the Mexican Communist Party,” pp. 27–8.Google Scholar That Carrranza was not reluctant to spend “fantastic amounts” of money on labor support is clear in Salazar, , Líderes y sindicatos, p. 154 Google Scholar
106 Confidential memo in RDS, 812.202(0431-0432).
107 Richmond, Venustiano Carranza’s Nationalist Struggle, chapter 10.
108 Although there are several monographs on the subject of Mexican nationalism, the only full-length study that deals directly with class conflict is Pedrueza, Rafael Ramos, La lucha de clases a través de la historia de México, 2 vols. (Mexico City, 1942).Google Scholar Similar is Spalding, Hobart A., Organized Labor in Latin America: Historical Case Studies of Urban Workers in Dependent Societies, (New York, 1977).Google Scholar