Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:19:52.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immigration and Religious Toleration: A Mexican Dilemma 1821–1860

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

Dieter Berninger
Dieter Berninger*
Affiliation:
Moorhead State University, Moorhead, Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three Weeks before the fall of Mexico City and the final victory over its conservative adversaries, the liberal government of Benito Juárez issued a law, on December 4, 1860, establishing freedom of religion in Mexico. Such a law had been a liberal objective throughout the early Reforma period and during the War of the Reform as well. In mid-1859 the Juárez government had issued a manifesto which stated that religious toleration was a requirement for national prosperity. The liberals saw toleration as an important precondition for foreign immigration—and immigration had been an established panacea for national problems since the achievement of independence in 1821. The 1860 law served to vindicate part of the Reforma program. It also sought to resolve almost four decades of debate on the relationship between foreigners, immigration, and religious toleration.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Americas , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , April 1976 , pp. 549 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1976 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Manifesto del Gobierno Constitucional de la Nación. Torre Villar, Ernesto de la, ed., El triunfo de la república liberal (Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1960), pp. 100, 110.Google Scholar

2 Gaceta Imperial de México, 6 October 1821, pp. 21–22; 13 December 1821, p. 229.

3 Aquila mexicana, 10 December 1823, p. 3.

4 Ibid., 11 December 1823, pp. 1–2.

5 Ward, Henry George, Mexico in 1827 (London: Henry Colburn, 1828), I, 351–352.Google Scholar Ward thought that in Buenos Aires and Colombia the participation of foreign Protestants in the struggle for independence had been a decisive factor in fostering a more tolerant attitude. In Mexico the goals of the revolution had been reinforced with symbols of a Catholic nature.

6 Ward, I, 350 355.

7 Ritchie, Archivaldo Tucker, Expediente seguido an este santo obispado relativo a mi intentado matrimonio. (Guadalajara: Imprenta de Esteban Alatorre, 29 February 1828), pp. 1–21 Google Scholar passim.

8 Ward, II, 712–713.

9 El Sol, 19 March 1826, pp. 1111–1112.

10 Ibid., 23 June 1826, p. 1498. Since language was always a problem between foreigners and Mexicans, the paper suggested that an Irish priest named Muldoon be retained in the hope that some foreigners could be converted.

11 Hale, Charles A., Mexican Liberalism in the Age of Dr. Mora (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), p. 165.Google Scholar

12 Héroles, Jesus Reyes, El liberalismo mexicano (3 vols., Mexico: Universidad Nacional de México, 1961), III, 259–261.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., III, 262.

14 Filasola, Vicente, Memorias para la historia de la guerra de Tejas (Mexico: R. Rafael, 1849), p. 598.Google Scholar

15 Rocafuerte, Vicente, Ensayo sobre la tolerancia religiosa (Mexico, 1831), p. 63.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., p. 67.

17 Ibid., pp. 60–61, 72–73.

18 Ibid., p. 82.

19 Reyes Héroles, III, 271.

20 Rocafuerte, pp. 89, 98 99.

21 Guerrero, J. M., Dictamen teológico (Mexico, 1831), n.p.Google Scholar

22 El Sol, 25 January 1832, p. 3785. The pamphlet was Impugnación a la nueva secta Sublimes Cristianos contenido en el ensayo sobre tolerancia religiosa por el ciud. Vicente Rocafuerte (Mexico, 1832).

23 Morales, Juan Bautista, Disertación contra la tolerancia religiosa (Mexico, 1833), pp. 16, 33–36, 58–59.Google Scholar

24 In Durango, for example, two anonymous pamphleteers clashed over the issue. See, Durango, Un ecelsiástico de, Disertación sobre la tolerancia de cultos (Durango, 1834) and his challenger, the unknown author of De la libertad de cultos y de su, influencia en la moral y la política (Victoria de Durango, 1834).Google Scholar

25 [Alamán, Lucas], Un regalo de año nuevo para el Sr. Rocafuerte, o consideración sobre sus consideraciones, escrito por uno que lo conoce (Mexico, 1832), p. 17.Google Scholar

26 See, for example, El Fénix de la Libertad, 15 March 1834, p. 93 and El Indicador de la Federación Mexicana, 15 January 1834, p. 238.

27 [Lafragua, José María], Memoria de la primera secretaría de estado y del despacho de relaciones interiores y exteriores de los Ēstados Unidos Mexicanos (Mexico, 1846), pp. 79, 86.Google Scholar

28 Maza, Francisco de la, Código de colonización y terrenos baldíos (Mexico, 1893), pp. 374–375, 390.Google Scholar The document in question is No. 221 of the Dirección de Colonización e Industria, dated 4 July 1848.

29 San Miguel, Juan Rodriguez de, “Tolerancia religiosa,” La Voz de la Religión, 2 August 1848, pp. 72–76.Google Scholar Hereafter cited La Voz.

30 José María de, Sollano, “Ecsamen filosófico sobre la tolerancia religiosa,” La Voz, 13 September 1848, pp. 282–283. Also his reply to El Monitor repúblicano, reprinted in La Voz, 11 October 1848, pp. 420–422.Google Scholar

31 La Voz, 14 October 1848, pp. 438, 441.

32 jaliciense, Un Católico, “Los que quieren tolerancia, o no saben lo que quieren, o no son católicos,” La Voz, 21 October 1848, pp. 459–462.Google Scholar

33 El Monitor repúblicano, 20 October 1848, p. 4.

34 Ibid., 20 August 1848, p. 3.

35 Ibid., 25 January 1849, pp. 99–100.

36 Ibid., 31 August 1848, p. 2.

37 Ibid., 12 July 1848, pp. 3–4; 17 July 1848, pp. 3 4; 13 January 1849, pp. 1–2.

38 Ibid., 12 July 1848, pp. 3–4.

39 Anon, . “Carta de Teóphilo a Philopatro,” La Voz, 15 August 1848, pp. 167–168.Google Scholar

40 Ibid., pp. 174–175.

41 El Monitor repúblicano, 20 August 1848, p. 3.

42 El Siglo XIX, 25 January 1849, pp. 99–100. The argument here was that the actions of fanatics should be branded illegal if they molested non-Catholics.

43 Ibid.

44 Voz, La, 26 August 1848, p. 224;Google Scholar J. M. C., , “La religión católica es firme apoyo de la República y la mejor garantia de los derechos del hombre y del ciudadano en los paises libres,” La Voz, 9 September 1848, pp. 272–273.Google Scholar

45 Sollano, Diez de, “Ecsamen filosófico …,” La Voz, 13 September 1848, pp. 283–286.Google Scholar

46 “Representación que los habitantes de Puebla elevan al Soberano Congreso de la Union contrariando los conatos que para establecer la tolerancia religiosa en nuestro pais aparecen hoy desgraciadamente,” La Voz, 15 November 1848, pp. 577–580.Google Scholar

47 “Representación que el bello secso de Orizaba hace al Soberano Congreso pidiendo no se admite en la Republica la libertad de cultos,” La Voz, 31 January 1849, pp. 136–139; 3 February 1849, p. 156.Google Scholar

48 Canseco, Juan José, “Inconvenientes de una colonización indiscreta,” La Voz, 28 March 1849, pp. 385–394.Google Scholar

49 El Siglo XIX, 25 January 1849, pp. 99–100.Google Scholar

50 El Monitor repúblicano, 9 July 1848, pp. 3–4; 15 July 1848, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

51 Ibid., 4 November 1848, p. 3.

52 La Voz, 2 August 1848, pp. 72, 76.

53 Ibid., 15 August 1848, pp. 171–174.

54 El Siglo XIX, 6 February 1849, p. 147.

55 La Voz, 14 October 1848, pp. 437–438.

56 “Representación de los vecinos de Guadalajara al Supremo Gobierno Federal contra la introdución de falsas religiones en el pais,” La Voz, 13 December 1848, p. 699.Google Scholar

57 “Manifestación que el Obispo de Oaxaca y su cabildo catedral hace por si y a nombre de todo su clero secular y regular sobre el proyecto de tolerancia religiosa,” La Voz, 29 November 1848, p. 639.Google Scholar

58 La Voz, 20 September 1848, p. 319.

59 El Siglo XIX, 25 February 1849, pp. 223–224.

60 El Monitor repúblicano, 22 February 1849, pp. 3–4.

61 Cotner, Thomas E., The Military and Political Career of José Joaquín de Herrera (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1951), pp. 280–282.Google Scholar

62 El Monitor repúblicano, 3 August 1849, p. 3.

63 Zarco, Francisco, Crónica del Congreso Extraordinario Constituyente, 1856–1857 (Mexico: El Colegio de Mexico, 1957), pp. 436–437.Google Scholar Zarco was editor of El Siglo XIX at the time of the Congress and provides an invaluable account of the proceedings. The pages cited list the delegates’ votes as well as the tension in the galleries during the vote, followed by a description of the delirium afterwards.

64 Zarco, Francisco, Historia del Congreso Extraordinario Constituyente, 1856–1857 (Mexico: El Colegio de Mexico, 1956), pp. 536, 613, 655, 671.Google Scholar

65 Ibid., pp. 677, 685.

66 Ibid., pp. 562–564.

67 Ibid., p. 574. The Mesilla Valley was transferred to the United States through the Gadsden Purchase of 1854. The sale, which gained ten million dollars for Santa Anna, was a favorite target of liberals. Its loss was not even remotely due to intolerance.

68 Ibid., pp. 648 659. Mata claimed that in 1848 Sartorius had readied 30,000 Germans for immigration to Mexico, but when toleration could not be guaranteed they went to the United States instead. Sartorius was a promoter of immigration after the war. See Sartorius, Christian, Importancia de México para la emigración alemana (Mexico, 1852).Google Scholar Both Mata and Gamboa referred to another failure in attracting Germans, in this case to the State of Nuevo León. El Siglo XIX carried copies of the correspondence between representatives of German immigrant groups in the United States and state officials. The Germans asked for guarantees of religious toleration, but Governor Santiago Vidaurri replied that although he was in favor of toleration, the matter rested with the federal government. The plan failed. El Siglo XIX, 4 February 1856, pp. 2–3.

69 An immense number of pamphlets, editorials, petitions and demonstrations accompanied the debate in Congress. For the most part these reflected the content of the debate in the Congress. The anti-tolerationists appear to have had the majority of the printing presses at their disposal.