Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:34:07.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The War With the United States and the Crisis in Mexican Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

Charles A. Hale
Charles A. Hale*
Affiliation:
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After a border skirmish at the Rio Grande on April 25, 1846, A Mexico and the United States were at war, and within a few months Zachary Taylor’s troops had overrun the north, reaching Monterrey and Saltillo. At the same time an expedition under Winfield Scott landed at Vera Cruz and pushed inward along the ancient road of conquest, reaching the gates of Mexico City by August, 1847. Mexican resistance was heroic and determined in spots, but disorganization and poor leadership played havoc with any attempt at national defense. The capital fell and was occupied by the invaders, the Mexican government fled to Querétaro, and an ignominious peace treaty was negotiated and accepted by the helpless Mexicans, though not without serious opposition from the radical (puro) element which favored a last-ditch resistance. With the rapid subjection of the country and the loss of more than half its territory, the once proud and optimistic nation of Iturbide was left stunned; and it turned to bitter reflection upon its paralyzed condition and its flagrant display of weakness when faced by a small and not too efficient force of invaders.

The very independence of Mexico was now threatened. Such an easy victory by a powerful neighbor would mean that Mexico might at any time be absorbed by the United States, especially when there was a movement for that purpose already afoot north of the Rio Grande. The easy optimism of the early days of the republic had now vanished. The shock of military disaster, after the dismal decade of mediocrity and humdrum military revolutions, accentuated a crisis in Mexican thought. Both liberals and conservatives now saw the necessity of imposing radical changes upon the course of independent Mexico. Since the overthrow of the radical Gómez Farias government in 1834, the country had been allowed to drift, and when the Americans invaded, its vigor appeared to be gone. In spite of the presence of a sizable moderate party, the factions became sharply differentiated as they had never been before in the history of the republic, except perhaps for the year 1832. Liberals and conservatives appealed to their traditional programs for solutions to Mexico’s crisis of 1847, and the seeds were sown for a great conflict.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Americas , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , October 1957 , pp. 153 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Fuller, John Douglas Pitts, The Movement for the Acquisition of all Mexico, 1846–1848 (Baltimore, 1936)Google Scholar. The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the Doherty Foundation in making this research possible.

2 Comer, T. E. has made a detailed study of Herrera’s administration. See The Military and Political Career of José Joaquín de Herrera, 1192–1854 (Austin, 1949), pp. 173–301 Google Scholar

3 El Siglo XIX, June 1, 1848.Google Scholar

4 Mora, Otero to (September 15, 1848), García, Genero (ed.), Documentos inéditos o muy raros para la historia de México (México, 1906), VI, 113.Google Scholar

5 El Monitor republicano, June 3, 1847.Google Scholar

6 Don Simplicio, periódico burlesco, critico y filosófico por unos simples, January 14, 1846.Google Scholar

7 Varios mexicanos, Consideraciones sobre la situación política y social de la república mexicana en el año 1841 (México, 1848)Google Scholar. It is possible that this exceptional pamphlet was written by Mariano Otero. The copy in the Basave Collection of the Biblioteca de México carries “Otero” written in, probably by Basave himself. The thoughtful yet critical tone of the writing and the moderate approach to peace and reforms certainly suggest Otero. It is to be hoped that someday the identity of the author can be established definitely.

8 Ibid., p. 4.

9 Ibid., p. 7.

10 Ibid., p. 6.

11 Ibid., p. 7.

12 Ibid., p. 19.

13 Ibid., p. 33.

14 Ibid., p. 28.

15 Ibid., pp. 46–52.

16 Ibid., p. 42. The statement was capitalized in the text.

17 Ibid., p. 56.

18 See Rejón, M. C., Observaciones del diputado saliente … contra los tratados de paz … (Querétaro, 1848), p. 35.Google Scholar

19 Letter of October 14, 1848. G. García (ed.), op. cit., p. 121.

20 Palacio, Vicente Riva (ed.), México a través de los siglos (Barcelona, 1888), IV, 718.Google Scholar

21 El Monitor republicano, June 24, 1849.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., June 18, 1851.

23 See Ocampo, Melchor, Letter to Garcia, D. A. (March 8, 1853), Obras completas (México, 1901), II, 291.Google Scholar

24 “Representación sobre reforma de aranceles y obvenciones parroquiales …” in Ocampo, La Religión, la iglesia, y el clero (México, 1948), p. 21.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., p. 32.

26 El Monitor republicano, July 6,1851.Google Scholar

27 Otero to Mora, May 13, 1849. Garcia (ed.), op. cit., p. 140.

28 La Política de los editores del tiempo analizada ante la nación (México, 1846), p. 14.Google Scholar

29 April 30, 1848.

30 See below p. 169.

31 de Estrada, Gutiérrez, México en 1840 y en 1841 (México, 1848), p. 17.Google Scholar

32 Cuevas, Luis G., Porvenir de México, o juicio critico sobre su estado político en 1821 y 1851 (México, 1851–1857), p. xi.Google Scholar

33 Alamán, , Documentos diversos (México, 1945–1947), IV (Obras, XII), 604.Google Scholar

34 El Universal, July 22, 1853.Google Scholar

35 El Tiempo, February 15, 1846.Google Scholar

36 El Orden, August 25, 1852 Google Scholar; also March 11, 1853. See also Algunos mexicanos. Manifiesto a la nación, (n.p., n.d. 1851?), p. 4.Google Scholar

37 El Universal, November 1, 1853.Google Scholar

38 El Orden, August 27, 1853.Google Scholar

39 El Universal, November 22, 1848.Google Scholar

40 Alamán, , Historia de Méjico (México, 1849–1852), V, 906.Google Scholar

41 El Universal, July 13, 1849.Google Scholar

42 Ibid., August 2, 1849.

43 The letter is dated March 23, 1853. It was communicated to Santa Anna by Antonio Haro y Tamariz, later a minister. For the text see Arrangoiz, Francisco de Paula, México desde 1808 hasta 1861 (Madrid, 1872), II, 335–340.Google Scholar

44 For a conservative view of relations with Santa Anna, see El Partido conservador en México (México, 1855)Google Scholar.

45 Cuevas, op. cit.

46 Ibid., p. 2.

47 Alamán, , Historia, V, 110.Google Scholar

48 Carta dirigida al escmo. sr. presidente de la republica sobre la necesidad de buscar en una convención el posible remedio de los males que aquejan a la república y opiniones del autor acerca del mismo asunto (México, 1840)Google Scholar.

49 See Cumplido, I., Manifestación al público del impresor … con motivo de su prisión … (México, 1840)Google Scholar.

50 Barca, Calderón de la, Life in Mexico (New York, 1913), p. 271.Google Scholar

51 Carta …, p. 84.

52 Ibid., p. 47.

53 Ibid., p. 37.

54 Ibid., p. 58.

55 See Alamán’s refutation of Tornel’s charge that he was a monarchist early in his life. Alamán, Historia, V, 807, n.

56 He did, that is, if we can assume him to be the editor of El Tiempo. Few contemporary sources deny it, and many writings from both sides point to him as the head of the monarchist party. Jorge Gurria Lacroix makes Alamán out to be a monarchist his entire life, but his claims cannot be documented. See Las Ideas monárquicas de Don Lucas Alamán (México, 1951)Google Scholar. See also Navarro, Moisés González, El Pensamiento político de Lucas Alamán (México, 1952), pp. 122–126.Google Scholar

57 El Tiempo, March 14, 1846 Google Scholar.

58 Ibid., January 29, 1846.

59 Freg, Arturo Arnaiz y, “Prólogo” to Alamán, Semblanzas e ideario (México, 1939), p. xxxiii.Google Scholar

60 This famous declaration was probably written by Alamán. See González Navarro, op. cit., p. 124.

61 Gutiérrez, México en 1840 y en 1847, p. 4.

62 Gutiérrez, , Le Mexique et l’Europe (Paris, 1847), p. 15.Google Scholar

63 El Tiempo, February 26, 1846.Google Scholar

64 Ibid., February 16, 1846.

65 José Vasconcelos attributes this idea to Alamán; it is a major factor in his re-creation of an Alamán legend Alamán, according to Vasconcelos, carried on the dream of Bolivar in advocating a league of Hispanic nations to counteract the Yankee menace. See his Bolivarismo y monroismo (Santiago de Chile, 1937)Google Scholar.

66 Algunos mexicanos, op. cit., p. 18.

67 El Universal, July 23, 1853.Google Scholar

68 Ibid., June 18, 1852.