No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Vagabundaje and Settlement Patterns in Colonial Northern Sonora
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2015
Extract
Frontiers are, by definition, unsettled and wild places; populations are shifting and mobile, social conditions are in state of constant flux, and governmental authority is generally weak. Frontier populations tend to be resentful of any type of control, and are often engaged in entreprenurial activities whose degree of legality varies widely. In frontier conditions, people the state defines as vagabonds and marginal tend to flourish. Their tenure as frontiersmen is usually brief, for they depend on the very conditions of instability which exist in areas with underdeveloped economies, weak authority, and sparse and spatially dispersed populations. Nevertheless, they can have an effect out of proportion to their numbers in a frontier society.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1988
References
1 Stern, Peter, “Social Marginality and Acculturation on the Northern Frontier of New Spain.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1984, p. 63.Google Scholar
2 Charles I to the Audiencia of Mexico, Toledo, December 4, 1528; in Richard Konetzke, editor, Colección de documentos para la historia de la formación social de hispanoamérica, 1483–1810, Madrid, 1953. v.I, p. 119.
3 See Stem, pp. 66–69, 71–75.
4 Padre Daniel Januske, San Francisco de Borja,[1723], Archivo Histórico de Hacienda, Temporalidades 278, México, D.F. (hereafter cited as AHH).
5 Rodríguez-Gallardo, J. Rafael, Informe sobre Sinaloa y Sonora. Edited by Viveros, Germán. México, 1975, p.27.Google Scholar
6 Stern, 105.
7 Juan Nentvig, S.J., Rudo Ensayo, A Description of Sonora and Arizona in 1764, translated and edited by Pradeau, Alberto and Rasmussen, Robert, Tucson, University of Arizona Press, 1980, p. 101.Google Scholar
8 Padre Reyes to Viceroy Bucareli, México, April 20, 1772, Archivo General de la Nación, Misiones 14, México, D.F. (hereafter cited as AGN).
9 Hastings, James, “People of Reason and Others: The Colonization of Sonora to 1767,” Arizona and the West 3:4 (1961), 321–340.Google Scholar
10 Ibid., pp. 330–331.
11 Rodrigues, Luis González, Etnología Y Misión En La Pimería Alta 1715–1740 (México City, 1977), pp. 161–163.Google Scholar
12 John, A. Donohue, S.J., After Kino: Jesuit Missions in Northwestern New Spain (Rome and Saint Louis, 1969) p. 70, 83.Google Scholar
13 Kessell, John, Mission of Sorrows: Jesuit Guevavi and the Pimas, 1691–1767 (Tucson, 1970), 1970, p. 61;Google Scholar and Herring, Patricia Roche, “The Silver of El Real del Arizónac,” Arizona and the West 20:3 (1978), 245–258.Google Scholar
14 Ms. San Antonio de Huquitoa Baptismal Register, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley (hereinafter cited as BLUC).
15 Mccarty, Kieran, translator and editor, Desert Documentary, (Tucson, 1976), pp. 32–33;Google Scholar and Kessell, John, Friars, Soldiers and Reformers: Hispanic Arizona and the Sonora Mission Frontier 1767–1856 (Tucson, 1976), p. 239.Google Scholar
16 In December of 1683, Gerónimo García de Terán, teniente de alcalde mayor in the Bacanuche and Cucurpe Valleys, sent:
this my order to the governors and constables from the pueblo[s] of Cucurpe, Taupe and [O]podepe…and [that] each governor bring fifteen certified Indians for two weeks, [and] that [the miners] will pay them for their work and [they] will be treated well; that they [are to work] for the benefit of the mines and the development of the royal income of His Majesty.
In May of the following year García de Terán ordered the Indian governor of Arizpe to send four Indians to work in the mines of Francisco Bautista. Quoted in Rodríguez, Gonzales, Etnología, pp. 150–151,Google Scholar note 22. When Jesuit missionary Eusebio Francisco Kino arrived in the Pimeria Alta in 1687, he carried an order from the Audiencia of Guadalajara exempting recently baptized mission Indians from repartimiento labor for twenty years. The order reflected the illegal use of newly baptized Indians for mine labor, which in turn provoked some resistance to the missions. Bolton, Herbert E., The Rim of Christendom: A Biography of Eusebio Francisco Kino, Pacific Coast Pioneer, (New York, 1960), p. 234.Google Scholar
17 Rodríguez, González, Etnología, pp. 125–146.Google Scholar
18 Ms. Anonymous, México City, June 17, 1771, “Noticia Breve De La Expedición Militar de Sonora y Cinaloa, su éxito felix, y ventajoso estado en que por consequencia de ella se han puesto ambas Provincias,” Archivo General de Indias, Seville, Spain, Audiencia de México 2477 (hereinafter cited as AGI).
19 Del Río, Ignacio, “Pretexto De Los Placeres y El Real De La Cieneguilla, Sonora,” from Simposio de Historia de Sonora: Memoria (Hermosillo, 1981), pp. 162–165.Google Scholar
20 Ibid., p. 166.
21 Ibid., p. 171.
22 Ibid., p. 173.
23 Ms. Pedro Tueros, la Cieneguilla, December 25, 1773, “Padrón General de los vecinos avitantes de esta Nueva Población de el Real de Sn Yldefonso de la Cieneguilla,” AGN, Provincias Internas 247.
24 Mccarty, , Desert Documentary, p. 22–23.Google Scholar
25
Ms. Tueros, “Padrón General de los Vecinos. …” The actual family size of the settler population was as follows:
26 Ms. La Purísima Concepción de Caborca Marriage Register, Altar Parish Archive, Altar, Sonora.
27 Quoted in Mccarty, , Desert Documentary, pp. 22–23.Google Scholar
28 Quoted in Ibid., pp. 20–21.
29 Ibid., pp. 22–23.
30 Del Río, “Del Rio, “Pretexto de los Placeres…,” pp. 174–175.
31 Ms. Pedro de la Serna, San Francisco de Asís del Oro, November 25, 1804, “Resultado de lo que comprehende la subdelegación del Real de San Yldefonso de la Sieneguilla, su jurisdición en las Provincias de Sonora y Sinaloa;” Archivo Franciscano 37/822, Biblioteca Nacional, México, D.F. (hereinafter cited as AF).
32 Del Río, “Pretexto de los Placeres…,” p. 176.
33 Ms. José María Paz y Goicochea to Francisco Rouset, Cieneguilla, November 13, 1803; Arcivo del Gobierno Eclesiástico de la Mitra de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora (hereinafter cited as AGEMS).
34 Kessell, , Friars, Soldiers, and Reformers, p. 203.Google Scholar
35
The breakdown on the average family size is as follows:
A possible explanation for the lower average family size among the Yaqui and Nijora population is a high mortality from the 1816 smallpox epidemic. The Yaqui-Nijora population suffered the highest mortality—213 deaths in 1816 and an excess of 134 deaths over baptisms, as against 48 deaths and 37 baptisms for the Spaniards and Castas.
36 The total number of niños and niñas was 196; 49 of Spaniards, 72 of castas, and 75 Yaquis and Níjoras.
37 Ms. Francisco Xavier Vásquez, San Francisco de Asís, July 29, 1817, “Padrón de este curato RI. de San Yldefonso de la Cieneguilla.” AGEMS.
38 Radding, Cynthia,“Las estructuras socio-económicas de las misiones de la Pimería Alta,” Noroeste de Mexico 3 (1979), table following page 80.Google Scholar
39 Ms. Francisco Xavier Vásquez to Lázaro de la Garza, Cieneguilla, May 31, 1845, AGEMS; and Lorenzo Vásquez to Lázaro de la Garza, Guadalupe de Aitar, March 23, AGEMS.
40 Ms. José de Aguilar to Lázaro de la Garza, Ures, June 9, 1849, AGEMS; and Francisco Xavier Vásquez to Lázaro de la Garza, Caborca, November 15, 1849, AGEMS.
41 Padre Reyes to Viceroy Bucareli, México, April 20, 1772; AGN Misiones 14.
42 Mccarty, Kieran, A Spanish Frontier in the Enlightened Age: Franciscan Beginnings in Sonora and Arizona, 1767–1770 (Washington, D.C., 1981), p. 58.Google Scholar
43 Ms. Santa Maria Soamca Baptismal and Burial Registers, BLUC.
44 Romeral, Pedro Tamarón y, Demonstración Del Vastísimo Obispado de la Nueva Vizcaya (México, D.F., 1937), p. 304.Google Scholar
45 Dobyns, Henry, Spanish Colonial Tucson: A Demographic History (Tucson, 1976), pp. 17, 22.Google Scholar
46 Juan Nentvig, S.J., Rudo Ensayo, A Description of Sonora and Arizona in 1764, translated and edited by Pradeau, Alberto and Rasmussen, Robert, (Tucson, 1980), p. 126.Google Scholar
47 Ms. San Ignacio de Caborica Baptismal Register, BLUC; and Radding, Cynthia, “La acumulación originaria de capital agraria en Sonora: la comunidad indígena y la hacienda en Pimería Alta y Opatería, 1768–1868,” Noroeste De México 5 (1981), p.24.Google Scholar
48 The 1801 census of San Ignacio mission and its visitas notes that Ymuris had been depopulated, and occupied by non-Piman settlers. Ms. Josef Pérez, O.F.M., San Ignacio, December 31, 1801, “Padrón de los Naturales de esta Misión de San Ygnacio,” AGEMS.
49 Teodoro de Croix, Arizpe, December 23, 1780, AGI, Audiencia de Guadalajara 272.
50 Ms. Pérez, “Padrón de los Naturales…,” AGEMS.
51 Ms. José Pérez, O.F.M., Oquitoa, December 31, 1818, “Estado Espiritual y Temporal de las Misiones de la Pimería Alta de esta Provincia de Sonora,” AGN Misiones 13.
52 See Moorhead, Max, The Presidio Bastion of the Borderlands (Norman, 1975);Google Scholar Kessell, Friars, Soldiers and Reformers; and Dobyns, Spanish Colonial Tucson.
53 Moorhead, , The Presidio, p. 222.Google Scholar
54 Ms. Pedro de Arriquibar, Tucson, August 6, 1796; Special Collections, University of Arizona Library.
55 Moorhead, , The Presidio, p. 222.Google Scholar
56 Ibid., pp. 222–223.
57 Ibid., p. 225.
58 Kessell, , Friars, Soldiers and Reformers, pp. 128, 132–133.Google Scholar
59 Ibid., p. 163.
60 Ms. Bernardo de Urrea, Altar, March 21, 1767, “Padrón de el vezindario que existe oy en este Real Prez,” AF 33/905; Ms. Francisco Elías González, Terrenate, April 6, 1767, “Padrón yndibidual del vesindario de este dho presidio,” AF 33/905; and Ms. Juan Baptista de Anza, Tubac, April 2, 1767, “padrón que forma para la quenta del Becindario que existe en este Real Presidio de San Ygnacio de Tubac,” AF 33/905.
61 Antonio Bonilla, Terrenate, 1774, “Revista pasada por el Capitán de Infantería D. Antonio Bonilla Ayudante Inspector de los Presidios internos de esta Nueva España a la Compañía de dotación del expresado Presidio,” AGI Audiencia de Guadalajara 272.
62 Ms. Anonymous, “Estado de los Soldados de esta compañía con distinción de Nombres, edad, patria, robusto, calidad, y circumstancias de cada uno,” from Bonilla, “Revista.”
63 Ms. Antonio Bonilla, Terrenate, June 4, 1774, “Estado General Del Vecindario Del Presidio de S[an] Felipe de Jesús de Guevavi alias Terrenate,: from Bonilla, “Revista.”
64 Ibid.
65 Ibid.
66 Hu-DeHart, Evelyn, Missionaries, Miners, and Indians: Spanish Contact with the Yoqui Nation of Northwestern New Spain (Tucson, 1981) pp. 5, 50.Google Scholar
67 Ibid., pp. 88–89.
68 Mccarty Kieran, O.F.M., A Spanish Frontier in the Enlightened Age, Franciscan Beginnings in Sonora and Arizona, 1767–1770, (Washington, D.C., 1981), p. 12.Google Scholar
69 Hu-DeHart, , Missionaries, Miners, and Indians, pp. 94–95.Google Scholar
70 Ibid., p. 98.
71 Ms. Francisco Crespo to Antonio María Bucareli, Horcasitas, February 20, 1776, AGN Provincias Internas 246.
72 Kessell, , Friars, Soldiers, and Reformers, pp. 202, 253–254.Google Scholar
73 Rodríguez, González, Etnología, p. 51.Google Scholar
74 For 1818 from Ms. José Pérez, O.F.M., Oquitoa, December 31, 1818, “Estado Espiritual y Temporal…,” AGN Misiones 13; for 1819 from Ms. Faustino González, O.F.M., Caborca, January 4, 1820, “Estado Espiritual y Tmeporal de las Misiones de la Pimería Alta de esta Provincia de Sonora,” AGN Misiones 3; and for 1820 from Ms. Faustino González, O.F.M., Caborca, January 4, 1821,” Estado Espiritual y Temporal de las Misiones de la Pimería Alta de esta Provincia de Sonora,” AGEMS.
75 Padre Reyes to Viceroy Bucareli, México, April 20, 1772, AGN Misiones 14.