No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Neighborly Concern: John Nevin Sayre and the Mission of Peace and Goodwill to Nicaragua, 1927-28
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2015
Extract
For almost two decades prior to 1927 Nicaragua had been governed by Washington “more completely than the American Federal Government rules any state in the Union.” Such governance was justified by the State Department which raised the specter of the Monroe Doctrine not only to bolster America's economic ambitions in the region but also to protect the nation's national security — a fact which took on added importance due to the recent construction of the Panama Canal. From 1912 to 1925, a Legation Guard of United States Marines reminded the country of the overwhelming American dominance. For only a brief period did America's military presence abate. In 1926, however, a civil war broke out that threatened to destroy the political and economic stability the United States had come to rely on. American military assistance was requested and quickly rendered. What events led to U.S. military action in this Central American country?
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1988
Footnotes
I wish to thank the American Historical Association for a 1984 Albert J. Beveridge Research Grant. In addition, I am deeply indebted to Mrs. Wilma Mosholder of the Swarthmore College Peace Collection. She is the true Sayre scholar and I merely her assistant.
References
1 Quoted in Denny, Harold N., Dollars for Bullets: The Story of American Rule in Nicaragua (NY: Dial Press, 1929), 9.Google Scholar Representative works relating to Nicaragua are the following: Wood, Bryce, The Making of the Good Neighbor Policy (NY: W.W. Norton & Co., 1967)Google Scholar; Macaulay, Neil, The Sandino Affair (Chicago: Quadrangle, 1967)Google Scholar; Munro, Dana G., The Latin American Republics: A History (NY: Appleton-Century, 1950)Google Scholar & Intervention and Dollar Diplomacy in the Caribbean, 1900–1921 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964); Porter, Charles O. & Alexander, Robert J., The Struggle for Democracy in Latin America (NY: Macmillan & Co., 1961)Google Scholar; Perkins, Dexter, The United States and the Caribbean (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1947)Google Scholar; Cox, Isaac J., Nicaragua and the United States (Washington, D.C.: World Peace Foundation, 1927)Google Scholar; Kamman, William, Search for Stability: Nicaragua, 1925–1933 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968)Google Scholar; Stimson, Henry L., American Policy in Nicaragua (NY: Macmillan & Co., 1927)Google Scholar; A Brief History of the Relations between the United States and Nicaragua, 1909–1928 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1928).
2 In Latin America, Sandino was almost invariably pictured as a nationalist-patriot defying American omnipotence. According to La Nación (Buenos Aires): “Sandino represents the popular sentiments in Nicaragua…[he] is not a bandit but one of the many revolutionists found in the history of Latin America.” Quoted in The Ambassador in Argentina (Bliss) to the Secretary of State, January 13, 1928, Henry L. Stimson Papers, National Archives, Washington, D.C.
3 For a sympathetic biographical sketch of Sayre’s life see, Swomley, John M., “John Nevin Sayre: Peacemaker,” Fellowship (November 1977,Google Scholar June 1978, January-February 1979, November 1979). See also, Chatfield, Charles, For Peace and Justice: Pacifism in America, 1914–1941 (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Allen, Devere, ed., Adventurous Americans (NY: Farrar & Rinehart, 1932) & Pacifism in the Modern World (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Doran & Co., 1929);Google Scholar Curti, Merle, Peace or War: The American Struggle, 1636–1936 (NY: W.W. Norton & Co., 1936).Google Scholar
4 Sayre, John Nevin, “A Try at Peace and Justice with Sandino,” World Tomorrow (March 1928), 113.Google Scholar
5 John Nevin Sayre, “Instrument of Peace,” Unpublished memoir, Swarthmore College Peace Collection, DG 117, 128–33. Consult also, Page, Kirby, Dollars and World Peace (NY: George H. Doran & Co., 1927)Google Scholar; Wilkins, Mira, The Maturing of Multinational Enterprise: American Business Abroad from 1914 to 1970 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974), 153–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Langley, Lester D., The Banana Wars: An Inner History of American Empire (Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 1983).Google Scholar
6 Sayre, , “Instrument of Peace,” 131.Google Scholar
7 Forbes, John, The Quakers Under Seven Flags, 1917–1927 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Jones, Lester, Quakers in Action: Recent Humanitarian and Reform Activities of the American Quakers (NY: Macmillan Co., 1929)Google Scholar; Hoxie Jones, Mary, Swords Into Ploughshares: An Account of the American Friends Service Committee, 1917–1937 (NY: Macmillan Co., 1937).Google Scholar
8 Robert Cuba Jones, “The FOR-AFSC Joint Peace Mission to Nicaragua, 1927–28,” in John Nevin Sayre Papers, SCPC, DG 117. In 1926, Douglas took part in the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom mission to Haiti in order to survey conditions there following 11 years of marine occupation. The six member delegation, led by Emily Greene Balch, urged the Coolidge Administration to retain American-maintained health and sanitation facilities while removing military forces as a sign of its respect for the independence of the Haitian people. As Douglas observed: “Our recent experience have indicated that America may well be at a point where it must decide whether it shall be an empire or a democracy.” ( Douglas, Paul A., “The American Occupation of Haiti II,” Political Science Quarterly 42, No. 3, September 1927, 395–97)Google Scholar.
9 Russell, Elbert, Quaker-An Autobiography (Jackson.TN: Friendly Press, 1956), 253–60Google Scholar. Macaulay’s The Sandino Affair incorrectly states that Russell was the leader of the peace mission; only one paragraph is devoted to the mission. See, pp. 97–8.
10 Sayre, , “Instrument of Peace,” 120–30.Google Scholar
11 Diary of John Nevin Sayre, November 18th to 23rd, Sayre Papers, SCPC, DG 117.
12 Ibid., November 23rd.
13 Jones, , “The FOR-AFSC Joint Mission,” 3.Google Scholar
14 Ibid., 3–4. See also, Jones, Robert Cuba, “The Future of Nicaragua,” Friends Intelligencer (June 23, 1934), 40 Google Scholar; Millétt, Richard Leroy, Guardians of the Dynasty (NY: Orbis Books, 1977), 65–80, 125–40, 265–70.Google Scholar
15 John Nevin Sayre, handwritten speech, December 11, 1927, Sayre Papers.
16 Jones, , “The FOR-AFSC Joint Mission,” 5.Google Scholar
17 Sayre Diary, December 14, 1927.
18 Ibid., December 14, 1927.
19 Sayre, , “A Try at Peace,” 114.Google Scholar
20 Dana G. Munro, Telegram to State Department, December 20, 1927, John Nevin Sayre Papers. Also located in the National Archives.
21 W.W. Cumberland to Dorothy Detzer, December 28, 1927, Sayre Papers. For more information on Cumberland’s role in Nicaragua, consult Merle Curtis and Birr, Kendall A., Prelude to Point Four (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1954), 164–5.Google Scholar
22 Sayre, , “A Try at Peace,” 114.Google Scholar
23 Sayre Diary, December 16, 1927.
24 Ibid., December 19, 1927.
25 Sayre, , “A Try at Peace,” 115.Google Scholar Official U.S. policy always referred to the Sandinistas as “bandits” thus denying them political credibility.
26 New York Times, May 30, 1927, 6. Consult the following articles: Tierney, John J. Jr., “U.S. Intervention in Nicaragua, 1927–1933: Lessons for Today,” Orbis 14 (Winter, 1971), 1012–28Google Scholar; Baylen, Joseph O., “Sandino: Patriot or Bandit?” Hispanic American Historical Review (August 1951).Google Scholar
27 Sayre Diary, December 20, 1927.
28 Ibid., December 25, 1927.
29 Sayre, , “A Try at Peace,” 115.Google Scholar
30 Ibid., 115.
31 Sayre Diary, December 27, 1927.
32 Ibid., December 27, 1927; Sayre, “A Try at Peace,” 116.
33 Sayre Diary, December 27, 1927.
34 Sayre, , “A Try at Peace,” 116.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 117.
36 Sayre Diary, December 29, 1927; Munro to the Secretary of State, December 30, 1927, Department of State Records, National Archives, Microfilm Reel #37.
37 Sayre Diary, January 2, 1928; “Nicaragua’s Bloody Peace,” Literary Digest (January 14, 1928, 8.
38 Quoted in Macaulay, , The Sandino Affair, 107 Google Scholar. Also see, Augusto Sandino to Sayre & Jones, January 1, 1928, Marine Corps Historical Archives, Arlington, Virginia, Box 10, Folder 2; Cummings, Lejeune, Quijote on a Burro (Mexico: Impresora Azteca, 1958), 117–18.Google Scholar
39 Bartlett, Tom, “The Banana War Machine,” Leatherneck LXVII (September, 1984), 16–18 Google Scholar; Utley, Major Harold H., USMC, “An Introduction to the Tactics and Techniques of Small Wars,” The Marine Corps Gazette (May 1931), 48–52 Google Scholar; Pagano, Dom A., Bluejackets (Boston: Meador Publishing Co., 1932), 124–37Google Scholar; Annual report of the Secretary of the Navy FY 1928 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1928), 60–66; United States Marine Corps, Historical Records & Research Section, Federal Records Center, Suitland, Maryland, , Records of Marine Corps Units in Nicaragua, 1927–1933.Google Scholar
40 Quoted in “U.S. Intervention in Nicaragua,” 1021.
41 Commander, Special Service Squadron (Sellers) to the Chief of Naval Operations, January 3, 1928, the Papers of Admiral David F. Sellers, Library of Congress.
42 Telegram, Peace Mission to President Coolidge, January 4, 1928, Sayre Papers.
43 Sayre, John Nevin, “The Making of Peace,” Unpublished paper, January 3, 1928, Sayre Papers.Google Scholar
44 Sayre Diary, January 19, 1928.
45 Vinson, John C., William E. Borah and the Outlawry of War (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1957), 115–18Google Scholar; New York Times, December 25, 1926, 2.
46 Paul Jones to Sayre, January 6, 1928, Sayre Papers.
47 New York Times, January 18, 1928; U.S. Congress, Senate 70th Congress, 1st Session, January 20, 1928, Congressional Record, Volume 69, Part 2, 1785.
48 Sayre, “A Try at Peace,” 117.
49 Memorandum on Nicaraguan Situation, Department of State, January 1927, located in Sayre Papers; Sayre Diary, January 17, 1928.
50 George Norris to John Nevin Sayre, 1928 (exact date not determined), Sayre Papers.
51 John Nevin Sayre, “The Position of the United States in Nicaragua,” February 24, 1928, Unpublished paper, Sayre Papers.
52 John Nevin Sayre, Unpublished Report on Nicaragua, 1928, Sayre Papers. Also consult, Charles DeBenedetti, , Origins of the Modern American Peace Movement, 1915–1929 (Millwood, NY: KTO Press, 1978), 174–80.Google Scholar
53 New York Times, January 25, 1928; Washington Daily News, January 25, 1928; St. Louis Daily Globe Democrat, March 3, 1928; Des Moines Tribune Capital, March 20, 1928.
54 Quoted in “Nicaragua’s Bloody Peace,” 8.
55 John Nevin Sayre, “Nicaragua: Test of the U.S.A.,” 1928, Unpublished Paper, Sayre Papers.
56 FOR in Latin America Newsletter #3, Charles A. Thomson, February 14, 1930.
57 John Nevin Sayre to President Hoover, July 8, 1930, Sayre Papers.
58 Walter C. Thurston to John Nevin Sayre, July 17, 1930, Sayre Papers; Langley, , The Banana Wars, 217–20.Google Scholar
59 The Minister in Nicaragua (Hanna) to the Secretary of State, November 4, 1932, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1932, Vol. V (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1943), 878.
60 Gregorio Sandino to John Nevin Sayre, May 12, 1928, Sayre Papers.
61 E. Lara to John Nevin Sayre, January 25, 1928, Sayre Papers.
62 “Objectives of the First Trip Through Central America of the Latin American Secretary of the F.O.R.,” October 21, 1929-January 20, 1930, Sayre Papers.
63 Jones, , “The FOR-AFSC Joint Mission,” 7–8.Google Scholar
64 “Objectives of the First Trip,” Sayre Papers.
65 DeBenedetti, Charles, “The American Peace Movement and the State Department in the Era of Locarno” in Wank, Solomon, ed., Doves and Diplomats (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1978), 203–4.Google Scholar
66 On the belief structure of the State Department careermen consult, Schulzinger, Robert D., The Making of the Diplomatic Mind: The Training, Outlook, and Style of United States Foreign Service Officers, 1908–1931 (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
67 DeBenedetti, , “The American Peace Movement and the State Department,” 210.Google Scholar
68 Braeman, John, “Power and Diplomacy: The 1920s Reappraised,” Review of Politics 44, No. 3 (July, 1982), 357–60.Google Scholar
69 Bemis, Samuel F. noteworthy The Latin American Policy of the United States (NY: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1943)Google Scholar is decidedly biased in its account. According to Bemis, the United States “Enforced” fair-and-free elections which brought back peace and prosperity. “All this took place with general satisfaction in Nicaragua,” Bemis wrote. But who really prospered? See pages 212–13.
70 The Assistant Secretary of State (White) to the Minister in Honduras (Summerlin) July 11, 1928, White Papers, National Archives.
71 Memorandum of a State Department Conference, April 18, 1931, Department of State Records, National Archives, File Box #5530.
72 Robert E. Olds, Memorandum on Nicaraguan Situation, January 1927, 1–4.
73 Smith, Gaddis, “The Legacy of Monroe’s Doctrine,” New York Times Magazine (September 9, 1984), 46, 124–8Google Scholar; Perkins, Dexter, Hands Off: A History of the Monroe Doctrine (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1948)Google Scholar passim; Gutman, Roy, “Invasion of Nicaragua Discouraged,” Newsday, September 2, 1984 Google Scholar, 9, 15; Thompson, Morris S., “Nicaragua Views U.S. With Eye of Distrust,” Newsday, September 18, 1984, 4, 24–5.Google Scholar
74 An excellent scholarly analysis of the current dilemma facing U.S. foreign policy in Central America is LaFeber, Walter, “The Reagan Administration and Revolutions in Central America” in Caraley, Demetrios, ed., The President’s War Powers from the Federalists to Reagan (NY: The Academy of Political Science, 1984)Google Scholar. According the LaFeber, U.S. officials have not been able to “square their policies with Thomas Jefferson’s theory of self-determination. The contradiction between Jefferson’s ideals and North American actions in Central America appeared in his lifetime; by the time of Theodore Roosevelt the United States explicitly defined such self-determination unilaterally and in its own interests…As poverty accelerated, revolution erupted.” See pages 202–4.