Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:49:12.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Decline of Slavery in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

Dennis N. Valdés
Dennis N. Valdés*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The history of African slave societies in the New World can be divided into three distinct phases—formation, maturity and decline. The third, the demise of the slave order, will be the focus of attention in the present discussion. There appear to be three general patterns to the decline of slave societies in the Americas. The first, exemplified by the United States and Haiti, came quickly, but at a time when the slave order was deeply entrenched, engendering profound resistance accompanied by a civil war. In the second, demonstrated by Cuba and Brazil, it occurred over the course of a few decades, involving a more varied combination of international pressure, slave resistance and a transformation of the labor regime utilizing both recently freed slaves and imported foreign workers. Of the third prototype, in which Mexico and Colombia represent cases in point, it was a seemingly undramatic, very slow process encompassing several generations, during which slavery appeared to wither away. This essay will examine the fate of slavery in Mexico, a topic which has been mentioned in various works, but has not been examined in detail. It is important not only for comparative purposes, but also for understanding the social history of late-colonial Mexico.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Americas , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 167 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Heroles, Jesus Reyes, El Liberalismo Mexicano (3 vols., Mexico, 1957–1961), 1, 28–29 Google Scholar; Acuna, Rodolfo, Occupied America (San Francisco, 1972), 12 Google Scholar; Morris, Richard B., “The American Revolution and the Mexican War for Independence; Parallels and Divergences,” in El Colegio de Mexico and American Historical Association, eds, Dos Revoluciones: Mexico y los Estados Unidos (Mexico, 1976), 27.Google Scholar

2 Smith, Justin H., The Annexation of Texas (New York, 1941), 9 Google Scholar; Barker, Eugene H., Mexico and Texas, 1821–1835 (Dallas, 1928), 77–78 Google Scholar; Parkes, Henry Bamford, A History of Mexico (Boston, 1970), 201 ff.Google Scholar

3 Palmer, Colin, Slaves of the White God: Blacks in Mexico, 1570–1650 (Cambridge, Mass., 1976), 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Beltran, Gonzalo Aguirre, “The Integration of the Negro in the National Society of Mexico,” in Morner, Magnus, ed., Race and Class in Latin America (New York, 1970), 16 Google Scholar; Chavez-Hita, Adelo Naveda, “La esclavitud negra en la jurisdiccion de la villa de Cordoba en el siglo XVIII,” (Tésis de maestria en historia, Universidad Veracruzana, 1977), 67.Google Scholar

4 Palmer, , Slaves, 3.Google Scholar

5 Borah, Woodrow and Cook, Sherburne F., Essays in Population History. Vol. 2. Mexico and the Caribbean. (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, 1974), 180.Google Scholar

6 Borah, Woodrow, New Spain’s Century of Depression (Berkeley, 1951)Google Scholar; Chevalier, Francois, Land and Society in Colonial Latin America: The Great Hacienda (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1970).Google Scholar

7 See especially Gibson, Charles, the Aztecs Under Spanish Rule, (Stanford, 1964),Google Scholar Ch. 9. See also Bakewell, Peter, Silver Mining and Society in Colonial Mexico: Zacatecas, 1546–1700 (Cambridge, 1972), 200,Google Scholar whose case study of the silver mining region of Zacatecas, concludes, “The most obvious inference to be drawn from these observations is that there were enough Indians available to man the Zacatecas mining industry, so long as the rewards were attractive enough.”

8 Palmer, , Slaves, 187.Google Scholar

9 Palmer, , Slaves, 79 Google Scholar; Bakewell, , Silver Mining, 124.Google Scholar

10 Barrett, Ward, The Sugar Hacienda of the Marqueses del Valle, (Minneapolis, 1970), 79–80.Google Scholar

11 Gibson, , The Aztecs, 243 Google Scholar; Super, John C., “Queretaro Obrajes: Industry and Society in Provincial Mexico, 1600–1810,” Hispanic American Historical Review (hereafter cited as HAHR), 56 (May 1976), 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Gage, Thomas, The English-American, or a New Survey of the West Indies (London, 1928), 85–87 Google Scholar; Palmer, , Slaves, 45–46.Google Scholar

13 Gibson, , The Aztecs, 249–52.Google Scholar

14 The most important price index, maize, is examined in Florescano, Enrique, Precios del maíz y crisis agrícolas en México (1708–1810) (Mexico, 1969), 181,Google Scholar cuadro 19.

15 Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico City (hereafter cited as AGN), Inquisicion, 912.24 (1747). Also in the year 1747, the Governor of the Estate of the Cortes family abolished the practice of using Indian prisoners in sugar mills, Barrett, , The Sugar Hacienda, 86.Google Scholar

16 Beltran, Gonzalo Aguirre, “The Slave Trade in Mexico,” HAHR 24 (Aug. 1944), 414, 427.Google Scholar

17 Palmer, , Slaves, 26.Google Scholar

18 Beltran, Aguirre, “The Slave Trade”, 427.Google Scholar

19 Data for the period 1580 to 1650 taken from Bowser, Frederick, “The Free Person of Color in Mexico City and Lima: Manumission and Opportunity, 1580–1650,” in Engerman, Stanley L. and Genovese, Eugene D., eds., Race and Slavery in the Western Hemisphere: Quantitative Studies (Stanford, 1975), 331–68.Google Scholar For the period from the 1660s to the 1780s, samples of the notarial registers, taken by notary number, of the Archivo de Notarías del Departamento del Distrito Federal, Mexico City (here-after cited as AN), were taken. Notaries’ numbers listed as follows: 9, 14, 18, 20, 132, 142, 143, 196, 209, 253, 257, 270, 338, 350, 382, 386, 391, 392, 400, 403, 415, 454, 480, 504, 519, 569, 589, 590, 591, 632, 687, 700, 741, 742, and 745. The sample periods cover the years 1663–69 (35 cases), 1692–1698 (210 cases), 1721–1727 (222 cases), 1750–1756 (122 cases) and 1779–1785 (26 cases). The small sample of the 1660s was taken only to establish a link with the Bowser data. The small sizes of the 1750s and 1780s are due to the disappearance of deeds of slave sales from the registers at these periods in time. The same registers were used for gathering Cartas de libertad.

20 On the flood, see especially, Gibson, , The Aztecs, 236 ff.Google Scholar; Hoberman, , “Bureaucracy and Disaster: Mexico City and the Great Flood of 1629,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 6 (1974), 211–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Boyer, Richard Everett, “Mexico City and the Great Flood: Aspects of Life and Society 1629–1635,” (Ph.D. diss., University of Connecticut, 1973).Google Scholar

21 Chávez-Hita, Naveda, “La esclavitud negra,” 68.Google Scholar

22 Adriana Naveda Chávez-Hita, “Trabajadores esclavos en las haciendas azucareras de Córdoba, Ver., 1714–1763,” paper presented at the V Reunion de Historiadores Mexicanos y Norteamericanos, Patzcuaro, Michoacan, 12–15 Octubre, 1977, 6.

23 See, e.g., Naveda Chávez-Hita, 1 lTrabajadoes esclavos,” 5; Aimes, Hubert H.S., A History of Slavery in Cuba 1511–1868 (New York and London, 1907), 267 Google Scholar; Rout, Leslie B., The African Experience in Spanish America (London, New York and Melbourne, 1976); 72, 324, 325Google Scholar; Beltran, Gonzalo Aguirre, La población negra de Mexico (Mexico, 1972), 30 Google Scholar; Fraginals, Manuel Moreno, Klein, Herbert S. and Engerman, Stanley L., “The Level and Structure of Prices on Cuban Slave Plantations in the Mid-Nineteenth Century: some Comparative Perspectives,” American Historical Review 88 (Dec. 1983), 1210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sharp, William Frederick, Slavery on the Spanish Frontier: The Colombian Choco, 1680–1810 (Norman, 1976), 203 Google Scholar; Dean, Warren, Rio Claro: A Brazilian Plantation System, 1820–1920 (Stanford, 1976), 58.Google Scholar

24 For urban cases in Latin America, see Bowser, , “The Free Person,” 336–337 Google Scholar; Fraginals, Moreno et al., “Level and Structure,” 1211–12.Google Scholar

25 For the urban United States, see Goldin, Claudia Dale, Urban Slavery in the American South, 1820–1860: A Quantitative History (Chicago and London, 1976), 72–73.Google Scholar

26 Taken from calculations of Beltran, Aguirre, La población negra, 210 219, 222.Google Scholar (Tables VI, X and XII).

27 Barrett, , The Sugar Hacienda, 78–79 Google Scholar; Chávez-Hita, Naveda, “Trabajadores esclavos,” 3.Google Scholar

28 Brading, David, Miners and Merchants in Bourbon Mexico, 1759–1810 (Cambridge, 1971), 254, 259.Google Scholar

29 Greenleaf, Richard E., “The Obraje in the Late Mexican Colony,” The Americas, 23 (Jan. 1967), 227–50,CrossRefGoogle Scholar the most recent work on the topic, makes no mention of labor. However, court cases of the Audiencia and Inquisition offer many cases of free mulatto obraje workers.

30 AGN, Padrones, 52.

31 Mclaughlin, Colin and Jaime Rodriguez, O. The Forging of the Cosmic Race: A Reinterpretation of Colonial Mexico (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1980), 222.Google Scholar

32 Instrucciónes que los virreyes de Nueva Espana dejaron a sus sucesores (Mexico, 1873), I, 72, 106, 259; Gemelli Careri, John Francis, A Voyage Round the Word, in Vol 4 Google Scholar of Churchill, Awsham, ed., A Collection of Voyages and Travels (London, 1704), 4, 520 Google Scholar; Gage, , The English-American, 85–87.Google Scholar

33 Discussion of the price differences between bozales and American-born blacks appears in Moreno Fraginals et. al., “Level and structure,” 1213 and n.

34 Sutch, Richard, “The Breeding of Slaves for Sale and the Westward Expansion of Slavery, 1850–1860,” in Race and Slavery, 178 ff.Google Scholar; Craton, Michael, “Jamaican Slavery,” in Race and Slavery, 269 Google Scholar; Engerman, Stanley L., “Comments on the Study of Race and Slavery,” in Race and Slavery, 503 Google Scholar; Corwin, Arthur, Spain and the Abolition of Slavery in Cuba 1817–1886 (Austin, 1967); 33, 133, 136Google Scholar; Lockhart, James, Spanish Peru (Madison, 1968), 178–79Google Scholar; Bowser, Frederick L., The African Slave in Colonial Peru, 1524–1650 (Stanford, 1974), 255, 257–258.Google Scholar

35 Bowser, , “The Free Person,” 348.Google Scholar

36 See, for example, Johnson, Lyman L., “Manumission in Colonial Buenos Aires, 1776–1810,” HAHR 59 (May 1979), 258–279 Google Scholar; Bowser, , “The Free Person”, 339–351 Google Scholar; Schwartz, Stuart B., “The Manumission of Slaves in Colonial Brazil; Bahia, 1684–1745,” HAHR 54 (Nov. 1974), 603–635 Google Scholar; de Queiros Mattoso, Katia M., “A proposito de Cartas de Alforria, Bahia, 1779–1850,” Anais de Historia 4 (1972), 23–45.Google Scholar

37 In regression, the question being asked is how well the variable x (age) accounts for y (price), assuming a linear relationship.

38 Schwartz, , “The Manumission,” 611 Google Scholar; Mattoso, , “A proposito,” 41 Google Scholar; Bowser, , “The Free Person,” 350 Google Scholar; Johnson, , “Manumission,” 262–263 Google Scholar; Russell-Wood, A.J.R., The Black Man in Slavery and Freedom in Colonial Brazil (New York, 1982), 48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Higman, B.W., Slave Population and Economy in Jamaica 1807–1834 (London, New York and Melbourne, 1976), 176.Google Scholar

39 AN, 391 (1721); AN, 196 (1722).

40 AN, 391 (1722).

41 Scott, Rebecca J., “Gradual Abolition and the Dynamics of Slave Emancipation in Cuba, 1868–1886,” HAHR 63 (Aug. 1983), 449 ff.Google Scholar

42 AN, 392 (1692).

43 AN, 325 (1666)

44 AN, 257 (1727).

45 AN, 391 (1723); AN, 391 (1721).

46 AN, 589 (1752).

47 AN, 700 (1725).

48 AN, 454 (1725).

49 AN, 454 (1725).

50 AN, 350 (1751).

51 AN, 196 (1723).

52 AN, 569 (1723).

53 The most recent literature on runaway slaves in Mexico can be found in Palmer, , Slaves, 52 ff.Google Scholar; Taylor, William B., “The Foundation of Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe de los Morenos de Amapa,” The Americas 26 (Apr. 1970), 439–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carroll, Patrick J., “Mandiga; The Evolution of a Mexican Runaway Slave Community, 1737–1827,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 19 (Oct. 1977), 488–505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Davidson, David M., “Negro Slave Control and Resistance in Colonial Mexico, 1519–1650,” HAHR 46 (Aug. 1966), 243 ff.Google Scholar

54 AGN, Inquisicion, 832.52 (1731); AGN, Inquisicion, 832.53 (1731); AGN, Inquisicion, 832.54 (1731).

55 AGN, Inquisicion, 1035.35 (1763); AGN, Inquisicion, 1035.4.

56 Archivo Judicial del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Federal, Mexico City, 92.18 (1738).

57 AGN, Inquisicion, 856.5 (1735).

58 AGN, Inquisicion, 849 ff. 504 a 545 (1734).

59 Zorrilla, Luis G., Historia de lds relaciones entre Mexico y los Estados Unidos de America 1800–1958 (2 vols.; Mexico, 1977), 1, 87.Google Scholar

60 Palmer, , Slaves, 140.Google Scholar

61 Barrett, , The Sugar Hacienda, 85,Google Scholar suggests that there were more runaways in the Morelos region in the mid-eighteenth century than at any other time, and that masters exerted, “less trouble to capture them than formerly.”