Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:42:03.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Central America and the United States: Overlooked Foreign Policy Objectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

Thomas M. Leonard*
Affiliation:
University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida

Extract

Since the fall of Nicaragua's Somoza dynasty in 1979, nearly 900 books dealing with Central America have appeared. They repeat the themes of imperialism, paternalism, and security that traditionally have characterized studies about Central America and its relations with the U.S. The imperialist theme is pursued by Walter LaFeber's Inevitable Revolutions and Karl Berman's Under the Big Stick. They assert that the United States economically exploited and politically controlled Central America in general and Nicaragua in particular. A sense of moral righteousness is found in Tom Buckley's Violent Neighbors and Richard Alan White's The Morass while the security theme is pursued by John Findling in his Close Neighbors, Distant Friends. Histories about Central America reinforce these themes. For example, the Dean of the U.S. Central Americanists Ralph Lee Woodward, Jr., and Costa Ricans Edelberto Torres-Rivas and Hector Pérez-Brignoli, and Honduran Mario Argueta demonstrate that the American businessmen capitalized upon the ignorance of region's elite for their own economic gain. Despite their diversity, all of these volumes demonstrate that the United States dominated the relationship and criticize it for so doing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 LaFebcr, Walter, Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America (New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1986)Google Scholar; Berman, Karl, Under the Big Stick: Nicaragua and the United States Since 1848 (Boston: South End Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Buckley, Tom, Violent Neighbors: El Salvador, Central America and the United States (New York: Times Books, 1984)Google Scholar; White, Richard Allen, The Morass: The United States Intervention in Central America (New York: Harper, 1984)Google Scholar; Findling, John, Close Neighbors, Distant Friends: United States—Central American Relations (New York: Greenwood Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Woodward, Ralph Lee Jr., Central America: A Nation Divided (2nd ed.; New York: Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Torres-Rivas, Edelberto, Repression and Resistance: The Struggle for Democracy in Central America (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Pérez Brignoli, Hector, A Brief History of Central America, trans, by Sawrey, Ricardo B. and de Sawrey, Susanna Stettri (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Argueta, Mario, Tiburico Carías: autonomía de una época (Tegulcigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras, 1989).Google Scholar

2 The works by Grieb, Salisbury, and Schoonover will be referenced throughout the text. For a discussion of the availability of archival materials in Central America, see Grieb, Kenneth J., ed., Research Guide to Central America (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985).Google Scholar

3 For a discussion of the Liberal—Conservative struggle, see Woodward, Ralph Lee Jr., “The Rise and Decline of Liberalism in Central America: Historical Perspectives on the Contemporary Crisis,” Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs, 26 (Aug. 1984), 291312.Google Scholar For a discussion of the Confederative Period (1823–1839), see Ezcurira, Andrés Townsend, Las provincias unidas de Centroamérica: Fundación de las República (San José: Editorial Costa Rica, 1973).Google Scholar For a discussion of the ideological issues, see Beteta, Virgilio Rodríguez, Ideologías de la independencia (4th ed.; Guatemala: Secretaría de Información, 1965)Google Scholar; Rodriguez, Marío , The Cadiz Experiment (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978)Google Scholar; and Rodriguez, Marío, The Livingston Codes in the Guatemalan Crisis of 1837–1838 (New Orleans: Middle American Institute, Tulane University, 1955).Google Scholar For a discussion of the Liberal period at the end of the nineteenth century, see Woodward, Ralph Lee Jr., Positivism in Latin America, 1850–1900 (Lexington: D.C. Heath, 1971).Google Scholar

4 Díz, Victor Miguel, Barrios ante la posteridad (Guatemala: Tijos, 1935), pp. 471–74.Google Scholar

5 North American visitors to Central America during the nineteenth century consistently reported on the region’s backwardness. For example, see: United States National Archives, Despatches From Ministers to Central America, 1824–1906; Charles, Cecil, Honduras: The Land of Great Depths (Chicago: Rand McNally and Company, 1910)Google Scholar; and Curtis, William E., “Central America: Its Resources and Commerce,” Forum, 25 (April 1898), 166–67.Google Scholar

6 Kenyon, Gordon, “Mexican Influence in Central America, 1821–1823,” Hispanic American Historical Review, 41 (Aug. 1961), 175205 [hereafter cited as HAHR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Aragon, R.F., “The Panama Congress of 1826” (Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1926)Google Scholar; and Johnson, Guion Griffis, “The Monroe Doctrine and the Panama Conference,” James Spruent Historical Studies, The University of North Carolina (1927), 5373.Google Scholar

7 Floyd, Troy S., The Anglo—Spanish Struggle for the Mosquitia (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1967)Google Scholar; and Humphries, R.A., The Diplomatic History of British Honduras, 1638–1901 (London: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

8 Griffith, William J., “Juan Galindo, Central American Chauvinist,” HAHR, 40 (Feb. 1980), 2552.Google Scholar

9 Rodriguez, Marío, A Palmerstonian Diplomat in Central America, Frederick A. Chatfield, Esq. (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1964).Google Scholar

10 For a discussion of U.S. policy toward Central America through the 1840s, see: Lockey, Joseph B., “Diplomatic Futility,” HAHR, 30 (Aug. 1930), 265–94Google Scholar; Stansifer, Charles L., “United States—Central American Relations, 1824–1850,” in Shurbutt, Ray T., ed., United States—Latin American Relations: The Formative Years (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1991)Google Scholar; Manning, William R., Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States, vol. 2 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1925),Google Scholar and vol. 3 (Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1933). For a discussion of the Clayton—Bulwer Treaty and the 1860s, see Williams, Mary W., Anglo—American Diplomacy, 1815–1915 (Washington, D.C.: American Historical Association, 1916), chap. 3Google Scholar; and Jones, Wilbur D., The American Problem in British Diplomacy, 1841&1861 (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1974), chap. 5.Google Scholar

11 Dozier, Craig L., Nicaragua's Mosquito Shore: The Years of British and American Presence (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1985), pp. 270–99Google Scholar; and Findling, John, “La diplomacia norteamericana y la reincorporación Mosquina,” Boletín Nicaraguense de Bibliografía y Documentación, 26 (Nov.-Dec. 1987), 1524.Google Scholar

12 For a discussion of the Walker period, see: Brown, Charles, Agents of Manifest Destiny: The Lives and Times of Filibusters (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Carr, Albert, The World of William Walker (New York: Harper and Row, 1963)Google Scholar; Scroggs, William O., Filibusters and Financiers (New York: MacMillan Publishing, 1916), pp. 93107 Google Scholar; May, Robert, Southern Dream of Empire (Baton Rouge: Louisiana University Press, 1963)Google Scholar; José Ramirez, M., José de Marcoleta, padre de la diplomocia nicaraguense (Managua: Imp. nacional, 1975)Google Scholar; Loria, Rafael Obregón, Costa Rica y la guerre del 56 (la campaña del Transito 1856–1857) (San José: Editorial Costa Rica, 1976)Google Scholar; and Bauer, Carlos García, Antonio de Irisarri, diplomáticao de America, su acteración en los Estados Unidos: la colonizal colonización negro y la invasion filibustera (Guatemala: Universidad San Carlos, 1970).Google Scholar

13 For a discussion of the Lincoln colonization plan, see: Bauer, Irisarri; Beck, Warren A., “Lincoln and Negro Colonization in Central America,” Abraham Lincoln Quarterly, 6 (1950–51), 162–83Google Scholar; and Schoonover, Thomas, “Misconstrued Mission: Expansionism and Black Colonization in Mexico and Central America During the Civil War,” Pacific Historical Review, 49 (Nov. 1980), 607–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a discussion of the black experience in Central America, see Leonard, Thomas M., “Black Experience in Central America,” in Alagoa, E.J., ed., Oral Tradition and Oral History (Lagos: University of Lagos, 1990).Google Scholar

14 Malloy, William M., comp., Treaties, Conventions, International Acts, Protocols and Agreements Between the United States of America and Other Powers, 1776–1904 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1910), 1, pp. 160–69.Google Scholar Stewart, Watt, Keith of Costa Rica: A Biographic Study of Minor Cooper Keith (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1974)Google Scholar; McCann, Thomas, An American Company: The Tragedy of United Fruit (New York: Crown, 1976)Google Scholar; Findling, John, “The United States and Zeilaya: A Study in the Diplomacy of Expediency“ (Ph.D. diss., University of Texas-Austin, 1971)Google Scholar; Finney, Kenneth V., “Precious Metal Mining and Modernization of Honduras: In Quest of el Dorado, 1880–1890” (Ph.D. diss., Tulane University, 1973)Google Scholar; Fred Rippy, J., “The United States and Guatemala During the Era of Justo Rufino Barrios,” HAHR, 22 (Nov. 1942), 595610 Google Scholar; Finney, Kenneth V., “Our Man in Honduras: Washington S. Valentine,” West Georgia College Studies in the Social Sciences, 17 (June 1978), 1320.Google Scholar; Fred Rippy, J., “British Investments in Latin America, 1922–1949” (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1959), pp. 105–09Google Scholar; Schoonover, Thomas, “Imperialism in Middle America: United States Competition with Britain, Germany and France in Middle America, 1820s–1920s,” in Jeffreys-Jones, Rhodri, ed., Eagle Against Empire: American Opposition to European Imperialism (Aixen-Provence, France: Université de Provence, 1983), pp. 4158 Google Scholar; and Schoonover, Thomas, The United States in Central America 1860–1911: Episodes of Social Imperialism and Imperial Rivalry in the World System (Durham: Duke University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

15 Connick, , “United States and Central America,” pp. 157–59Google Scholar; Schoonover, “Imperialism”; John E. Findling, “The United States and Zelava”; Bald, Ralph D. Jr., “The Development of Expansionist Sentiment in the United States, 1876–1914, As Reflected in Periodical Literature” (Ph.D. diss., University of Pittsburgh, 1973)Google Scholar; Chandler, David M., “José Aycinena: Nineteenth Century Guatemalan Conservative: An Historical Survey of His Political, Religious, Educational and Commercial Careers” (M.A. thesis, Tulane University, 1965), pp. 2834 Google Scholar; Folkman, David, The Nicaraguan Route (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1972)Google Scholar; and McCullough, David, The Path Between the Seas: The Creation of the Panama Canal, 1876–1914 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1977).Google Scholar

16 Baker, George W., “The Caribbean Policy of Woodrow Wilson” (Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado, 1961)Google Scholar; Beale, Howard K., Theodore Roosevelt and the Rise of America to a World Power (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1956)Google Scholar; Cooper, John M., The Warrior and the Priest: Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Marks, Frederick W., Velvet on Iron: The Diplomacy of Theodore Roosevelt (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979)Google Scholar; and Walter, V. and Scholes, Marie V., The Foreign Policy of the Taft Administration (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1970).Google Scholar

17 United States Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United Stales 1907 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1923), 11, pp. 601–728 [Hereafter cited as FRUS.]; and Buchanan, William J., The Central American Peace Conference, 1907 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1907).Google Scholar

18 For a discussion of United States involvement in Nicaragua to 1920, see: Berman, Karl, Under the Big Stick, pp. 123–81Google Scholar; Langley, Lester D., The Banana Wars: An Inner History of American Empire, 1900–1934 (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1983), pp. 5376 Google Scholar; and Perkins, Whitney T., Constraint of Empire: The United States and Caribbean Interventions (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1981), pp. 2139.Google Scholar For a discussion of the Bryan—Chamorro Treaty, see: Bailey, Thomas A., “Interest in a Nicaraguan Canal, 1903–1931,” HAHR, 16 (Feb. 1936), 14 Google Scholar; Berman, , Under the Big Stick, pp. 167–71Google Scholar; Brownback, Peter E., “The Acquisition of the Nicaragua Canal Route: The Bryan—Chamorro Treaty” (Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania, 1952)Google Scholar; and Charles T. Weitzel, “American Policy in Nicaragua,” United States Senate, Document 334, 64th Congress, 1st session.

19 Baker, George W., “Ideals and Realities in the Wilson Administration’s Relations with Honduras,” the Americas, 21 (July 1964), 36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kneer, Warren, Great Britain and the Caribbean, 1901–1913 (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1975), pp. 134–63Google Scholar; and Paredes, Juan E., The Morgan—Honduranian, 1908–1911 (New Orleans, 1912).Google Scholar

20 For Guatemala, see: Dinwoodie, David H., “Expedient Diplomacy: The United States and Guatemala, 1898–1920” (Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado, 1966), pp. 8892, 104–20Google Scholar; Baker, George W., “The Woodrow Wilson Administration and Guatemalan Relations,” The Historian, 27 (Feb. 1963), 159–61Google Scholar; and Calvert, Peter, “The Last Occasion on Which Britain Used Coercion to Settle a Dispute with a Non-Colonial Territory in the Caribbean: Guatemala and the Powers, 1903–1913,” Inter-American Economic Affairs, 25 (Winter 1971), 5775.Google Scholar

21 Murillo-Jimenez, Hugo, “Wilson and Tinoco: The United States and the Policy of Non-Recognition in Costa Rica, 1917–1919” (Ph.D. diss., University of California-San Diego, 1978)Google Scholar (Subsequently published in Costa Rica as Tinoco y los Estados Unidos: génesis y caída de un regiem (San José: Universidad Estatal a Distancia, 1981).] Wilson’s special emissary to Costa Rica, John Foster Dulles, and U.S. authorities in the Panama Canal Zone shared Tinoco’s opinion regarding the potential German threat to the waterway.

22 Demanda de república de Costa Rica contra de la Nicaragua, ante la corte de justica centroamericana, con motivo de una convención firmada por la segunda con la república de los Estados Unidos de Amárica, par la venta del río San Juan, y otros objetos (San José: Impr. nacional, 1916); Gonzalez, Rodríguez, El Golfo de Fonseca y el tratado Bryan—Chamorro celebrado entre los Estados Unidos de Norte América y Nicaragua: doctrina Meléndez (San Salvador: Impr. nacional, 1917)Google Scholar; Hudson, Manley O., “The Central American Court of Justice,” American Journal of International Law, 26 (October 1932), 759–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Adler, Selig, “Bryan and Wilsonian Caribbean Penetration,” HAHR, 20 (May 1940), 199204.Google Scholar

23 FRUS, 1917, suppl. I, pp. 237–38, 259, 290–91; FRUS, 1918, suppl. II, pp. 89, 379; Barrett, John, “La América Central Continental y Insular,” in Simonds, Frank H., ed., Historia de la Guerra del Mundo (Garden City: Doubleday, 1920), 4, p. 370 Google Scholar; Martin, Percy A., Latin America and the War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1925), pp. 491501 Google Scholar; Kelchner, Warren H., Latin American Relations With the League of Nations (Boston: World Peace Foundation, 1930), pp. 137–38.Google Scholar Although the Tinoco government did all it could to support the Allied cause during World War 1, including a declaration of war against Germany, only Spain, of all the European powers, recognized the Tinoco government, making it a non-belligerent country, and therefore not entitled to representation at the Paris Peace Conference which began on January 12, 1919, exactly seven months to the day before Tinoco’s resignation.

24 Grieb, Kenneth J., “The United States and the Central American Federation,” the Americas, 24 (Oct. 1967), 107–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Leonard, Thomas M., “U.S. Policy and Arms Limitation in Central America: The Washington Conference of 1923,” Occasional Paper Series, Center for the Study of Armament and Disarmament, California State University-Los Angeles, 1982, pp. 120.Google Scholar

25 Hackett, Charles, “The Background of the Revolution in Honduras,” Review of Reviews, 69 (April 1924), 390–96Google Scholar; Grieb, Kenneth J., “American Involvement in the Rise of Jorge Ubico,” Caribbean Studies, 10 (April 1970), 521 Google Scholar; Grieb, Kenneth, “The United States and the Rise of General Maximiliano Hernández Martínez,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 3 (Nov. 1971), 151–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Anderson, Thomas P., Matanza: El Salvador’s Communist Revolt of 1932 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 1971), pp. 4077.Google Scholar

26 American Policy and Problems in Central America,” Morgan, Stokeley W., lecture to the Foreign Service School, Department of State, January 29, 1926, 14.Google Scholar

27 Kamman, William, A Search of Stability: United States Diplomacy Toward Nicaragua (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1968)Google Scholar; Munro, Dana G., The United States and the Caribbean Republics, 1921–1933 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974), pp. 132290 Google Scholar; Stimson, Henry L., American Policy in Nicaragua (New York: Scribner’s, 1927)Google Scholar; Macaulay, Neil, The Sandino Affair (2nd ed.; Durham: Duke University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Langley, , Banana Wars, pp. 181–93Google Scholar; Perkins, , Constraint of Empire, pp. 110–16Google Scholar; Salisbury, Richard V., “United States Intervention in Nicaragua: The Costa Rican Role,” Prologue, 9 (Winter 1977), 209–17Google Scholar; Salisbury, Richard V., Anti-Imperialism and International Competition in Central America, 1920-1929 (Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, 1989)Google Scholar; Salisbury, Richard V., “Mexico, the United States and the 1926–1927 Nicaraguan Crisis,” HAHR, 66 (May 1986), 319–39Google Scholar; Horn, James J., “U.S. Diplomacy and the Specter of Bolshevism in Mexico, 1924–1927,” the Americas, 32 (July 1975), 2742 Google Scholar; Dodd, Thomas J. Jr., “United States in Nicaraguan Politics: Supervised Elections, 1927–1932,” Revista del Pensamiento Centroamericano, 30 (July-Sept. 1975), 5102 Google Scholar; and Report of the Delegates of the United States of America to the Sixth International Conference of American States held at Havana, Cuba. January 16 to February 20, 1928 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1928).

28 Documentación relativa a la tratados centroamericano el 12 de abril de 1934 (San José: Impr. nacional, 1934); Esmeralda Astilla, Carmelo Francisco, “The Martinez Era: Salvadoran—American Relations, 1931–1944” (Ph.D. diss., Louisiana State University, 1976), pp. 7273 Google Scholar; Thomas M. Leonard, “The Washington Conference of 1923”; “Los pactos Washington son la llave,” La Prensa, November 8, 1932, p. 2.

29 United States Library of Congress, Papers of Charles Evans Hughes, Period of International Activity, “Latin American Conferences, 1922–1929,” pp. 1–4; Leonard, Thomas M., “The Washington Conference of 1923,” pp. 24, 45Google Scholar; Grieb, Kenneth J., The Latin American Policy of Warren G. Harding (Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, 1976)Google Scholar; Hughes, Charles Evans, Our Relations With the Nations of the Western Hemisphere (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1928)Google Scholar; DeConde, Alexander, Herbert Hoover’s Latin American Policy (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1951)Google Scholar; Ellis, Ethan, Republican Foreign Policy, 1921–1933 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1968)Google Scholar; Tulchin, Joseph S., The Aftermath of War: World War I and U.S. Policy Toward Latin America (New York: New York University Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Clark, J. Reuben, Memorandum on the Monroe Doctrine (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1930)Google Scholar; Gellman, Irwin F., Good Neighbor Diplomacy: United States Policies Toward Latin America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Wood, Bryce, The Making of the Good Neighbor Policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1961)Google Scholar; and Leonard, Thomas M., “The Recognition Policy in United States—Central American Relations, 1933–1949,” Occasional Paper Series, Latin American and Caribbean Center, Florida International University, 1985, p. 30.Google Scholar

30 Gardner, Lloyd, Economic Aspects of New Deal Diplomacy (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1964), pp. 2639 Google Scholar; Steward, Dick, Trade and Hemisphere: The Good Neighbor Policy and Reciprocal Trade (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1975), pp. 125 Google Scholar; Bevans, Charles I., comp., Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States, 1776–1949 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1971), 6, pp. 1048–57Google Scholar; VII, pp. 536–44; VIII, pp. 517–24, 919–26; and X, pp. 395–405; Trueblood, Howard J., “Trade Rivalries in Latin America,” Foreign Policy Reports, 13 (Sept. 1937).Google Scholar

31 Duggan, Laurence, The Americas: The Search for Hemispheric Security (New York: Holt, 1947)Google Scholar; Freye, Alton, Nazi Germany and the American Hemisphere 1933–1941 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967)Google Scholar; Haglund, David, Latin America and the Transformation of U.S. Strategic Thought. 1936–1941 (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Conn, Stetson and Fairchild, Byron, United States Army in World War II: The Western Hemisphere (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1960)Google Scholar; Conn, Stetson, Engeman, Rose C., and Fairchild, Byron, Guarding the United States and Its Outposts: The United States Army in World War II (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1964)Google Scholar; Kimball, Warren F., The Most Unsordid Act: Lend-Lease, 1939–1941 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Humphries, R.A., Latin America During the Second World War, 2 vols. (London: London Institute for Latin American Studies, 1981)Google Scholar; Millet, Richard, Guardians of the Dynasty (Maryknoll: Orbis, 1971), pp. 191200 Google Scholar; Gamboa, Carlos Calvo, Costa Rica en las segunda mundial, 1939–1945 (San José: Universidad de Costa Rica, 1985)Google Scholar; U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, “Message of the President, 16th Report to Congress on Lend-Lease Operations for the Period ending July 30, 1944”; 77th Congress, 2nd session, Serial 10884, House Document 374; Grieb, Kenneth J., Guatemalan Caudillo, pp. 248–63Google Scholar; and Astilla, Carmelo F., “The Martinez Era,” pp. 146–91Google Scholar. Regina Wagner is completing a doctoral dissertation at Tulane University under the direction of Ralph Lee Woodward, Jr., on the issue of wartime confiscated properties in Guatemala.

32 Mecham, J. Lloyd, The United States and Inter-American Security, 1889–1960 (Austin: University of Texas, 1963), pp. 246351 Google Scholar; Molineu, Harold, U.S. Policy Toward Latin America: From Regionalism to Globalism (Boulder: Westview Press, 1986), pp. 1529 Google Scholar; Langley, Lester D., America and the Americas: The United States in the Western Hemisphere (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1989), pp. 161–88Google Scholar; Bell, John P., Crisis in Costa Rica (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1971)Google Scholar; and Leonard, Thomas M., The United States and Central America, 1944–1949: Perceptions of Political Dynamics (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1984), chap. 1.Google Scholar

33 Handy, Jim, Gift of the Devil: A History of Guatemala (Toronto: Between the Lines Press, 1984), pp. 103–48Google Scholar; Leonard, Thomas M., “Nationalism or Communism: The Truman Administration and Guatemala, 1945–1952,” Journal of Third World Studies, 7 (Spring 1990), 3451 Google Scholar; Immerman, Richard H., The CIA in Guatemala: The Foreign Policy of Intervention (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982)Google Scholar; Schlesinger, Stephen and Kinzer, Steven, Bitter Fruit: The Untold Story of the American Coup in Guatemala (New York: Doubleday, 1982)Google Scholar; Gleijeses, Piero, Shattered Hope: The Guatemalan Revolution and the United States, 1944–1954 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991)Google Scholar; Dulles, John Foster, “Communist Influence in Guatemala,” Department of State Bulletin, 30 (June 1954), 873–74Google Scholar; Dulles, John Foster, “International Communism in Guatemala,” Department of Stale Bulletin, 31 (July 12, 1954), 4345 Google Scholar; and Purifoy, John E., “The Communist Conspiracy in Guatemala,” Department of State Bulletin, 31 (November 8, 1954)Google Scholar. In reality, Washington pushed for liberalization of the Somoza regime, a fact that Somoza, if not the public, understood. “What advantage do we get from being friendly,” he asked. “You treat us like an old wife. We would rather be treated like a young mistress,” in Martz, John D., Central America: The Crisis and the Challenge (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1959).Google Scholar

34 Leonard, Thomas M., “The United States and Central America, 1955–1960,” Valley Forge Journal, 3 (June 1986), 5672.Google Scholar For a discussion of Eisenhower’s Latin American policy, see Rabe, Stephen G., Eisenhower and Latin America: The Foreign Policy of Anti-Communism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988).Google Scholar

35 Rabe, Stephen G., “Controlling Revolutions: Latin America, The Alliance for Progress and Cold War Anti-Communism,” in Patterson, Thomas G., ed., Kennedy’s Quest For Victory: American Foreign Policy, 1961–1963 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Berle, Adolf A., “Alliance for Progress vs. Communism,” Department of State Bulletin, 8 (June 24, 1961), 763–64Google Scholar; Alba, Victor, Alliance Without Allies: The Mythology of Progress in Latin America, trans, by Pearson, John (New York: Praeger, 1965)Google Scholar; Schlesinger, Arthur Jr., “The Alliance for Progress: A Retrospective,” in Hellman, Ronald G. and Jon Rosenbaum, H., eds., Latin America: The Search for a New International Role (New York: Wiley, 1975)Google Scholar; and Agency for International Development (AID), Congressional Presentations, 1962–1973, Annex Latin America and the Caribbean. For a discussion of the “Soccer War,” see: Durham, William H., Scarcity and Survival in Central America: Ecological Origins of the Soccer War (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; and Anderson, Thomas P., The War of the Dispossessed: Honduras and El Salvador (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983)Google Scholar. Stephen Streeter is completing a doctoral dissertation at the University of Connecticut under the direction of Thomas G. Patterson on United States AID programs in Guatemala during the 1960s.

36 Barber, Willard F. and Neale Ronning, C., Internal Security and Military Power: Counterinsurgency and Civic Action in Latin America (Athens: Ohio University Press, 1966)Google Scholar; Etchison, Don L., The United States and Militarism in Central America (New York: Praeger, 1975)Google Scholar; Jamail, Milton Henry, “Guatemala 1944–1972: The Politics of Aborted Revolution” (Ph.D. diss., University of Arizona, 1972)Google Scholar; Guilly, Adolfo, “The Guerrilla Movement in Guatemala,” Monthly Review, 17 (May 1965), 940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Guilly, Adolfo, “The Guerilla Movement in Guatemala,” Monthly Review, 17 (June 1965), 740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yates, Lawrence A., “The United States and Rural Insurgency in Guatemala, 1960–1970,” in Woodward, Ralph Lee Jr., ed., Central America: Historical Perspectives on the Contemporary Crisis (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1988)Google Scholar; McClintock, Michael, The American Connection: State and Popular Resistance in Guatemala (London: Zed Books, 1985), pp. 76122 Google Scholar; and Mann, Thomas C., “Democratic Ideal in Our Policy Toward Latin America,” Department of State Bulletin, 50 (June 29, 1964), 95100 Google Scholar; and U.S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Military Policies and Programs in Latin America: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, 91st Congress, 1st session.

37 Cochrane, James D., “U.S.-Policy Toward Recognition of Governments and Promotion of Democracy in Latin America Since 1963,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 4 (Spring 1972), 275–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gil, Frederico, “The Kennedy-Johnson Years,” in Martz, John D., ed., United States Policy in Latin America: Century of Crisis and Challenge (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1988), pp. 327 Google Scholar; Stephansky, Ben F., “New Dialogue With Latin America: The Cost of Political Neglect,” in Hellman, and Rosenbaum, , eds., Search for a New International Role Google Scholar; Slater, Jerome, “The United States and Latin America: The New Radical Orthodoxy,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 5 (Fall 1977), 747–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gil, Frederico, “United States—Latin American Relations in the Mid 1970s,” SECOLAS Annals, 1976, 519 Google Scholar; Francis, Michael J., “United States Policy Toward Latin America During the Kissinger Years,” in Martz, , ed., Quarter Century, pp. 2860 Google Scholar; Pastor, Robert A., “The Carter Administration and Latin America: A Test of Principle,” in Martz, , ed., 6197 Google Scholar; Pastor, , Condemned to Repetition: The United States and Nicaragua (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), pp. 49229 Google Scholar; Lake, Anthony, Somoza Falling: The Nicaraguan Dilemma: A Portrait of Washinaton At Work (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989)Google Scholar; Christian, Shirley, Nicaragua: Revolution in the Family (New York: Random House, 1985), pp. 69192 Google Scholar; and Woodward, Robert, Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA, 1981–1987 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987), pp. 112–13.Google Scholar

38 Ashby, Timothy, Bear in the Backyard: Moscow’s Caribbean Strategy (Lexington: D.C. Heath, 1987)Google Scholar; Hayes, Margaret Daly, “Not What I Say, But What I Do: Latin American Policy in the Reagan Administration,” in Martz, , ed., Quarter Century, pp. 98133 Google Scholar; Arnson, Cynthia J., Crossroads: Congress, The Reagan Administration and Central America (New York: Pantheon Books, 1989)Google Scholar; Gutman, Roy, Banana Diplomacy: The Making of American Policy in Nicaragua, 1981–1987 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1988)Google Scholar; Woodward, Veil; Tower, John, et al., Report of the President’s Special Review Board (February 26, 1987; Washington, D.C)Google Scholar; U.S. Congress, 100th Congress, 1st Session, House Report No. 100-433, Senate Report No. 100-216, Iran-Contra Affair: With Supplemental, Minority and Additional Views, November 1987; Leonard, Thomas M., “The United States, Costa Rica and the Nicaraguan Revolution,” in Jones, Howard, ed., The Foreign and Domestic Dimensions of Modern Warfare: Vietnam, Central America and Nuclear Strategy (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1988), pp. 124236 Google Scholar; and Leonard, Thomas M., Central America and the United States: The Search For Stability (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1991), chap. 9.Google Scholar

39 Salisbury, Richard V., “Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy: Costa Rica’s Stand on Recognition, 1923–1934,” HAHR, 54 (Aug. 1974), 453–78.Google Scholar

40 Salisbury, Anti-Imperialism. For Regina Wagner and Stephen Streeter, see notes 31 and 35 above. Under the direction of George Herring at the University of Kentucky, Lester Langley is completing a doctoral dissertation on the foreign policy objectives of Costa Rican President José Figueres with the United States.