Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:43:12.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Feudalism in Kievan Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2018

Extract

The question before us is to what stage of social and economic development—or, to borrow a term from geology, to what socio-political formation—Kievan Russia belongs.

Chronologically, as we know, the Kievan period included the tenth, eleventh, and twelfth centuries. Those three centuries witnessed the rise and blossoming of feudal institutions in western and central Europe; they represent what may be called the feudal age par excellence. It seems only natural that one should be inclined to place Kievan Russia in the same category and characterize its sociopolitical regime as feudal. Yet until recently Russian historians have been reluctant to do so. They did not raise any definite objections to the study of feudalism in Russia: they simply ignored the problem.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Vernadsrky, G., “Feudalism in Russia,” Speculum, XIV (1939), 300323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Malaja sovetskaja enciklopedija, (Moscow, 1931), cols. 291-292.

3 Smirnov, I. I., “Problemy krepostničestva i feodalizma v sovietskoj istoričeskoj literature,” Dvadcat' pjat' let istoričeskoj nauki v SSSR (Moscow and Leningrad, 1942), p. 96.Google Scholar