Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T01:42:52.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Historianism of Gogol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Extract

It has often been stated that Gogol, the great writer, was an utter failure as a historian. But one must differentiate between a writer and teacher of history and a person endowed with the real qualities of a historian. Gogol was never a “trained” historian. He never attended any specifically devised history courses. But he read a great deal about history through secondary accounts, and he examined many original historical sources, although among these he was less attracted by chronicles and official accounts than by the oral tradition and folk-lore. To him, for instance, the songs and legends of the Ukraine were worth more than volumes of historical accounts about the land of his birth. Nevertheless, he had a true concept of history and of its implications for the life of man individually or in a community, and we cannot possibly discount him as a historian unless we can (or dare to) discount another great historian— Thomas Carlyle—who, I am happy to notice, is coming back into recognition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kotljarevskij, Nestor, Nikolaj Vasil'evič Gogol' (3rd ed., St. Petersburg, 1911), p. 193.Google Scholar

2 Šenrok, V. I., ed., Fis'ma N. V. Qogolja (St. Petersburg, 1901), I, 206.Google Scholar

3 Kotljarevskij, , Gogol', p. 116.Google Scholar

4 Šenrok, , fis'ma, I, 234.Google Scholar

5 Gippius, Vasilij, compiler, N. V. Gogol’ v pis'makh i vospominanijakh (Moscow, 1931), p. 75.Google Scholar

6 Šenrok, , Fis'ma, I, 268.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., I, 270–71.

8 In Russian, there is a play on words here: “Neobščee vo vseobščej istorii.“

9 Gippius, , Gogol', pp. 8687.Google Scholar

10 Tikhonravov, N. S., ed., Socinenija N. V. Gogolja (St. Petersburg, 1896), I, 116.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., I, 484. Google Scholar

12 Ibid., 1, 214–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Ibid., I, 484; 150–65.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., I, 150.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., I, 151.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., I, 154.Google Scholar

17 Gjrppius, , Gogol', p. 89.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., p. 118.Google Scholar

19 Senrok, V. I., Materialy dlja biografii Gogolja (Moscow, 1892–1898), II, 230.Google Scholar

20 Tikhonravov, , Socinenija, I, 127.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., I, 129.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., I, 132.Google Scholar

23 Kotljarevskij, , Gogol', p. 122.Google Scholar

24 Gippius, , Gogol', p. 102.Google Scholar

25 Ibid. 121 n.Google Scholar

26 Senrofc, , Pis'ma, I, 357.Google Scholar

27 Gippius, , Gogol', p. 112.Google Scholar

28 Kotljarevskij, , Gogol', p. 116.Google Scholar

29 Gippius, , Gogol', p. 93.Google Scholar

30 Ibid.,p. 76.Google ScholarPubMed

31 Tikhonravov, , Sošinenija, I, 223–24.Google Scholar

32 Kotljarevskij, , Gogol', p. 216.Google Scholar

33 Tikhonravov, , Sošinenija, II, 418–19.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., II, 444.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., II, 455.Google Scholar

36 Ibid., II, 477–78.Google Scholar

37 Kotljarevskij, , Gogol', pp. 221–22.Google Scholar

38 Gippius, , Gogol', p. 295.Google Scholar

39 Brasol, Boris, The Mighty Three: Poushkin-Gogol-Dostoievsky (New York, 1934), p. 134.Google Scholar