Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:08:20.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chekhov's Reception in England and America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Charles W. Meister
Charles W. Meister*
Affiliation:
Arizona State College, Flagstaff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A summary of British and American evaluations of Anton Chekhov's writings affords an insight into the nature of international literary criticism. Chekhov's slow, steady climb to recognition shows the extent to which non-literary factors influence the formation of critical judgment. It also shows how a critical approach can slowly evolve until it is very useful in explaining novel literary effects.

As might be expected, Chekhov's works were known earlier in France and Germany than in England, and earlier in England than in America. As early as 1888, the year his collection of stories In Twilight received the Pushkin Prize from the Imperial Academy of Sciences, Chekhov began to be mentioned in the annual reviews of continental literature published in the Athenaeum. The first extended notice of Chekhov in England, however, came in 1891, when E. J. Dillon cited Chekhov as an example of the Russian writer whose works suffered because he was subjected to a number of fetters. As important as the rigid governmental censorship, and perhaps stemming ultimately from it, said Dillon, was the tyrannous yoke of a capricious and coarse-minded public, the cupidity of uneducated editors and publishers, and the narrow limits of self-appointed critics.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Slavic and East European Review , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1953 , pp. 109 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Review of Reviews, IV (July, 1891), 79-83.Google ScholarPubMed

2 Ibid., p. 80.

3 The Fortnightly Review, N. S. LXII (July 1, 1902), 103-18.Google Scholar

4 Victor Yarros, the Dial, XX (January 16, 1896), 39–40.Google Scholar

5 The Forum, XXVIII (September, 1899), 119–28.Google Scholar Though one of America's best-informed writers on Russian literature at the time, Cahan called Chekhov “a nobleman by birth and education,” and like many subsequent critics said Chekhov had never attempted a full-length novel. Cahan, , the Bookman, XVI (December, 1902), 333.Google Scholar

6 Brinton, Christian, the Critic, XLV (October, 1904), 318–20.Google Scholar

7 Lowell Institute Lectures (Boston, 1901).

8 Brinton, , op. cit., p. 320.Google Scholar

9 Anthology of Russian Literature (New York, 1903), II, 459–60.Google Scholar

10 The Academy, LXXII (June 15, 1907), 585.Google Scholar

11 New Quarterly Review, I (1008), 405–29.Google Scholar

12 The Cherry Garden (New Haven, 1908).Google Scholar

13 The Times (London), May 30, 1911, p. 13d.Google ScholarPubMed

14 The New Age, N. S. IX (June 8, 1911), 132.Google Scholar

15 The Saturday Review, CXI (June 3, 1911), 677-78.Google Scholar

16 Two Flays by Tchekhof (London, 1912).Google Scholar

17 Ibid.

18 Ibid.

19 Selver, P., the New Age, N. S. XVI (February 4, 1915), 376.Google Scholar

20 The New Statesman, V (July 24, 1915), 373–74.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., VIII (November 18, 1916), 159–60.Google Scholar

22 The Atlantic Monthly, CXVI (July, 1915), 60–68.Google Scholar

23 The Nation, CI (November 11, 1915), 572.Google Scholar

24 The Best Short Stories of 1917 (Boston, 1018), p. 512.Google Scholar

25 The Bookman, XLVIII (November, 1918), 356-64.Google Scholar

26 The Dial, LXV (November 30, 1918), 498-99.Google Scholar

27 Current Literature, XL (April, 1906), 407-8.Google Scholar

28 The Nation, CII (June 1, 1916), 603.Google Scholar

29 The Theatre, XXIV (June, 1916), 10–11.Google Scholar

30 The New Republic, VII (July 8, 1916), 256-58.Google Scholar

31 The Letters of Katherine Mansfield (New York, 1936), p. 204.Google ScholarPubMed

32 The Common Reader (New York, 1925), pp. 248-49.Google Scholar

33 Chehov, Anton: A Critical Study (London, 1923), pp. 14, 18.Google Scholar

34 Times Literary Supplement (London), December 6, 1923, p. 841b.Google Scholar

35 The Freeman, III (April 6, 1921), 90–92.Google Scholar

36 Heartbreak House (New York, 1919), introduction, p. x.Google Scholar

37 The North American Review, CCXVII (March, 1923), 351.Google Scholar

38 The Monthly Criterion, VI (October, 1927), 292–304.Google Scholar

39 New York Times, June 2, 1929, Part 8, p. 1.Google ScholarPubMed

40 Chekhov, Anton: The Voice of Twilight Russia (New York, 1937).Google Scholar

41 Chekhov and His Russia (London, 1948).Google ScholarPubMed

42 Chekhov, : A Biographical and Critical Study (New York, 1951).Google Scholar

43 Chekhov the Man (London, 1946).Google Scholar

44 Lavrin, Janko, An Introduction to the Russian Novel (New York, 1947).Google Scholar

45 Simmons, Ernest J., An Outline of Modern Russian Literature (1880-1940) (Ithaca, New York, 1943).Google Scholar

46 Yarmolinsky, Avrahm, The Portable Chekhov (New York, 1947).Google Scholar