Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:50:52.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Woman Suffrage in the Progressive Era: Patterns of Opposition and Support in Referenda Voting, 1910-1918

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1985

Eileen L. McDonagh  and
H. Douglas Price
Eileen L. McDonagh
Affiliation:
Northeastern University
H. Douglas Price
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sources of opposition and support for woman suffrage are analyzed with the use of the responses of male voters to constitutional referenda held in six key states during the Progressive era. Traditional axes of opposition and support for suffrage are examined, establishing that stable sources of suffrage support originate most often from Protestant and northern European constituencies (with the exception of Germans), whereas southern Europeans and Catholics (except for Germans) generally show no consistent patterns. Opposition to suffrage is most constant from Germans—both Catholic and Protestant—and from urban constituencies. A structural model indicating the greater importance of prohibition as an intervening variable compared to partisanship or turnout at the grass-roots level of voting behavior explicates the sources of direct and indirect support for suffrage while it also demonstrates the influence of educational commitment in determining suffrage voting patterns. Except in the West, opposition to suffrage was intense and greater at the grass-roots level than among legislative elites. The ultimate success of the federal amendment is discussed in the context of state referenda, the changed political climate after American entry into World War I, and the innovative efforts of state legislatures to grant “presidential” suffrage, thereby circumventing what proved to be the difficult referenda route.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 415 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alwin, D. F., & Hauser, R. M. The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 1975, 40, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annual leaflet of national Woman's Christian Temperance Union. Chicago: The Temple, 1898.Google Scholar
Anthony, S. B., Gage, M. J., Harper, I. H., & Stanton, E. C. (Eds.). History of woman suffrage (6 vols.). New York: Fowler and Wells, 1881–1922.Google Scholar
Boole, E. A. Give prohibition its chance. Evanston, Ill.: Fleming H. Revell, 1929.Google Scholar
Bordin, R. Woman and temperance: The quest for power and liberty, 1873-1900. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Cashman, D. Prohibition: The lie of the land. New York: Free Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Catt, C. C., & Shuler, N. R. Woman suffrage and politics. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1926.Google Scholar
DuBois, E. C. Feminism and suffrage: The emergence of an independent women's movement in America, 1848-1869. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1978. (a)Google Scholar
DuBois, E. C. The radicalism of the woman suffrage movement: Notes toward the reconstruction of nineteenth-century feminism. Feminist Studies, 1975, 3:1/2, 63–71. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duniway, A. S. Path breaking. New York: Schocken Books, 1971.Google Scholar
Dykstra, R. R., & Hahn, N. Northern voters and negro suffrage: The case of Iowa, 1868. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1968, 2, 202–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, L. Intemperance—the lost war against liquor. New York: Free Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Epstein, B. L. The politics of domesticity: Women, evangelism, and temperance in nineteenth-century America. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Flexner, E. Century of struggle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Friedrich, R. J. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 1982, 26, 797–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J. A., & Zinnes, D. A. (Eds.). Missing elements in political inquiry: Logic and levels of analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1982.Google Scholar
Gusfield, J. R. Symbolic crusade: Status politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Hannan, M. T. Aggregation and disaggregation in sociology. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1971.Google Scholar
Hanuschek, E., & Jackson, J. Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. J. The winning of the midwest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Kessler, L. J. A siege of the citadels: Access of women's suffrage ideas to the Oregon press, 1884-1912. University of Washington: doctoral dissertation, 1980.Google Scholar
Kleppner, P. The cross of culture. New York: Free Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kleppner, P. Who voted? The dynamics of electoral turnout, 1870-1980. New York: Praeger, 1982.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. M. The shaping of southern politics: Suffrage restriction and the establishment of the one-party south, 1880-1910. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Kraditor, A. S. The ideas of the woman suffrage movement, 1890-1920. New York: Columbia University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Langbein, L. I., & Lichtman, A. J. Ecological inference: Quantitative applications in the social science, No. 10. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, T. A. Emancipating the West's dolls, vassals and hopeless drudges. In Daniels, R. (Ed.), Essays in Western history in honor of T. A. Larsen. Laramie: University of Wyoming Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Lichtman, A. J. Prejudice and the old order: The presidential election of 1928. Chapel Hill, N.C.: The University of North Carolina Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Long, S. B. The continuing debate over the use of ratio variables: Facts and fiction. In Schuessler, K. F. (Ed.), Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.Google Scholar
Luebke, F. C. Bonds of loyalty: German-Americans and World War I. DeKalb, Ill.: Northern Illinois Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Lunardini, C. A., & Knock, T. J. Woodrow Wilson and woman suffrage: A new look. Political Science Quarterly, 1980–1981, 95.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. Suffragists and Democrats: The politics of woman suffrage in America. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Moynihan, R. B. Abigail Scott Duniway of Oregon: Woman and suffragist of the American frontier. New Haven, Conn: unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, 1979.Google Scholar
New York Times, November 6, 1917.Google Scholar
Ostrander, G. M. The prohibition movement in California, 1848-1933. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, M. The rights of women. New York: Scribner's, 1893.Google Scholar
Paulson, R. E. Women's suffrage and prohibition: A comparative study of equality and social control. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1973.Google Scholar
Piepkorn, A. C. Profiles in belief: The religious bodies of the United States and Canada (Vol. II). San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1978.Google Scholar
Pleck, E. The ERA defeat: An historian's perspective. The Organization of American Historian's News-letter (August), 1982.Google Scholar
Rorabaugh, W. J. The alcoholic republic: An American tradition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. S. Feminists in politics. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Scott, A. F., & Scott, A. M. One half the people: The fight for woman suffrage. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. The emancipation of the American woman. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.Google Scholar
Snapp, M. A. Defeat the Democrats: The Congressional Union for Woman Suffrage in Arizona, 1914 and 1916. Journal of the West, 1975, 14, 131–139.Google Scholar
Stegh, L. J. Wet and dry battles in the cradle state of prohibition: Robert J. Buckley and the repeal of prohibition in Ohio. Kent, Ohio: unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1975.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. Communism, conformity, and civil liberties. New York: Doubleday, 1955.Google Scholar
Theil, H. Linear aggregation of economic relations. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1954.Google Scholar
Timberlake, J. H. Prohibition and the progressive movement, 1900-1920. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Meer, P. R. Religion, society and politics: A classification of American religious groups. Social Science History, 1981, V, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, H. L. Progressivism in Ohio, 1897-1917. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.