Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:21:24.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Unfamiliarity Breeds Contempt: How Partisan Selective Exposure Sustains Oppositional Media Hostility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

ERIK PETERSON Open the ORCID record for ERIK PETERSON [Opens in a new window]  and
ALI KAGALWALA Open the ORCID record for ALI KAGALWALA [Opens in a new window]
ERIK PETERSON*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
ALI KAGALWALA*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
*
Erik Peterson, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University, [email protected].
Ali Kagalwala, Graduate Student, Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Partisans hold unfavorable views of media they associate with the other party. They also avoid out-party news sources. We link these developments and argue that partisans assess out-party media based on negative and inaccurate stereotypes. This means cross-cutting exposure that challenges these misperceptions can improve assessments of out-party media. To support this argument, we use survey-linked web browsing data to show that the public has hostile views of out-party news sources they rarely encounter. We conduct three survey experiments that demonstrate cross-cutting exposure to nonpolitical or neutral political stories, forms of news widely available from online partisan sources, reduces oppositional media hostility. This explains how perceptions of rampant bias from out-party media coexist with more modest differences in the online content of major partisan news outlets. More broadly, we illustrate how negative misperceptions can sustain animus towards an out-group when people avoid encounters with them.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 115 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 585 - 598
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors thank Jamie Druckman, Johanna Dunaway, Jonathan Mummolo, Matthew Hayes, Shanto Iyengar, Mike Tomz, Michelle Torres, Paul Sniderman, and participants at Rice University’s Texas American Politics Symposium for helpful comments and Texas A&M’s College of Liberal Arts, Stanford’s Laboratory for the Study of American Values, the Bill Lane Center for the American West, the Hoover Institution, and the Knight Foundation for financial support. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CCV1NN.

References

Ahler, Douglas J., and Sood, Gaurav. 2018. “The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences.” Journal of Politics 80 (3): 964–981.10.1086/697253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, Gordon G. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2015. “How Does Media Choice Affect Hostile Media Perceptions? Evidence from Participant Preference Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (1): 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin, Dunaway, Johanna, Johnson, Martin, and Wielen, Ryan J. Vander. 2020. “Strategic Candidate Entry and Congressional Elections in the Era of Fox News.” American Journal of Political Science 64 (2): 398–415.10.1111/ajps.12478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin, Johnson, Martin, and Murphy, Chad. 2012. “Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure.” Journal of Politics 74 (1): 174–186.10.1017/S002238161100123XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Allison. 2020. “Attacking the Fourth Estate: The Nature and Effects of Political Leaders’ War with the Press.” In Leadership, Populism and Resistance, eds. Bezio, Krisitin M. S. and Goethals, Al, 129–47. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781788979269.00016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakshy, Eytan, Messing, Solomon, and Adamic, Lada A.. 2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348 (6239): 1130–1132.10.1126/science.aaa1160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnidge, Matthew, Gunther, Albert C., Kim, Jinha, Hong, Yangsun, Perryman, Mallory, Tay, Swee Kiat, and Knisely, Sandra. 2020. “Politically Motivated Selective Exposure and Perceived Media Bias.” Communication Research 47 (1): 82–103.10.1177/0093650217713066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Matthew, and Gussin, Phil. 2007. “In the Eye of the Beholder: How Information Shortcuts Shape Individual Perceptions of Bias in the Media.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (1): 1–31.10.1561/100.00007010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Matthew, and Groeling, Tim. 2008. “New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse.” Political Communication 25 (4): 345–365.10.1080/10584600802426965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey, and Sobieraj, Sarah. 2013. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolsen, Toby, and Leeper, Thomas J.. 2013. “Self-Interest and Attention to News Among Issue Publics.” Political Communication 30 (3): 329–348.10.1080/10584609.2012.737428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budak, Ceren, Goel, Sharad, and Rao, Justin M.. 2016. “Fair and Balanced? Quantifying Media Bias through a Crowdsourced Content Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (S1): 250–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy-Krutz, Jeffrey, and Moehler, Devra C.. 2015. “Moderation from Bias: A Field Experiment on Partisan Media in a New Democracy.” Journal of Politics 77 (2): 575–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, Kevin, Tewskbury, David, Bond, Bradley J., Drogos, Kristin L., Porter, Robert W., Yahn, Ashley, and Zhang, Yuanyuan. 2008. “Hostile News: Partisan Use and Perceptions of Cable News Programming.” Journal of Communication 58 (2): 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Alexander, and McClellan, Oliver A.. 2019. “Validating the Demographic, Political, Psychological, and Experimental Results Obtained from a New Source of Online Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics 6 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Nicholas T., and Dunaway, Johanna 2016. “Party Polarization, Media Choice, and Mass Partisan-Ideological Sorting.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (S1): 272–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Benedictis-Kessner, Justin, Baum, Matthew, Berinsky, Adam J., and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2019. “Persuading the Enemy: Estimating the Persuasive Effects of Partisan Media with the Preference-Incorporating Choice and Assignment Design.” American Political Science Review 113 (4): 902–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorison, Charles A., Minson, Julia A., and Rogers, Todd. 2019. “Selective Exposure Partly Relies on Faulty Affective Forecasts.” Cognition 188: 98–107.10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druckman, James N., Gubitz, S. R., Levendusky, Matthew, and Lloyd, Ashley. 2019. “How Incivility on Partisan Media (De-)Polarizes the Electorate.” Journal of Politics 81 (1): 291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, Levendusky, Matthew, and Ryan, John Barry. Forthcoming. “(Mis-)Estimating Affective Polarization” Journal of Politics. https://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/our-work/working-papers/2019/wp-19-25.html.Google Scholar
Feldman, Lauren. 2011. “Partisan Differences in Opinionated News Perceptions: A Test of the Hostile Media Effect.” Political Behavior 33 (3): 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaxman, Seth R., Goel, Sharad, and Rao, Justin M.. 2016. “Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80: 298–320.10.1093/poq/nfw006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, R. Kelly. 2009. “Echo Chambers Online? Politically Motivated Selective Exposure among Internet Users.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2): 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, and Shapiro, Jesse M.. 2011. “Ideological Segregation Online and Offline.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4): 1799–1839.10.1093/qje/qjr044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, Roger, and Chaiken, Shelly. 1994. “The Causes of Hostile Media Judgments.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30 (2): 165–180.10.1006/jesp.1994.1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goidel, Kirby, Goidel, Spencer, and Davis, Nicholas T.. 2018. “Changes in Perceptions of Media Bias.” Working Paper. http://www.nicholastdavis.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/media-bias-w-authors.pdf.Google Scholar
Goldman, Seth K., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2011. “The Friendly Phenomenon: A Cross-National Analysis of Cross-Cutting Exposure.” Political Communication 28 (1): 42–66.10.1080/10584609.2010.544280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, Albert C., and Schmitt, Kathleen. 2004. “Mapping Boundaries of the Hostile Media Effect.” Journal of Communication 54 (1): 55–70.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guess, Andrew M. Forthcoming. “(Almost) Everything in Moderation: New Evidence on Americans’ Online Media Diets.” American Journal of Political Science. https://csdp.princeton.edu/publications/almost-everything-moderation-new-evidence-americans-online-media-diets.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James T. 2004. All the News That’s Fit To Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hindman, Matthew. 2018. The Internet Trap: How the Digital Economy Builds Monopolies and Undermines Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Vincent L. 2003. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn about Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Hahn, Kyu S.. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59 (1): 19–39.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Hahn, Kyu S., Krosnick, Jon, and Walker, John. 2008. “Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yphtach, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2019. “The Origins and Consequenes of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129–146.10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Cappella, Joseph N.. 2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, Barbara K., and Johnson, Thomas J.. 2016. “Across the Great Divide: How Partisanship and Perceptions of Media Bias Influence Changes in Time Spent with Media.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 60 (4): 604–623.10.1080/08838151.2016.1234477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Jonathan. 2012. Why Americans Hate the Media and How it Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400840359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1944. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lees, Jeffrey, and Cikara, Mina. 2020. “Inaccurate Group Meta-Perceptions Drive Negative Out-Group Attributions in Competitive Contexts.” Nature Human Behaviour 4: 279–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lelkes, Yphtach, Sood, Gaurav, and Iyengar, Shanto. 2017. “The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2013a. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2013b. “Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes toward the Opposition.” Political Communication 30 (4): 565–581.10.1080/10584609.2012.737435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2018. “Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?” Journal of Politics 80 (1): 59–70.10.1086/693987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2016. “(Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (S1): 378–391.10.1093/poq/nfv045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Ro’ee. Forthcoming. “Social Media, News Consumption and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” American Economic Review. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20191777.Google Scholar
Martin, Gregory J., and McCrain, Joshua. 2019. “Local News and National Politics.” American Political Science Review 113 (2): 372–384.10.1017/S0003055418000965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Gregory J., and Yurukoglu, Ali. 2017. “Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization.” American Economic Review 107 (9): 2565–2599.10.1257/aer.20160812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messing, Solomon, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2014. “Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media.” Communication Research 41 (8): 1042–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore-Berg, Samantha L., Ankori-Karlinsky, Lee-Or, Hameiri, Boaz, and Bruneau, Emile. 2020. “Exaggerated Meta-Perceptions Predict Intergroup Hostility Between American Political Partisans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (26): 14864–14872.10.1073/pnas.2001263117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Shleifer, Andrei. 2005. “The Market for News.” American Economic Review 95 (4): 1031–1053.10.1257/0002828054825619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummolo, Jonathan. 2016. “News from the Other Side: How Topic Relevance Limits the Prevalence of Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Politics 78 (3): 763–773.10.1086/685584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munger, Kevin. 2017. “Tweetment Effects of the Tweeted: Experimentally Reducing Racist Harassment.” Political Behavior 39 (3): 629–649.10.1007/s11109-016-9373-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munger, Kevin. 2020. “All the News That’s Fit to Click: The Economic of Clickbait Media.” Political Communication 37 (3): 376–397.10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana, C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2015. In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691165110.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana, C., and Martin, Paul S.. 2001. “Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media.” American Political Science Review 95 (1): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Erik, Goel, Sharad, and Iyengar, Shanto. 2019. “Partisan Selective Exposure in Online News Consumption: Evidence from the 2016 Presidential Campaign.” Political Science Research & Methods. doi:10.1017/psrm.2019.55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Erik, and Muñoz, Manuela. 2020. “‘Stick to Sports’: Evidence from Sports Media on the Origins and Consequences of Newly Politicized Attitudes.” Working Paper. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/dr397/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Tropp, Linda R.. 2011. When Groups Meet: The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Prat, Andrea. 2018. “Media Power.” Journal of Political Economy 126 (4): 1747–1783.10.1086/698107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossiter, Erin. 2020. “The Consequences of Interparty Conversation on Outparty Affect and Stereotypes.” Working Paper. http://erossiter.com/files/conversations.pdf.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Freedman, Jonathan L. 1967. “Selective Exposure to Information.” Public Opinion Quarterly 31 (2): 194–213.10.1086/267513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settle, Jaime E. 2018. Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Glen, and Searles, Kathleen. 2014. “Who Let The (Attack) Dogs Out? New Evidence for Partisan Media Effects.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78 (1): 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Glen, and Searles, Kathleen. 2013. “Fair and Balanced News or a Difference of Opinion? Why Opinion Shows Matter for Media Effects.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (3): 671–684.10.1177/1065912912465922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobeiraj, Sarah, and Berry, Jeffrey. 2011. “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio and Cable News.” Political Communication 28 (1): 19–41.10.1080/10584609.2010.542360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Daniel F., Van Kuiken, Drew, and Wallace, Justin. 2017. “Extended Exposure to Diverse News: Evidence From a Campus Project.” Working Paper. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3049015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication 60 (3): 556–576.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2011. Niche News. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini, and Lee, Jae Kook. 2013. “Perceptions of Cable News Credibility.” Mass Communication and Society 16 (1): 67–88.10.1080/15205436.2011.646449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini, Muddiman, Ashley, and Lee, Jae Kook. 2014. “Seeing Media as Group Members: An Evaluation of Partisan Bias Perceptions.” Journal of Communication 64 (5): 874–894.10.1111/jcom.12110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydnor, Emily. 2019. Disrespectful Democracy: The Psychology of Political Incivility. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/sydn18924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syndor, Emily. 2018. “Platforms for Incivility: Examining Perceptions across Media.” Political Communication 35 (1): 97–116.Google Scholar
Turner, Joel. 2007. “The Messenger Overwhelming the Message: Ideological Cues and Perceptions of Bias in Television News.” Political Behavior 29 (4): 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallone, Robert P., Ross, Lee, and Lepper, Mark R.. 1985. “The Hostile Media Phenomenon.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (3): 577–585.10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Link

Peterson and Kagalwala Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CCV1NN
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Peterson and Kagalwala supplementary material

Peterson and Kagalwala supplementary material

Download Peterson and Kagalwala supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 484.5 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.