Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:48:16.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vigilance and Confidence: Jeremy Bentham, Publicity, and the Dialectic of Political Trust and Distrust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

JONATHAN R. BRUNO
JONATHAN R. BRUNO*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
*
Jonathan R. Bruno is Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Government at Harvard University, and a Climenko Fellow and Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School. Working at the intersection of democratic theory, constitutionalism, and political ethics, he is currently completing a project on secrecy and transparency in democratic life ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Distrust of public authorities is a mainstay of democratic politics. In recent decades, however, concern with surging civic suspicion has led political scientists to emphasize the value of trust for good government. This article advances a novel reading of Jeremy Bentham's political theory to shed light on the promise and perils of these two dispositions. Trust and distrust go together, in Bentham's account. In making this case, I reexamine Bentham's reflections on publicity, and distinguish between two perspectives implicit in his theory—the perspective of institutional design, and the perspective of popular oversight. This distinction brings clarity to Bentham's surprising recommendation: sober distrust toward public authorities generally, together with particularized trust in those (and only those) institutions or officials who prove themselves worthy of it.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 111 , Issue 2 , May 2017 , pp. 295 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Prior versions of this article were presented to the Harvard Political Theory Workshop and the Graduate Seminar of the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, which generously supported my research. I am grateful to both audiences for their feedback, and to the following individuals for helpful suggestions: Eric Beerbohm, James Brandt, Greg Conti, Michael Frazer, Daniel Jütte, Frances Kamm, Tae-Yeoun Keum, Tsin Yen Koh, Eric Nelson, Tomer Perry, Nancy Rosenblum, William Selinger, and Cheryl Welch. For support and encouragement I thank Joshua Cherniss, Laura Hartmann, Dennis Thompson, and Daria Van Tyne. Albert Bruno was a source of joy throughout the revision process. Last but not least, I gratefully acknowledge the editorial team of the American Political Science Review, especially Steven P. Forde and four anonymous reviewers, whose incisive criticism improved the article considerably.

References

REFERENCES

Albertson, Bethany, and Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allard-Tremblay, Yann. 2015. “Trust and Distrust in the Achievement of Popular Control.” The Monist 98 (4): 375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Danielle S. 2004. Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship Since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Andeweg, Rudy B. 2014. “A Growing Confidence Gap in Politics? Data Versus Discourse.” In Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People Are Suspicious of their Leaders, eds. Prooijen, Jan-Willem van and van Lange, Paul A. M.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 176–96.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette C. 1994. Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bauhr, Monika, and Grimes, Marcia. 2014. “Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 27 (2): 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baume, Sandrine. 2014. “Does Transparency Engender the Confidence of the Governed? A Contribution to Political Thought.” In Economics and Other Branches – In the Shade of the Oak Tree: Essays in Honour of Pascal Bridel, eds. Baranzini, Roberto and Allisson, François. London: Pickering and Chatto, 425–33.Google Scholar
Baume, Sandrine, and Papadopoulos, Yannis. “Transparency: From Bentham's Inventory of Virtuous Effects to Contemporary Evidence-Based Scepticism.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19. Published electronically November 10, 2015. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2015.1092656.Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, Oren. 2000. Constitutional Limits and the Public Sphere: A Critical Study of Bentham's Constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1843. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring, John. 11 vols. Edinburgh: William Tait.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1983a. Constitutional Code, Volume I, eds. Rosen, F. and Burns, J. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1983b. Deontology together with A Table of the Springs of Action and the Article on Utilitarianism, ed. Goldworth, Amnon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1989. First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code, ed. Schofield, Philip. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1990. Securities Against Misrule and Other Constitutional Writings for Tripoli and Greece, ed. Schofield, Philip. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1996. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, eds. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1998. ‘Legislator of the World’: Writings on Codification, Law and Education, eds. Schofield, Philip and Harris, Jonathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1999. Political Tactics, eds. James, Michael, Blamires, Cyprian, and Pease-Watkin, Catherine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 2001. Writings on the Poor Laws, Volume I, ed. Quinn, Michael. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 2002. Rights, Representation, and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution, eds. Schofield, Philip, Pease-Watkin, Catherine, and Blamires, Cyprian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 2010. Writings on the Poor Laws, Volume II, ed. Quinn, Michael. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 2012. On the Liberty of the Press, and Public Discussion: And Other Legal and Political Writings for Spain and Portugal, eds. Pease-Watkin, Catherine and Schofield, Philip. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 2015. The Book of Fallacies, ed. Schofield, Philip. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1998. “Institutionalizing Distrust, Enculturating Trust.” In Trust and Governance, eds. Braithwaite, Valerie and Levi, Margaret. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 343–75.Google Scholar
Cleary, Matthew R., and Stokes, Susan C.. 2006. Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: Political Trust in Argentina and Mexico. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Cook, Karen S., Hardin, Russell, and Levi, Margaret. 2005. Cooperation without Trust? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Crimmins, James E. 2011. Utilitarian Philosophy and Politics: Bentham's Later Years. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cutler, Fred. 1999. “Jeremy Bentham and the Public Opinion Tribunal.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63 (3): 321–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
De Champs, Emanuelle. 2015. Enlightenment and Utility: Bentham in French, Bentham in France. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1988. “Trust and Political Agency.” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, ed. Gambetta, Diego. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 73–93.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2007. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2013. Securities Against Misrule: Juries, Assemblies, Elections. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Stephen G. 2003. Imagining Interest in Political Thought. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Stephen G. 2011. “Introduction.” In Selected Writings: Jeremy Bentham, ed. Engelmann, Stephen G.. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1–27.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Gambetta, Diego. 1988. “Can We Trust Trust?” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, ed. Gambetta, Diego. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 213–37.Google Scholar
Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar, and McCarthy, Robert J. Jr. 1994. “Panopticism and Publicity: Bentham's Quest for Transparency.” Public Culture 6 (3): 547–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halévy, Elie. 1960. The Growth of Philosophical Radicalism. Trans. Mary Morris. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1999. “Do We Want Trust in Government?” In Democracy and Trust, ed. Warren, Mark E.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 22–41.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hart, Vivien. 1978. Distrust and Democracy: Political Distrust in Britain and America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, Katherine. 2014. “Trust, Distrust and Commitment.” Noûs 48 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 92 (4): 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 2005. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2015. Why Washington Won't Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiley, David R. 2006. Doubt and the Demands of Democratic Citizenship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, David J., and Harding, Lauren Howard. 2013. “Public Trust in Government Administrators.” Public Integrity 16 (1): 53–76.Google Scholar
Hulliung, Mark L. 1994. The Autocritique of Enlightenment: Rousseau and the Philosophes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, L. J. 1981. Bentham and Bureaucracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1999. “Trust, Well-Being and Democracy.” In Democracy and Trust, ed. Warren, Mark E.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 88–120.Google Scholar
Jones, Karen. 1996. “Trust as an Affective Attitude.” Ethics 107 (1): 4–25.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, Meena. 2015. “(White) Tyranny and the Democratic Value of Distrust.” The Monist 98 (4): 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenard, Patti Tamara. 2012. Trust, Democracy, and Multicultural Challenges. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret, and Stoker, Laura. 2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475–507.Google Scholar
Lieberman, David. 2000. “Economy and Polity in Bentham's Science of Legislation.” In Economy, Polity, and Society: British Intellectual History 1750–1950, ed. Collini, Stefan, Whatmore, Richard, and Young, Brian. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 107–34.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and Power. Trans. Howard Davis, John Raffan, and Kathryn Rooney. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2015. In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Kenneth. 2007. “Social and Political Trust.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, eds. Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Niesen, Peter. 2015. “Parole, Vérité et Liberté de Jeremy Bentham à John Stuart Mill.” Archives de Philosophie 78 (2): 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 2002. A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parry, Geraint. 1976. “Trust, Distrust and Consensus.” British Journal of Political Science 6 (2): 129–42.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1999. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 2014. “The Soul of Justice: Bentham on Publicity, Law, and the Rule of Law.” In Bentham's Theory of Law and Public Opinion, eds. Zhai, Xiaobo and Quinn, Michael, 40–62. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, and Mishler, William. 2011. “Political Trust and Distrust in Post-Authoritarian Contexts.” In Political Trust: Why Context Matters, eds. Zmerli, Sonja and Hooghe, Marc. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press, 117–40.Google Scholar
Rosen, Frederick. 1983. Jeremy Bentham and Representative Democracy: A Study of the Constitutional Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 1978. Bentham's Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. 2011. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip. 2006. Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2007. “Jeremy Bentham on Fallibility and Infallibility.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (4): 563–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1998. Political Thought and Political Thinkers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela K., and Overbeck, Jennifer R.. 2014. “The Leaders’ Rosy Halo: Why Do We Give Power Holders the Benefit of the Doubt?” In Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People Are Suspicious of their Leaders, eds. van Prooijen, Jan-Willem and van Lange, Paul A. M.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 53–72.Google Scholar
Sztompka, Piotr. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, Barton, Dona-Gene, and Wagner, Michael W. 2015. “Political Trust in Polarized Times.” In Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority: The Role of Institutional Trust, eds. Bornstein, Brian H. and Tomkins, Alan J.. New York: Springer, 167–90.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 2005. Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Healthcare. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna. 2004. “Trust, Distrust, and In Between.” In Distrust, ed. Hardin, Russell. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 60–82.Google Scholar
Van De Walle, Steven, and Six, Frédérique. 2014. “Trust and Distrust as Distinct Concepts: Why Studying Distrust in Institutions is Important.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 16 (2): 158–74.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 1999. “Democratic Theory and Trust.” In Democracy and Trust, ed. Warren, Mark E.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 310–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2006. “Democracy and Deceit: Regulating Appearances of Corruption.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 160–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E., and Gastil, John. 2015. “Can Deliberative Minipublics Address the Cognitive Challenges of Democratic Citizenship?” The Journal of Politics 77 (2): 562–74.Google Scholar
Wroe, Andrew, Allen, Nicholas, and Birch, Sarah. 2013. “The Role of Political Trust in Conditioning Perceptions of Corruption.” European Political Science Review 5 (2): 175–95.Google Scholar
Zmerli, Sonja, and Newton, Ken. 2011. “Three Forms of Trust and Their Association.” European Political Science Review 3 (2): 169–200.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.