Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:47:09.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Throwing the Rascals Out: Policy and Performance Evaluations of Presidential Candidates, 1952–1980

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1985

Arthur H. Miller  and
Martin P. Wattenberg
Arthur H. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Martin P. Wattenberg
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores two dimensions of public evaluations of presidential candidates on the basis open-ended survey questions from 1952 to 1980. The first dimension looks at whether citizens evaluate candidates on the basis of policies, performance, or strictly candidate attributes; the second examines the time perspective of these assessments, that is, whether they are retrospective or prospective. It is found that incumbents have been judged primarily on the basis of retrospective performance, challengers on prospective policy, and candidates running in nonincumbent races on prospective performance. Throughout the period from 1952 to 1980 both policy and performance considerations have become increasingly related to the vote. Except for 1964, performance has outweighed policy as a predictor of the vote, with an emphasis on retrospective evaluations whenever a incumbent runs for reelection and on prospective assessments in nonincumbent races. The 1964 case provides the best example of a policy mandate, with the 1972 election also fitting the pattern to a lesser degree. The data for the 1980 election, however, fail to support the claim of a mandate for Reagan's policy stands.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 359 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., & Rhode, R. W. Change and continuity in the 1980 elections. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Achen, C. Interpreting and using regression. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, B. Presidential elections and American politics, 1952–1980. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1980.Google Scholar
Brody, R. A., & Sniderman, P. M. From life space to polling place: The relevance of personal concerns for voting behavior. British Journal of Political Science, 1977, 7, 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. The American Voter. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
Conover, P. J. Political cues and perception of candidates. American Politics Quarterly, 1981, 9, 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, P. E. Public opinion and voting behavior. In Greenstein, F. I. & Polsby, N. W. (Eds.) Handbook of political science (vol. 4). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975.Google Scholar
Downs, A. An economic theory of democracy, New York: Harper and Row, 1957.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P. Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Kessel, J. H. The issues in issue voting. American Political Science Review, 1972, 66, 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Public opinion and American democracy. New York: Knopf, 1961.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R., & Kiewiet, D. R. Economic discontent and political behavior: The role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 1979, 23, 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. H., Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. Cognitive representations of political candidates. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1982.Google Scholar
Miller, W. E., & Shanks, J. M. Policy directions and presidential leadership: Alternative interpretations of the 1980 presidential elections. British Journal of Political Science, 1982, 12, 266–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. The changing American voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Sears, D. O. The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, D. O. Political behavior. In Lindsey, O. & Aronson, E. (Eds.). Handbook of social psychology (Rev. ed., vol. 5). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. E. Spatial models of party competition. In Campbell, A. et al. Elections and the political order. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, M. P. The decline of American political parties, 1952–1980. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.