Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:14:33.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2005

MICHAEL W. DOYLE
MICHAEL W. DOYLE
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sebastian Rosato (2003) finds the logic of the “democratic peace” flawed in his “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory,” and he cites my work and other studies as examples of the flawed logic. Some of the logic he describes is flawed, and it may characterize some of the literature in the wide field of “democratic peace,” but it is not the logic underlying the core of liberal peace theory. Indeed, the persuasive core of the logic underlying the theory of liberal democratic peace is missing from Rosato's account. Republican representation, an ideological commitment to fundamental human rights, and transnational interdependence are the three pillars of the explanation. The logic underlying the peace among liberal states rests on a simple and straightforward proposition that connects those three causal mechanisms as they operate together and only together, and not separately as Sebastian Rosato claims.

Type
FORUM
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 99 , Issue 3 , August 2005 , pp. 463 - 466
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chan Steve. 1984. “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall … Are the Freer Countries More Pacific.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 28:4 (December): 617– 48.Google Scholar
Cobden Richard. 1901. Political Writings of Richard Cobden. London: Ridgway.
Doyle Michael. 1983a. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs: Part I.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12, 3 (June): 205– 35.Google Scholar
Doyle Michael. 1983b. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs: Part II.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12, 4 (October): 323– 53.Google Scholar
Doyle Michael. 1986. “Liberalism and World Politics” American Political Science Review 80: 4 (December): 1151– 69.Google Scholar
Doyle Michael. 1996. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” In Debating the Democratic Peace, ed. Michael Brown, Sean Lynn-Jones, and Steven E. Miller. Cambridge: MIT Press, 3– 57.
Doyle Michael. 1997. Ways of War and Peace. New York: Norton.
Fearon James. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of Political Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88, 3 (September): 577– 92.Google Scholar
Gartzke Eric, Quan Li, and Charles Boehmer. 2001. “Investing in the Peace.” International Organization 55 (Spring), 391– 438.Google Scholar
Gaubatz Kurt. 1996. “Democratic States and Commitment in International Politics.” International Organization 50: 1 (Winter): 109– 39.Google Scholar
Kant Immanuel. 1970. “Perpetual Peace. In Kant's Political Writings, ed. Hans Reiss; trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lai Brian and Dan Reiter. 2000. “Democracy, Political Similarity and International Alliances.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (April).Google Scholar
Lipson Charles. 2003. Reliable Partners. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mearsheimer John. 1990. “Back to the Future.” International Security 15, 1 (Summer): 5– 56.Google Scholar
Mill John Stuart. 1859/1973. “A Few Words on Nonintervention.” In Essays on Politics and Culture, ed. Gertrude Himmelfarb. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
Mueller John. 1989. Retreat from Doomsday. Basic Books.
Rosato Sebastian. 2003. “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory.” American Political Science Review 97: 4 (November): 585– 602.Google Scholar
Rousseau Jean-Jacques. 1756/1917. “State of war” in C. E. Vaughan, ed. 1917. A Lasting Peace through the Federation of Europe. London: Constable
Rummel R. J. 1997. Power Kills. New Brusnwick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.
Russett Bruce and John O'Neal. 2001. Triangulating Peace. New York: Norton.
Schlesinger Arthur. 1965. A Thousand Days. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Schultz Kenneth. 1998. “Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises.” American Political Science Review 2: 4 (December): 829– 844.Google Scholar
Small Melvin, and J. David Singer. 1976. “The War Proneness of Democratic Regimes.” Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 1, 4 (Summer): 50– 69.Google Scholar
Van Evera Stephen. 1990. “Primed for Peace.” International Security 9, 1, 58– 107.Google Scholar
Weede Eric. 1984. “Democracy and War Involvement,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 28:4 (December): 649– 64.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.