Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:09:07.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Theoretical Analysis of the “Green Lobby”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1985

V. Kerry Smith
V. Kerry Smith*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this article is to develop a theoretical framework for analyzing why individuals support private environmental “public interest” groups. The model attempts to integrate past contributions which have argued that these decisions could be explained by one of several factors, including: bounded rationality and imperfect information (Moe, 1980); the features of the public goods provided (or influenced by) these groups (Mitchell, 1979); the existence of a disequilibrium in households' demands for public goods (Weisbrod, 1977); or as a response to contract failures (Hansmann, 1980). The article uses a theoretical framework originally developed to explain individuals' decisions to join private clubs and specifies the conditions for the efficient provision of access to different types of private, nonprofit groups. By describing the optimal access conditions as if individuals could be coordinated to assure this efficient outcome, the model provides insights into the benefits and costs associated with membership in the environmental groups in practice.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 132 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austen-Smith, D. Voluntary pressure groups. Economica, 1981, 48, 143–153.10.2307/2553479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglas, E. The market provision of the club goods once again. Journal of Public Economics, 1981, 16, 389–393.10.1016/0047-2727(81)90019-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglas, E. On the theory of clubs. American Economic Review, 1976, 66, 116–121.Google Scholar
Boadway, R. A note on the market provision of club goods. Journal of Public Economics, 1980, 13, 131–137.10.1016/0047-2727(80)90027-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. The relevance of Pareto optimality. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1962, 6, 341–354.10.1177/002200276200600405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, F. G. Pressure groups and political culture. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, J. Provision of collective goods as a function of group size. American Political Science Review, 1974, 68, 707–716.10.1017/S0003055400117496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P. A. A stock market in a general equilibrium model with technological uncertainty. American Economic Review, 1967, 57, 759–776.Google Scholar
Downing, P. B., & Brady, G. L. The role of citizen interest groups in environmental policy formation. In White, M. J. (Ed.). Nonprofit groups in a three sector economy. COUPE. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 1981.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, I., & Becher, G. G. Market insurance, self-insurance, and self-protection. Journal of Political Economy, 1972, 80, 623–648.10.1086/259916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H. B. Nonprofit enterprise in the performing arts. Bell Journal of Economics, 1981, 12, 341–361.10.2307/3003560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H. B. The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Review, 1980, 89, 835–901.10.2307/796089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. The limits of altruism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Helpmann, E., & Hillman, A. L. Two remarks on optimal club size. Economica, 1977, 44, 293–296.10.2307/2553653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. L., & Swan, P. L. Participation rules for Pareto-optimal clubs. Journal of Public Economics. 1983, 20, 55–76.10.1016/0047-2727(83)90020-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtman, A. S. A theory of nonprofit firms. Economica, 1983, 50, 439–451.10.2307/2554305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, E. How nonprofits grow: A model. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1983, 2, 350–366.10.2307/3324446CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, M. Group segregation and optimal jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy, 1974, 82, 112–132.10.1086/260173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. C. National environmental lobbies and the apparent illogic of collection action. In Russell, C. S. (Ed.). Public Choice Theory, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. C. Testing a theory of collective action with new data on a contemporary social movement. Unpublished final report to the National Science Foundation. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, March 30, 1980.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. The organization of interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Oakland, W. H. Congestion, public goods and welfare. Journal of Public Economics 1972, 1, 337–357.10.1016/0047-2727(72)90011-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965/1971.Google Scholar
Sandler, T., & Tschirhart, J. T. The economic theory of clubs: An evaluative survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 1980, 18, 1481–1521.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. Discount rates for public investment under uncertainty. International Economic Review, 1972, 13, 287–302.10.2307/2526026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, W. D., Brookshire, D. S., Walther, E. G., & Kelley, K. The benefits of preserving visibility in the national parklands of the southwest (Vol. 8). Methods Development for Environmental Control Benefits Assessment, 1981.Google Scholar
Smith, V. K. The production technology and market provision of club goods. Discussion paper no. 80-11, Dept. of Economics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1980.Google Scholar
Symonds, W. Washington in the grip of the green giant. Fortune, October 4, 1982, pp. 136–142.Google Scholar
Truman, D. B. The governmental process. New York: Knopf, 1958.Google Scholar
Ulph, A. The role of ex ante and ex post decisions in the valuation of life. Journal of Public Economics, 1982, 18, 265–276.10.1016/0047-2727(82)90006-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbrod, B. A. The voluntary nonprofit sector. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1977.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.