Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:36:12.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2011

NOAM LUPU  and
JONAS PONTUSSON
NOAM LUPU*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
JONAS PONTUSSON*
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
*
Noam Lupu is a Ph.D. candidate, Department of Politics, Princeton University, 130 Corwin Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 ([email protected]).
Jonas Pontusson is Professor of Comparative Politics, Département de science politique, Université de Genève, 40, Boulevard du Pont d'Arve, 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Against the current consensus among comparative political economists, we argue that inequality matters for redistributive politics in advanced capitalist societies, but it is the structure of inequality, not the level of inequality, that matters. Our theory posits that middle-income voters will be inclined to ally with low-income voters and support redistributive policies when the distance between the middle and the poor is small relative to the distance between the middle and the rich. We test this proposition with data from 15 to 18 advanced democracies and find that both redistribution and nonelderly social spending increase as the dispersion of earnings in the upper half of the distribution increases relative to the dispersion of earnings in the lower half of the distribution. In addition, we present survey evidence on preferences for redistribution among middle-income voters that is consistent with our theory and regression results indicating that left parties are more likely to participate in government when the structure of inequality is characterized by skew.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , May 2011 , pp. 316 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aaberge, Rolf, Björklund, Anders, Jänti, Markus, Palme, Mårten, Pedersen, Peder J., Smith, Nina, and Wennemo, Tom. 2002. “Income Inequality and Income Mobility in the Scandinavian Countries Compared to the United States.” Review of Income and Wealth 48 (4): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 155–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto F., and Giuliano, Paola. 2009. “Preferences for Redistribution.” NBER Working Paper 14825. www.nber.org/papers/w14825 (accessed April 7, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Glaeser, Edward L.. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the U.S. and Europe: A World of Difference. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Dan, and Leigh, Andrew. 2009. “More Inequality, Less Social Mobility.” Applied Economics Letters 16 (15): 1489–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus, Engler, Sarah, Potolidis, Panajotis, Gerber, Marlène, and Leimgruber, Philipp. N.d. “Comparative Political Data Sets.” www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_political_data_sets/index_ger.html (accessed March 18, 2011).Google Scholar
Autor, David, Katz, Lawrence, and Kearney, Melissa. 2006. “Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Kate, and Huber, John D.. 2010. “Economic versus Cultural Differences: Forms of Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” American Political Science Review 104 (4): 644–62.Google Scholar
Baltagi, Badi H., and Wu, Ping X.. 1999. “Unequally Spaced Panel Data Regressions with AR(1) Disturbances.” Econometric Theory 15 (6): 814–23.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 2001. “Time-series–Cross-section Data: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 271–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-series Cross-section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 634–47.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1996. “Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-series–Cross-section Models.” Political Analysis 6 (1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2004. “Time-series–Cross-section Issues: Dynamics, 2004.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Bénabou, Roland. 2000. “Unequal Societies: Income Distribution and the Social Contract.” American Economic Review 90 (1): 96–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beramendi, Pablo, and Cusack, Thomas. 2009. “Diverse Disparities: The Politics and Economics of Wage, Market and Disposable Income Inequalities.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (2): 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanden, Jo. 2009. “How Much Can We Learn from International Comparisons of Intergenerational Mobility?” Center for the Economics of Education (CEE) Discussion Paper 111. http://cee.lse.ac.uk/cee%20dps/ceedp111.pdf (accessed April 7, 2011).Google Scholar
Bradley, David, Huber, Evelyne, Moller, Stephanie, Nielsen, François, and Stephens, John D.. 2003. “Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies.” World Politics 55 (2): 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, D.E.. New York: Free Press, 206–61.Google Scholar
Corcoran, Sean P., and Evans, William N.. 2010. “Income Inequality, the Median Voter and the Support for Public Education.” Working paper. http://homepages.nyu.edu/~sc129/papers/corcoran_evans_median_voter_may_2010 (accessed March 18, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneo, Giacomo, and Grüner, Hans Peter. 2000. “Social Limits to Redistribution.” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1491–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneo, Giacomo, and Grüner, Hans-Peter. 2002. “Individual Preferences for Political Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 83 (1): 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. 2007. “Small States and Skill Specificity: Austria, Switzerland, and Interemployer Cleavages in Coordinated Capitalism.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (6): 611–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, Thomas R., and Engelhardt, Lutz. 2002. “Parties, Governments and Legislatures Data Set.” www.wzb.eu/alt/ism/people/misc/cusack/d_sets.en.htm (accessed March 18, 2011).Google Scholar
Dreher, Axel. 2006. “Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a New Index of Globalization.” Applied Economics 38 (10): 1091–1110.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, and Myles, John. 2009. “The Welfare State and Redistribution.” In Handbook on Economic Inequality, eds. Salvedra, W., Nolan, B., and Smeeding, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 639–64.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, Margarita, Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Challenges Facing Contemporary Political Economies, eds. Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D.. New York: Oxford University Press, 145–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Kam, Cindy. 2007. “Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism and Political Participation.” Journal of Politics 69 (3): 813–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael. 1991. “Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 10 (1): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goette, Lorenz, Huffman, David, and Meier, Stephan. 2006. “The Impact of Group Membership on Cooperation and Norm Enforcement: Evidence Using Random Assignment to Real Social Groups.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 212–16.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Ben, and Rehm, Philipp. 2008. “Categorical Variables in Public Opinion.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 1987. “Fiscal Influences on Trends in Wage Dispersion.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Reggio Calabria, Italy.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, Ellen. 1992. “The Rules of the Game: The Logic of Health Policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden.” In Structuring Politics, eds. Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., and Longstreth, F.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 2005. Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2006. “The Political Economy of Gender.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and McCall, Leslie. 2008. “Inequality, Public Opinion and Redistribution.” Socio-Economic Review 6 (1): 35–68.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2005. “Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (3): 449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristov, Lorenzo, Lindert, Peter H., and McClelland, Robert. 1992. “Pressure Groups and Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 48 (2): 135–63.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, Matthieu. 2008. Solidarity without the State? New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, Peter. 2004. Growing Public. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luttmer, Erzo. 2001. “Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution.” Journal of Political Economy 109 (3): 500–28.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S., and Shaowen, Wu. 1999. “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (S1): 631–52.Google Scholar
Mahler, Vincent A. 2008. “Electoral Turnout and Income Redistribution by the State: A Cross-national Analysis of the Developed Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (2): 161–83.Google Scholar
Mahler, Vincent A., and Jesuit, David K.. 2006. “Fiscal Redistribution in the Developed Countries: New Insights from the Luxembourg Income Study.” Socio-Economic Review 4 (3): 483–511.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2009. “The Political Economy of Inequality and Redistribution.” In Handbook on Economic Inequality, eds. Salverda, W., Nolan, B., and Smeeding, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 665–92.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Cook, James M. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–27.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko. 2000. “The Median-voter Hypothesis, Income Inequality, and Income Redistribution: An Empirical Test with the Required Data.” European Journal of Political Economy 16 (3): 367–410.Google Scholar
Moene, Karl Ove, and Wallerstein, Michael. 2001. “Inequality, Social Insurance and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 859–74.Google Scholar
Moene, Karl Ove, and Wallerstein, Michael. 2003. “Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending.” World Politics 55 (4): 485–516.Google Scholar
Nickell, Stephen. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica 49 (6): 1417–26.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2007. “Distribution of Gross Earnings of Full-time Employees.” www.oecd.org/document/63/0,3343,en_2649_33927_38939455_1_1_1_1,00.html (accessed March 18, 2011).Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gérard, and Tabellini, Guido. 2007. “Electoral Rules and Government Spending in Parliamentary Democracies.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 155–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2003. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2003. “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas, and Kwon, Hyeok Yong. 2006. “Power Resource Theory Revisited and Revised: Unions and Welfare Spending in OECD Countries.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas, Rueda, David, and Way, Christopher. 2002. “Comparative Political Economy of Wage Distribution: The Role of Partisanship and Labour Market Institutions.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas. 1975. “Individual Welfare, Majority Voting and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax.” Journal of Public Economics 4 (2): 163–85.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2006. “Religion and Preferences for Social Insurance.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (3): 255–86.Google Scholar
Schwabish, Jonathan, Smeeding, Timothy, and Osberg, Lars. 2006. “Income Distribution and Social Expenditures: A Cross-national Perspective.” In The Distributional Effects of Government Spending and Taxation, ed. Papadimitriou, D.B.. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 247–88.Google Scholar
Selway, Joel Sawat. 2011. “The Measurement of Cross-cutting Cleavages and Other Multidimensional Cleavage Structures.” Political Analysis 19 (1): 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shayo, Moses. 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 147–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, John C., Hogg, Michael A., Oakes, Penelope, Reicher, Stephen, and Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vernby, Kåre, and Lindgren, Karl-Oskar. 2009. “Estimating Dynamic Panel Models When There Are Gaps in the Dependent Variable.” Uppsala Universitet, Department of Government Studies in Political Economy and Welfare Working Paper Series, No. 1. www.statsvet.uu.se/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=JUHce22Y9Iw%3D&tabid=3689&language=sv-SE (accessed April 7, 2011).Google Scholar
Visser, Jelle. 2009. “ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 Countries between 1960 and 2007.” www.uva-aias.net/208 (accessed March 18, 2011)Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.