Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 2014
See note on this subject in 15 American Political Science Review, 82 (February, 1921). On state police legislation and the supreme court see article by E. M. Borchard in 33 Yale Law Journal, 847 (June, 1924).
2 Massachusetts, Connecticut, Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Michigan, Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee, Idaho, South Dakota, California and Wyoming.
3 Connecticut, Public Acts, (1921)Google Scholar, Chap. 273.
4 Laws of New York (1921), Chap. 328. For a detailed account of the New York State police dogs, see The State Trooper Magazine, (Detroit, 1921) Vol. 3, p. 15.
5 Idaho Session Laws (1921), chap. 67.Google Scholar
6 Wyoming, Session Laws (1921), chap. 18.Google Scholar
7 New Jersey Laws (1921), chap. 102, and Ibid (1922), chaps. 81 and 271. For other details as to activities, see the State Police Magazine (New York, 1921) Vol. III, p. 699 ff; and the Annual Reports.
8 H. R. 8409 and 8580, Sixty-eighth Congress, first seesion.
9 Laws of Ohio (1923), pp. 6–7.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.