Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T00:03:51.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Frances Stokes Berry  and
William D. Berry
Frances Stokes Berry
Affiliation:
Florida State University
William D. Berry
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two types of explanations of state government innovation have been proposed: internal determinants models (which posit that the factors causing a state government to innovate are political, economic, and social characteristics of a state) and regional diffusion models (which point toward the role of policy adoptions by neighboring states in prompting a state to adopt). We show that the two are conceptually compatible, relying on Mohr's theory of organizational innovation. Then we develop and test a unified explanation of state lottery adoptions reflecting both internal and regional influences. The empirical results provide a great degree of support for Mohr's theory. For the empirical analysis, we rely on event history analysis, a form of pooled cross-sectional time series analysis, which we believe may be useful in a wide variety of subfields of political science. Event history analysis may be able to explain important forms of political behavior (by individuals, organizations, or governments) even if they occur only rarely.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 84 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 395 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H., and Nelson, Forrest D.. 1984 Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Paul D. 1984. Event History Analysis Data. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes. 1987. “Tax Policy Innovation in the American States.” Ph.D. diss. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., and Lowery, David. 1987. Understanding United States Government Growth: An Empirical Analysis of the Postwar Era. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bingham, Richard D., Hawkins, Brett W., and Ted Hebert, F.. 1978. The Politics of Raising State and Local Revenues. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Baum, Lawrence. 1981. “Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovations.” American Political Science Review 75: 975–87.Google Scholar
Crain, Robert L. 1966. “Fluoridation: The Diffusion of Innovation among Cities.” Social Forces 44: 467–76.Google Scholar
Downs, George W. Jr., 1976. Bureaucracy, Innovation, and Public Policy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel. 1972. American Federalism. New York: Thomas Crowell.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, David. 1977. “Religious Forces and ‘Morality’ Policies in the American States.” Western Political Quarterly 30: 411–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, Irwin, and Menzel, Donald C.. 1978. “The Adoption of Technological Innovations by Municipal Governments.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 13: 469–90.Google Scholar
Filer, John E., Moak, Donald L., and Uze, Barry. 1988. “Why Some States Adopt Lotteries and Others Don't.” Public Finance Quarterly 16: 259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Patricia K. 1985. “Interstate Communication among State Legislators Regarding Energy Policy Innovation.” Publius 15(4):99–111.Google Scholar
Glick, Henry. 1981. “Innovation in State Judicial Administration: Effects on Court Management and Organization.” American Politics Quarterly 9: 49–69.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” American Political Science Review 67: 1174–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia. 1976. “Models of Comparative State Politics: A Comparison of Cross-sectional and Time Series Analyses.” American Journal of Political Science 20: 235–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grupp, Fred W. Jr., and Richards, Alan R.. 1975. “Variations in Elite Perceptions of American States As Referents for Public Policy Making.” American Political Science Review 69: 850–58.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. 1983. The Politics of Taxation. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 1985. “Congressional Appropriations and the Electoral Connection.” Journal of Politics 47: 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Alfred R. 1978. “Intergovernmental Sources of Innovation in State Administration.” American Politics Quarterly 6: 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, James M. 1986. “The Spatial and Temporal Diffusion of Selected Licensing Laws in the United States.” Political Geography Quarterly 5: 141–59.Google Scholar
Mann, Arthur J. 1980. “Wagner's Law: An Econometric Test for Mexico, 1925–1976.” National Tax Journal 33: 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth, and Morgan, David. 1980. “Politics and Morality: The Effect of Religion on Referenda Voting.” Social Science Quarterly 61: 144–48.Google Scholar
Menzel, Donald C., and Feller, Irwin. 1977. “Leadership and Interaction Patterns in the Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” Western Political Quarterly 30: 528–36.Google Scholar
Mikesell, John L. 1978. “Election Periods and State Tax Policy Cycles.” Public Choice 33: 99–105.Google Scholar
Mikesell, John L., and Zorn, C. Kurt. 1986. “State Lotteries As Fiscal Savior or Fiscal Fraud: A Look at the Evidence.” Public Administration Review 46: 311–20.Google Scholar
Mohr, Lawrence B. 1969. “Determinants of Innovation in Organizations.” American Political Science Review 63: 111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regens, James L. 1980. “State Policy Responses to the Energy Issue.” Social Science Quarterly 61: 44–57.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, Ira. 1970. Regionalism in American Politics. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, Roeder, Phillip W., and Sigelman, Carol. 1981. “Social Service Innovation in the American States.” Social Science Quarterly 62: 503–15.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Smith, Roland. 1980. “Consumer Legislation in the American States: An Attempt at Explanation.” Social Science Quarterly 61: 58–70.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Suits, Daniel B. 1977. “Gambling Taxes: Regressivity and Revenue Potential.” National Tax Journal 30: 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuma, Nancy B., and Hannan, Michael T.. 1984. Social Dynamics. Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
Wagner, Adolph. 1877. Finanzwissenshaft, pt. 1. Leipzig: C. F. Winter.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63: 880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.