Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:04:12.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rules of the Game in Britain: Can the Politicians Be Trusted?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1982

Donald D. Searing
Donald D. Searing*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Politicians do not endorse rules of the game as reliably as is implied by traditional constitutional commentaries or by modern democratic theory. Interviews with Members of Parliament and candidates demonstrate that their views are deeply and systematically divided between alternative constitutional interpretations constructed upon foundations of party-political bias. Thus, attitudes towards nearly all rules of the game are powerfully shaped by political values such as authority and equality, values that differentiate views within as well as between the Conservative and labour parties. Similarly, patterns of support seem much affected by a disposition to boost norms that aid one's own party, depending on whether it is in Government or Opposition, and to downgrade norms that might aid political opponents. The article considers implications of these results for the viability of Britain's unwritten Constitution and for theories about the foundations of representative government.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 239 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amery, L. S. 1953. Thoughts on the constitution. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anson, Sir William R. 1922. The law and custom of the constitution, parliament, vol. I. 5th ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. 1965. British politics in the collectivist age. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Birch, A. H. 1964. Representative and responsible government. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
Blake, Robert. 1970. The conservative party from Peel to Churchill. London: Fontana Collins.Google Scholar
Bromhead, Peter. 1974. Britain's developing constitution. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian. 1970. Agreement and the stability of democracy. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Butler, Lord. 1971. The art of the possible. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Crossman, Richard. 1976. The diaries of a cabinet minister, vol. 2. London: Hamish Hamilton and Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Poly archy; participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. 1959. An introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. 10th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
DiPalma, Giuseppe. 1970. Apathy and participation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. 1950. The new image of the common man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. 1965. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
SirJennings, Ivor. 1938. The law and the constitution. 2nd ed. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
SirJennings, Ivor. 1959. Cabinet government. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511560620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SirJennings, Ivor. 1969. Parliament. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Nevil. 1977. In search of the constitution. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Keir, Sir David Lindsay. 1969. The constitutional history of modern Britain since 1945. 9th ed. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1967. Public opinion and American democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
King, Anthony. 1974. British members of parliament: a self portrait. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-02357-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony. 1977. Britain says yes; the 1975 referendum on the common market. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert. 1964. Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review 58:361–82.10.2307/1952868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, W. J. M. 1976. Models of English politics. Studies in British politics, ed. Rose, Richard. 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, John P. 1968. The British cabinet. 2nd ed. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
Marshall, Geoffrey, and Moodie, Graeme C. 1967. Some problems of the constitution. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1968. Rules of the game. International encyclopedia of the social sciences, vol. 13, ed. Sills, David L., pp. 571–76. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
Minogue, Martin, ed. 1977. Documents on contemporary British government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, Philip. 1981. The house of commons and the constitution: the challenges of the 1970s. Parliamentary Affairs 34: 253–71.Google Scholar
Parry, Geraint. 1976. Trust, distrust and consensus. British Journal of Political Science 6: 129–42.10.1017/S0007123400000594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peele, Gillian. 1978. The developing constitution. In Trends in British politics since 1945, ed. Cook, Chris and Ramsden, John, pp. 1–27. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. Hood. 1970. Reform of the constitution. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Potter, Allen. 1966. Great Britain: opposition with a capital ‘O’. Political oppositions in western democracies, ed. Dahl, Robert A., pp. 3–33. New Haven Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Prothro, James W., and Grigg, Charles M. 1960. Fundamental principles of democracy: bases of agreement and disagreement. Journal of Politics 22: 276–94.10.2307/2127359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punnett, R. M. 1971. British government and politics. 2nd ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rokeach, Milton. 1979. Understanding human values: individual and societal. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1978. Measuring politicians' values: administration and assessment of a ranking technique in the British house of commons. American Political Science Review 72: 65–79.10.2307/1953599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1980. Politicians, publics and constitutions. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Shell, Donald, and Bromhead, Peter. 1978. The British constitution in 1977. Parliamentary Affairs 31: 125–39.10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a054250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, John, Pierson, James, and Marcus, George. 1979. An alternative conceptualization of political tolerance: illusory increases 1950s–1970s. American Political Science Review 73: 781–94.10.2307/1955404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, David. 1965. The governmental process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Willey, Fred. 1974. The honourable member. London: Sheldon Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.