Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:40:38.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Return to the State: Critiques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Eric A. Nordlinger ,
Theodore J. Lowi  and
Sergio Fabbrini
Eric A. Nordlinger
Affiliation:
Brown University
Theodore J. Lowi
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Sergio Fabbrini
Affiliation:
University of Trento
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This symposium features three critiques of Gabriel Almonds argument—by Eric A. Nordlinger of Brown University, Theodore J. Lowi of Cornell University, and Sergio Fabbrini of the University of Trento.

Type
Symposium
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 875 - 901
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, Robert R., and Friedland, Roger. 1985. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1960. A Functional Approach to Comparative Politics. In The Politics of the Developing Areas, ed. author and Coleman, James. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1987. Functionalism. In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions, ed. Bogdanor, Vernon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., Flanagan, Scott C., and Mundt, Robert J.. 1973. Crises, Choice, and Change: Historical Studies of Political Development Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Bingham Powell, G. Jr. 1978. Comparative Politics: System, Process, and Policy. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1987. Political Survival: Politicians and Public Policy in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1987. Essays on the Political Economy of Rural Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard et al., eds. 1973. State and Society. 2d ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Roger, and Duvall, Raymond. 1985. The Capitalist State in Context. In The Democratic State, ed. author and Elkin, Stephen L.. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1977a. The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State. Socialist Revolution 7(3):6–28.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1977b. Beyond Corporate Liberalism. Social Problems 24:352–61.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1981. Beyond Relative Autonomy: State Managers As Historical Subjects. New Political Science 2(3):33–49.Google Scholar
Blondel, Jean. 1987. Politics. In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions, ed. Bogdanor, Vernon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callaghy, Thomas M. 1984. The State-Society Struggle: Zaire in Comparative Perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1978. The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 72:1243–61.Google Scholar
Carnoy, Martin. 1984. The State and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G., and Widenmann, Rudolf, eds. 1986. Visions and Realities of Party Government. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert, and Lindblom, Charles E.. 1953. Politics, Economics, and Welfare. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P. J. 1987. Political Science. In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions, ed. Bogdanor, Vernon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duvall, Raymond D. 1983. The Technocratic Elite and the Entrepreneurial State in Dependent Industrialization. American Political Science Review 77:569–87.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1960. The Political System. 2d ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1968. Political Science. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Sills, David L.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1981. The Political System Beseiged by the State. Political Theory 9:303–25.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1987. Political System. In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions, ed. Bogdanor, Vernon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 1968. Social Institutions (The Concept). In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Sills, David L.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Elkin, Stephen L. 1985. Between Liberalism and Capitalism: An Introduction to the Democratic State. In The Democratic State, ed. Benjamin, Roger and author. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta, and Korpi, Walter. 1986. From Poor Relief to Institutional Welfare States. In The Scandinavian Model, ed. Erikson, Robert. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. 1968. Political Behavior. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Sills, David L.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Flora, Peter, and Heidenheimer, Arnold J., eds. 1981. The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Fried, Morton H. 1968. State (The Institution). In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Sills, David L.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1988. Ideas, Institutions, and American Trade Policy. International Organization 42:120–38.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John D., ed. 1984. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 1988. The Institutional Foundations of Hegemony: Explaining the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934. International Organization 42:91–119.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1986. Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Floyd. 1953. Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kasinitz, Philip. 1983. Neo-Marxist View of the State. Dissenf 30(3):337–46.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S., ed. 1987. Party Governments: European and American Experiences. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1978. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1981. City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, and Zolberg, Aristide R., eds. 1984. Working Class Formation: Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Key, Valdimir O. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, Valdimir O. 1984. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Rev. ed. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materiah Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics. Comparative Politics 16:223–46.Google Scholar
Lane, Jan-Erik, ed. 1985. State and Market: The Politics of the Public and the Private. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. 1960. Psychopathology and Politics. Rev. ed. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D., and Kaplan, Abraham. 1950. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1982. Another State of Mind. American Political Science Review 76:9–21.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16:677–715.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1969. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
McConnell, Grant. 1967. Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78:734–49.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Milk, Charles Wright. 1956. Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. New York: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1981. On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1987. Taking the State Seriously. In Understanding Political Development, ed. Weiner, Myron and Huntington, Samuel P.. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1975. The Theory of the Capitalist State and the Problem of Policy Formation. In Stress and Contradictions in Modem Capitalism, ed. Lindberg, Leon N. et al. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1984. Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco. 1986. The Impact of Institutions on Party Government: Tentative Hypothesis. In Visions and Realities of Party Government, ed. Castles, Francis G. and Widenmann, Rudolf. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1971. Congress and the Presidency. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rokkan, Stein. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard. 1984. Understanding Big Government: The Programme Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1979. Why No Corporatism in America? In Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, ed. Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard. Contemporary Political Sociology, vol. 1. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. 2 vols. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1978. Party, Bureaucracy, and Political Change in the United States. In Political Parties: Development and Decay, ed. Maisel, Louis and Cooper, Joseph. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, ed. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Graham K. 1982. Why Is There No Corporatism in the United States? In Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, ed. Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe C.. Modern Political Series, vol. 7. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1973. Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Maurice, ed. 1980. Classes, Class Conflict, and the State. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.