Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:44:16.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reason and Authority in Habermas: A Critique of the Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Stephen K. White
Stephen K. White*
Affiliation:
University of Hartford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some critics of Jürgen Habermas have charged that his ideas have an affinity with authoritarianism. This criticism rests on a fundamental misinterpretation of Habermas' project for a communicative ethics. Political authoritarianism is deeply incompatible with his conceptions of practical rationality and normative legitimacy. After demonstrating this incompatibility, I propose an explanation for the persistence of misunderstanding on this question. In conclusion, some suggestions are offered as to the sort of political orientation one can justifiably derive from Habermas' philosophical foundations.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 1007 - 1017
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodore (1976). “Sociology and Empirical Research.” In Connerton, Paul (ed.), Critical Sociology. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert (1978). “Eine Theorie des praktischen Diskurses.” In Oelmüller, Willi (ed.), Normenbegrundung und Normendurchsetzung. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1969). Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred R. (1972). “Reason and Emancipation: Notes on Habermas.” Man and World 5: 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1971). “Replik.” In Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1970). “Toward a Theory of Communicative Competence.” Inquiry 13: 360–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1971a; first published 1968). Knowledge and Human Interests. Translated by Shapiro, Jeremy J.. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1971b). “Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz.” In Habermas, and Luhmann, Niklas, Theorie der Gesellschaft Oder Sozialtechnologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1973a). Theory and Practice. Translated by Viertel, John. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1973b). “Wahrheitstheorien.” In Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1974). “Die Utopie des guten Herrschers (Eine Antwort an Robert Spaemann).” Kultur and Kritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Translated with an introduction by McCarthy, Thomas A.. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1976). Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1979a). “History and Evolution.” Translated by Parent, David J.. Telos 39: 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1979b; first published 1976). Communication and the Evolution of Society. Translated with an introduction by McCarthy, Thomas A.. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Heather, Gerard P., and Stolz, Matthew (1979). “Hannah Arendt and the Problem of Critical Theory.” Journal of Politics 1: 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, Max (1972). Critical Theory. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
Howard, Dick (1974). “A Politics in Search of the Political.” Theory and Society 1: 271–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehnhart, Christian (1976). “The Wanderings of Enlightenment.” In O'Neill, John (ed.), On Critical Theory. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
Lübbe, Hermann (1978). “Freiheit und Terror.” In Oelmüller, Willi (ed.), Normenbegrundung und Normendurchsetzung. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1970). Herbert Marcuse. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert (1969). An Essay on Liberation. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert, Habermas, Jürgenet al. (1978–1979). “Theory and Politics: A Discussion with Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, Heinz Lubasz, and Telman Spengler.” Telos 39: 124–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Reinhart K. (1977). Jürgen Habermas' Aufhebung der Philosophie. Sonderheft, Philosophische Rundschau, Beiheft 8. Tübingen: JCB Mohr.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas A. (1978). The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kai (1977). “Rationality, Needs and Politics.” Cultural Hermeneutics 4: 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, John (1976). “Critique and Remembrance.” In O'Neill, (ed.), On Critical Theory. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
Paterson, John (1979). “Moral Development and Political Thinking.” Western Political Quarterly 1: 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah (1972). Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaemann, Robert (1977; first published 1972). “Die Utopie der Herrschaftsfreiheit.” Zur Kritik der politischen Utopie. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.Google Scholar
Wellmer, Albrecht (1976). “Communication and Emancipation: Reflections on the ‘Linguistic Turn’ in Critical Theory.” In O'Neill, John (ed.), On Critical Theory. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
Wellmer, Albrecht (1979). Praktische Philosophie und Theorie der Gesellschaft. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
White, Stephen K. (1979). “Rationality and the Foundations of Political Philosophy: An Introduction to the Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas.” Journal of Politics 4: 1156–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.